These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
334 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27788960)
1. Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computed Tomography for Breast Target Volume Delineation in Prone and Supine Positions. Pogson EM; Delaney GP; Ahern V; Boxer MM; Chan C; David S; Dimigen M; Harvey JA; Koh ES; Lim K; Papadatos G; Yap ML; Batumalai V; Lazarus E; Dundas K; Shafiq J; Liney G; Moran C; Metcalfe P; Holloway L Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 Nov; 96(4):905-912. PubMed ID: 27788960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. MRI- versus CT-based volume delineation of lumpectomy cavity in supine position in breast-conserving therapy: an exploratory study. Giezen M; Kouwenhoven E; Scholten AN; Coerkamp EG; Heijenbrok M; Jansen WP; Mast ME; Petoukhova AL; Struikmans H Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Mar; 82(4):1332-40. PubMed ID: 21708426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. DE-MR simulation imaging for prone radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery: assessing its application in lumpectomy cavity delineation based on deformable image registration. Zhao C; Li J; Wang W; Gong G; Xu L; Zhang Y; Li F; Shao Q; Wang J; Liu X; Xu M Radiat Oncol; 2021 May; 16(1):91. PubMed ID: 34001182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of imaging modality (CT vs MRI) and patient position (supine vs prone) on tangential whole breast radiation therapy planning. Dundas K; Pogson EM; Batumalai V; Delaney GP; Boxer MM; Yap ML; Ahern V; Chan C; David S; Dimigen M; Harvey JA; Koh ES; Lim K; Papadatos G; Lazarus E; Descellar J; Metcalfe P; Holloway L Pract Radiat Oncol; 2018; 8(3):e87-e97. PubMed ID: 28993138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Tumor bed delineation for partial breast and breast boost radiotherapy planned in the prone position: what does MRI add to X-ray CT localization of titanium clips placed in the excision cavity wall? Kirby AM; Yarnold JR; Evans PM; Morgan VA; Schmidt MA; Scurr ED; desouza NM Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Jul; 74(4):1276-82. PubMed ID: 19464816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Magnetic resonance imaging- versus computed tomography-based target volume delineation of the glandular breast tissue (clinical target volume breast) in breast-conserving therapy: an exploratory study. Giezen M; Kouwenhoven E; Scholten AN; Coerkamp EG; Heijenbrok M; Jansen WP; Mast ME; Petoukhova AL; Struikmans H Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Nov; 81(3):804-11. PubMed ID: 20843611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MRI and CT imaging for preoperative target volume delineation in breast-conserving therapy. den Hartogh MD; Philippens ME; van Dam IE; Kleynen CE; Tersteeg RJ; Pijnappel RM; Kotte AN; Verkooijen HM; van den Bosch MA; van Vulpen M; van Asselen B; van den Bongard HD Radiat Oncol; 2014 Feb; 9():63. PubMed ID: 24571783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Comparison of Lumpectomy Cavity Delineations Between Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computed Tomography Acquired With Patient in Prone Position for Radiation Therapy Planning of Breast Cancer. Huang W; Currey A; Chen X; Li B; Bergom C; Kelly T; Wilson JF; Li XA Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 Mar; 94(4):832-40. PubMed ID: 26972656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of postoperative CT- and preoperative MRI-based breast tumor bed contours in prone position for radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery. Dong Y; Liu Y; Chen J; Li W; Li Y; Zhao Q; Chen Y; Huang W Eur Radiol; 2021 Jan; 31(1):345-355. PubMed ID: 32740818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Target volume delineation for partial breast radiotherapy planning: clinical characteristics associated with low interobserver concordance. Petersen RP; Truong PT; Kader HA; Berthelet E; Lee JC; Hilts ML; Kader AS; Beckham WA; Olivotto IA Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Sep; 69(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 17707265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Influence of Treatment Position (Prone vs. Supine) on Clip Displacement, Seroma, Tumor Bed and Partial Breast Target Volumes: Comparative Study. Lakosi F; Gulyban A; Simoni SB; Nguyen PV; Cucchiaro S; Seidel L; Janvary L; Nicolas S; Vavassis P; Coucke P Pathol Oncol Res; 2016 Jul; 22(3):493-500. PubMed ID: 26676979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Localization of the surgical bed using supine magnetic resonance and computed tomography scan fusion for planification of breast interstitial brachytherapy. Jolicoeur M; Racine ML; Trop I; Hathout L; Nguyen D; Derashodian T; David S Radiother Oncol; 2011 Sep; 100(3):480-4. PubMed ID: 21924509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inter-observer variations of the tumor bed delineation for patients after breast conserving surgery in preoperative magnetic resonance and computed tomography scan fusion. Jiang J; Chen J; Li W; Li Y; Chen Y; Zhang Z; Liu C; Han D; Sun H; Li B; Huang W BMC Cancer; 2021 Jul; 21(1):838. PubMed ID: 34284752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of imaging modality (magnetic resonance imaging vs. computed tomography) and patient position (supine vs. prone) on target and organ at risk doses in partial breast irradiation. Brown E; Dundas K; Surjan Y; Miller D; Lim K; Boxer M; Ahern V; Papadatos G; Batumalai V; Harvey J; Lee D; Delaney GP; Holloway L J Med Radiat Sci; 2021 Jun; 68(2):157-166. PubMed ID: 33283982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improvement in interobserver accuracy in delineation of the lumpectomy cavity using fiducial markers. Shaikh T; Chen T; Khan A; Yue NJ; Kearney T; Cohler A; Haffty BG; Goyal S Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2010 Nov; 78(4):1127-34. PubMed ID: 20304565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Variabilities of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-, Computed Tomography-, and Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography-Based Tumor and Lymph Node Delineations for Lung Cancer Radiation Therapy Planning. Karki K; Saraiya S; Hugo GD; Mukhopadhyay N; Jan N; Schuster J; Schutzer M; Fahrner L; Groves R; Olsen KM; Ford JC; Weiss E Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2017 Sep; 99(1):80-89. PubMed ID: 28816167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The impact of a radiologist-led workshop on MRI target volume delineation for radiotherapy. Kumar S; Holloway L; Roach D; Pogson E; Veera J; Batumalai V; Lim K; Delaney GP; Lazarus E; Borok N; Moses D; Jameson MG; Vinod S J Med Radiat Sci; 2018 Dec; 65(4):300-310. PubMed ID: 30076690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical applicability of cone-beam computed tomography in monitoring seroma volume change during breast irradiation. Yang TJ; Minkema D; Elkhuizen PH; Heemsbergen W; van Mourik AM; van Vliet-Vroegindeweij C Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2010 Sep; 78(1):119-26. PubMed ID: 20004533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparative study based on deformable image registration of the target volumes for external-beam partial breast irradiation defined using preoperative prone magnetic resonance imaging and postoperative prone computed tomography imaging. Yu T; Li JB; Wang W; Xu M; Zhang YJ; Shao Q; Liu XJ; Xu L Radiat Oncol; 2019 Mar; 14(1):38. PubMed ID: 30836970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Variability in target volume delineation on CT scans of the breast. Hurkmans CW; Borger JH; Pieters BR; Russell NS; Jansen EP; Mijnheer BJ Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Aug; 50(5):1366-72. PubMed ID: 11483349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]