These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27792738)

  • 1. Rescaling of Spatio-Temporal Sensing in Eukaryotic Chemotaxis.
    Kamino K; Kondo Y
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0164674. PubMed ID: 27792738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bias in the gradient-sensing response of chemotactic cells.
    Skupsky R; McCann C; Nossal R; Losert W
    J Theor Biol; 2007 Jul; 247(2):242-58. PubMed ID: 17462672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Models of eukaryotic gradient sensing: application to chemotaxis of amoebae and neutrophils.
    Levchenko A; Iglesias PA
    Biophys J; 2002 Jan; 82(1 Pt 1):50-63. PubMed ID: 11751295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Receptor noise limitations on chemotactic sensing.
    Rappel WJ; Levine H
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2008 Dec; 105(49):19270-5. PubMed ID: 19064934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Determining whether observed eukaryotic cell migration indicates chemotactic responsiveness or random chemokinetic motion.
    Szatmary AC; Nossal R
    J Theor Biol; 2017 Jul; 425():103-112. PubMed ID: 28501636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Local excitation, global inhibition mechanism for gradient sensing: an interactive applet.
    Kutscher B; Devreotes P; Iglesias PA
    Sci STKE; 2004 Feb; 2004(219):pl3. PubMed ID: 14872096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stochastic signal processing and transduction in chemotactic response of eukaryotic cells.
    Ueda M; Shibata T
    Biophys J; 2007 Jul; 93(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 17416630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A mechanistic model for eukaryotic gradient sensing: spontaneous and induced phosphoinositide polarization.
    Subramanian KK; Narang A
    J Theor Biol; 2004 Nov; 231(1):49-67. PubMed ID: 15363929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Simulations of chemotaxis and random motility in 2D random porous domains.
    Jabbarzadeh E; Abrams CF
    Bull Math Biol; 2007 Feb; 69(2):747-64. PubMed ID: 17216402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spontaneous polarization in eukaryotic gradient sensing: a mathematical model based on mutual inhibition of frontness and backness pathways.
    Narang A
    J Theor Biol; 2006 Jun; 240(4):538-53. PubMed ID: 16343548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of the signal transduction properties of a module of spatial sensing in eukaryotic chemotaxis.
    Krishnan J; Iglesias PA
    Bull Math Biol; 2003 Jan; 65(1):95-128. PubMed ID: 12597118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A simulation environment for directional sensing as a phase separation process.
    de Candia A; Gamba A; Cavalli F; Coniglio A; Di Talia S; Bussolino F; Serini G
    Sci STKE; 2007 Mar; 2007(378):pl1. PubMed ID: 17374853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neutrophil migration under spatially-varying chemoattractant gradient profiles.
    Halilovic I; Wu J; Alexander M; Lin F
    Biomed Microdevices; 2015; 17(3):9963. PubMed ID: 25998723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mathematics of experimentally generated chemoattractant gradients.
    Postma M; van Haastert PJ
    Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 571():473-88. PubMed ID: 19763986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stochastic control of spontaneous signal generation for gradient sensing in chemotaxis.
    Naoki H; Sakumura Y; Ishii S
    J Theor Biol; 2008 Nov; 255(2):259-66. PubMed ID: 18789338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How geometry and internal bias affect the accuracy of eukaryotic gradient sensing.
    Hu B; Chen W; Rappel WJ; Levine H
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2011 Feb; 83(2 Pt 1):021917. PubMed ID: 21405873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cells navigate with a local-excitation, global-inhibition-biased excitable network.
    Xiong Y; Huang CH; Iglesias PA; Devreotes PN
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2010 Oct; 107(40):17079-86. PubMed ID: 20864631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The molecular genetics of chemotaxis: sensing and responding to chemoattractant gradients.
    Firtel RA; Chung CY
    Bioessays; 2000 Jul; 22(7):603-15. PubMed ID: 10878573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A spatially restricted increase in receptor mobility is involved in directional sensing during Dictyostelium discoideum chemotaxis.
    de Keijzer S; Sergé A; van Hemert F; Lommerse PH; Lamers GE; Spaink HP; Schmidt T; Snaar-Jagalska BE
    J Cell Sci; 2008 May; 121(Pt 10):1750-7. PubMed ID: 18469015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Distinguishing modes of eukaryotic gradient sensing.
    Skupsky R; Losert W; Nossal RJ
    Biophys J; 2005 Oct; 89(4):2806-23. PubMed ID: 16085764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.