BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

561 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27789217)

  • 1. Reoperative Laparoscopic Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction Repair in Children: Safety and Efficacy of the Technique.
    Moscardi PR; Barbosa JA; Andrade HS; Mello MF; Cezarino BN; Oliveira LM; Srougi M; Dénes FT; Lopes RI
    J Urol; 2017 Mar; 197(3 Pt 1):798-804. PubMed ID: 27789217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Failed pyeloplasty in children: Is robot-assisted laparoscopic reoperative repair feasible?
    Asensio M; Gander R; Royo GF; Lloret J
    J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Apr; 11(2):69.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25791423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reoperative laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children: comparison with open surgery.
    Piaggio LA; Noh PH; González R
    J Urol; 2007 May; 177(5):1878-82. PubMed ID: 17437840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reoperative robotic pyeloplasty in children.
    Davis TD; Burns AS; Corbett ST; Peters CA
    J Pediatr Urol; 2016 Dec; 12(6):394.e1-394.e7. PubMed ID: 27423387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robot-assisted laparoscopic reoperative repair for failed pyeloplasty in children: a safe and highly effective treatment option.
    Lindgren BW; Hagerty J; Meyer T; Cheng EY
    J Urol; 2012 Sep; 188(3):932-7. PubMed ID: 22819409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. From Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty to Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in Primary and Reoperative Repairs for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Children.
    Tam YH; Pang KKY; Wong YS; Chan KW; Lee KH
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2018 Aug; 28(8):1012-1018. PubMed ID: 29641368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Reoperative Repair for Failed Pyeloplasty in Children: An Updated Series.
    Jacobson DL; Shannon R; Johnson EK; Gong EM; Liu DB; Flink CC; Meyer T; Cheng EY; Lindgren BW
    J Urol; 2019 May; 201(5):1005-1011. PubMed ID: 30395839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus open pyeloplasty for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children.
    Abdel-Karim AM; Fahmy A; Moussa A; Rashad H; Elbadry M; Badawy H; Hammady A
    J Pediatr Urol; 2016 Dec; 12(6):401.e1-401.e6. PubMed ID: 27614698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Which is better--retroperitoneoscopic or laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children?
    Canon SJ; Jayanthi VR; Lowe GJ
    J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 2):1791-5; discussion 1795. PubMed ID: 17707427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of open and laparoscopic pyeloplasty in ureteropelvic junction obstruction surgery: report of 49 cases.
    Umari P; Lissiani A; Trombetta C; Belgrano E
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2011 Dec; 83(4):169-74. PubMed ID: 22670313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction Following Open Pyeloplasty in Children.
    Powell C; Gatti JM; Juang D; Murphy JP
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2015 Oct; 25(10):858-63. PubMed ID: 26488107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Failed pyeloplasty in children: comparative analysis of retrograde endopyelotomy versus redo pyeloplasty.
    Braga LH; Lorenzo AJ; Skeldon S; Dave S; Bagli DJ; Khoury AE; Pippi Salle JL; Farhat WA
    J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2571-5; discussion 2575. PubMed ID: 17945304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Outcomes of Re-Intervention for Laparoscopic Transperitoneal Pyeloplasty in Children.
    Leung L; Chan IH; Chung PH; Lan LC; Wong KK; Tam PK
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2016 Apr; 26(4):318-23. PubMed ID: 26799751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children younger than 2 years.
    Cascio S; Tien A; Chee W; Tan HL
    J Urol; 2007 Jan; 177(1):335-8. PubMed ID: 17162086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Laparoscopic reoperative pediatric pyeloplasty with robotic assistance.
    Passerotti CC; Nguyen HT; Eisner BH; Lee RS; Peters CA
    J Endourol; 2007 Oct; 21(10):1137-40. PubMed ID: 17949311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robotic computer-assisted pyeloplasty versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
    Weise ES; Winfield HN
    J Endourol; 2006 Oct; 20(10):813-9. PubMed ID: 17094760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Sundaram CP; Grubb RL; Rehman J; Yan Y; Chen C; Landman J; McDougall EM; Clayman RV
    J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2037-40. PubMed ID: 12771713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Salvage laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the worst case scenario: after both failed open repair and endoscopic salvage.
    Levin BM; Herrell SD
    J Endourol; 2006 Oct; 20(10):808-12. PubMed ID: 17094759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pediatric standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a comparative single institution study.
    Riachy E; Cost NG; Defoor WR; Reddy PP; Minevich EA; Noh PH
    J Urol; 2013 Jan; 189(1):283-7. PubMed ID: 23174238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Salvage laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the worst case scenario: after failed open repair and endoscopic salvage].
    Parma P; Samuelli A; Luciano M; Dall'Oglio B
    Urologia; 2014; 81 Suppl 23():S9-14. PubMed ID: 24665025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.