269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2778937)
1. New requirements for authors: signed statements of authorship responsibility and financial disclosure.
Lundberg GD; Flanagin A
JAMA; 1989 Oct; 262(14):2003-4. PubMed ID: 2778937
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Study discloses financial interests behind papers.
Wadman M
Nature; 1997 Jan; 385(6615):376. PubMed ID: 9009171
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Why be my colleague's keeper? Moral justifications for peer review.
Cain J
Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Oct; 5(4):531-40. PubMed ID: 11658232
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. New information for authors and readers. Group authorship, acknowledgements, and rejected manuscripts.
Glass RM
JAMA; 1992 Jul; 268(1):99. PubMed ID: 1482435
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Editorial ethics questioned.
Vogel G
Science; 1997 Feb; 275(5303):1055. PubMed ID: 11644901
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Prevalence of articles with honorary authors and ghost authors in peer-reviewed medical journals.
Flanagin A; Carey LA; Fontanarosa PB; Phillips SG; Pace BP; Lundberg GD; Rennie D
JAMA; 1998 Jul; 280(3):222-4. PubMed ID: 9676661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Meeting our ethical obligations in medical publishing: responsibilities of editors, authors, and readers of peer-reviewed journals.
Albert DM; Liesegang TJ; Schachat AP
Arch Ophthalmol; 2005 May; 123(5):684-6. PubMed ID: 15883290
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Ethical guidelines for publications of research.
Endocrine Society. Council
J Clin Endocrinol Metab; 1998 Jan; 83(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 11645018
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Editorial ethics.
Benatar SR
BMJ; 1998 Jan; 316(7125):155-6. PubMed ID: 11645021
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Scientific misconduct and editorial and peer review processes.
Fox MF
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):298-309. PubMed ID: 11653366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Parafraud in biology.
Hillman H
Sci Eng Ethics; 1997 Apr; 3(2):121-36. PubMed ID: 11657883
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Inappropriate authorship in collaborative science research.
Pennock RT
Public Aff Q; 1996 Oct; 10(4):379-93. PubMed ID: 11654653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. When authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable.
Rennie D; Yank V; Emanuel L
JAMA; 1997 Aug; 278(7):579-85. PubMed ID: 9268280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Believing what you read. Responsibilities of medical authors and editors.
Schiedermayer DL; Siegler M
Arch Intern Med; 1986 Oct; 146(10):2043-4. PubMed ID: 3767550
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Integrity of Authorship and Peer Review Practices: Challenges and Opportunities for Improvement.
Misra DP; Ravindran V; Agarwal V
J Korean Med Sci; 2018 Nov; 33(46):e287. PubMed ID: 30416407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Guidelines on authorship of medical papers.
Huth EJ
Ann Intern Med; 1986 Feb; 104(2):269-74. PubMed ID: 3511815
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. BMJ response to Dr. Gupta.
Craft N; Smith R
J Med Ethics; 1996 Aug; 22(4):245-6. PubMed ID: 11644865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Financial interest and its disclosure in scientific publications.
Krimsky S; Rothenberg LS
JAMA; 1998 Jul; 280(3):225-6. PubMed ID: 9676662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [AUTHORSHIP - A GREAT HONOR OR AN ONEROUS RESPONSIBILITY?].
Shemer A; Shoenfeld Y
Harefuah; 2017 Jun; 156(6):363-364. PubMed ID: 28661102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Medical journal cites misleading drug research.
Grady D
N Y Times Web; 1999 Nov; ():A18. PubMed ID: 11648133
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
