487 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27792474)
1. Comparison of coarse coal dust sampling techniques in a laboratory-simulated longwall section.
Patts JR; Barone TL
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2017 May; 14(5):323-334. PubMed ID: 27792474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the CAS-POL and IOM samplers for determining the knockdown efficiencies of water sprays on float coal dust.
Seaman CE; Shahan MR; Beck TW; Mischler SE
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2018 Mar; 15(3):214-225. PubMed ID: 29200377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sampling and analysis method for measuring airborne coal dust mass in mixtures with limestone (rock) dust.
Barone TL; Patts JR; Janisko SJ; Colinet JF; Patts LD; Beck TW; Mischler SE
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2016; 13(4):284-92. PubMed ID: 26618374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Determining the spatial variability of personal sampler inlet locations.
Vinson R; Volkwein J; McWilliams L
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Sep; 4(9):708-14. PubMed ID: 17654226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Equivalency of a personal dust monitor to the current United States coal mine respirable dust sampler.
Page SJ; Volkwein JC; Vinson RP; Joy GJ; Mischler SE; Tuchman DP; McWilliams LJ
J Environ Monit; 2008 Jan; 10(1):96-101. PubMed ID: 18175022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of mass concentrations determined with personal respirable coal mine dust samplers operating at 1.2 liters per minute and the Casella 113A gravimetric sampler (MRE).
Treaftis HN; Gero AJ; Kacsmar PM; Tomb TF
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1984 Dec; 45(12):826-32. PubMed ID: 6517028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance of personal inhalable aerosol samplers in very slowly moving air when facing the aerosol source.
Witschger O; Grinshpun SA; Fauvel S; Basso G
Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Jun; 48(4):351-68. PubMed ID: 15191944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A headset-mounted mini sampler for measuring exposure to welding aerosol in the breathing zone.
Lidén G; Surakka J
Ann Occup Hyg; 2009 Mar; 53(2):99-116. PubMed ID: 19196747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Passive personal air sampling of dust in a working environment-A pilot study.
Shirdel M; Bergdahl IA; Andersson BM; Wingfors H; Sommar JN; Liljelind IE
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2019 Oct; 16(10):675-684. PubMed ID: 31442106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Characterization of airborne float coal dust emitted during continuous mining, longwall mining and belt transport.
Shahan MR; Seaman CE; Beck TW; Colinet JF; Mischler SE
Min Eng; 2017 Sep; 69(9):61-66. PubMed ID: 28936001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The evaluation and quantification of respirable coal and silica dust concentrations: a task-based approach.
Grové T; Van Dyk T; Franken A; Du Plessis J
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2014; 11(6):406-14. PubMed ID: 24380473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Problems in monitoring dust levels within mines.
Hearl FJ; Hewett P
Occup Med; 1993; 8(1):93-108. PubMed ID: 8456351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Submicrometer elemental carbon as a selective measure of diesel particulate matter in coal mines.
Birch ME; Noll JD
J Environ Monit; 2004 Oct; 6(10):799-806. PubMed ID: 15480493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Variability of particle size-specific fractions of personal coal mine dust exposures.
Seixas NS; Hewett P; Robins TG; Haney R
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1995 Mar; 56(3):243-50. PubMed ID: 7717269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sampling efficiency of modified 37-mm sampling cassettes using computational fluid dynamics.
Anthony TR; Sleeth D; Volckens J
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2016; 13(2):148-58. PubMed ID: 26513395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improving the UNC Passive Aerosol Sampler Model Based on Comparison with Commonly Used Aerosol Sampling Methods.
Shirdel M; Andersson BM; Bergdahl IA; Sommar JN; Wingfors H; Liljelind IE
Ann Work Expo Health; 2018 Mar; 62(3):328-338. PubMed ID: 29300818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance characteristics of the 10 mm respirable mass sampler: Part II--coal dust studies.
Caplan KJ; Doemeny LJ; Sorenson SD
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1977 Apr; 38(4):162-73. PubMed ID: 868754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Testing a revised inlet for the personal dust monitor.
Mischler SE; Tuchman DP; Cauda EG; Colinet JF; Rubinstein EN
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2019 Mar; 16(3):242-249. PubMed ID: 30620243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laboratory study of selected personal inhalable aerosol samplers.
Görner P; Simon X; Wrobel R; Kauffer E; Witschger O
Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Mar; 54(2):165-87. PubMed ID: 20147627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative study of an inhalable and a total dust sampler for personal sampling of dust and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the gas and particulate phase.
Notø H; Halgard K; Daae HL; Bentsen RK; Eduard W
Analyst; 1996 Sep; 121(9):1191-6. PubMed ID: 8831276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
