These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2779197)
21. Listeners' perceptions of consonants produced by esophageal and tracheoesophageal talkers. Doyle PC; Danhauer JL; Reed CG J Speech Hear Disord; 1988 Nov; 53(4):400-7. PubMed ID: 3184901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Stop identification from vocalic transition plus vowel segments of CV and VC syllables: a follow-up study. Ohde RN; Sharf DJ J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 Jan; 69(1):297-300. PubMed ID: 7217528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Intelligibility of average talkers in typical listening environments. Cox RM; Alexander GC; Gilmore C J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 May; 81(5):1598-608. PubMed ID: 3584697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of vowel duration as a cue for the voicing distinction in the following word-final consonant. Hogan JT; Rozsypal AJ J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 May; 67(5):1764-71. PubMed ID: 7372932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effects of Slow- and Fast-Acting Compression on Hearing-Impaired Listeners' Consonant-Vowel Identification in Interrupted Noise. Kowalewski B; Zaar J; Fereczkowski M; MacDonald EN; Strelcyk O; May T; Dau T Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518800870. PubMed ID: 30311552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: acoustic characteristics of vowels. Ferguson SH; Kewley-Port D J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Oct; 50(5):1241-55. PubMed ID: 17905909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Coding pitch differences in voiceless fricatives: Whispered relative to normal speech. Heeren WF J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):3427-38. PubMed ID: 26723300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Intra-oral pressure-based voicing control of electrolaryngeal speech with intra-oral vibrator. Takahashi H; Nakao M; Kikuchi Y; Kaga K J Voice; 2008 Jul; 22(4):420-9. PubMed ID: 17572066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The Influence of Vowel Identity, Vowel Production Variability, and Consonant Environment on Envelope Following Responses. Easwar V; Bridgwater E; Purcell D Ear Hear; 2021; 42(3):662-672. PubMed ID: 33577218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Perceptual contributions to monosyllabic word intelligibility: segmental, lexical, and noise replacement factors. Fogerty D; Humes LE J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Nov; 128(5):3114-25. PubMed ID: 21110607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Contribution of consonant versus vowel information to sentence intelligibility for young normal-hearing and elderly hearing-impaired listeners. Kewley-Port D; Burkle TZ; Lee JH J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2365-75. PubMed ID: 17902871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The phonological representation of [voice] in speech perception. Jongman A; Sereno JA; Raaijmakers M; Lahiri A Lang Speech; 1992; 35 ( Pt 1-2)():137-52. PubMed ID: 1287384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Multiband product rule and consonant identification. Li F; Allen JB J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jul; 126(1):347-53. PubMed ID: 19603891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Cross-language identification of consonants. Part 1. Korean perception of English. Schmidt AM J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 May; 99(5):3201-11. PubMed ID: 8642126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]