294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27792916)
1. The effect of information on beef husbandry systems on consumers' preferences and willingness to pay.
Risius A; Hamm U
Meat Sci; 2017 Feb; 124():9-14. PubMed ID: 27792916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Do consumers prefer pasture-raised dual-purpose cattle when considering meat products? A hypothetical discrete choice experiment for the case of minced beef.
Schulze M; Spiller A; Risius A
Meat Sci; 2021 Jul; 177():108494. PubMed ID: 33780871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Emerging markets for imported beef in China: Results from a consumer choice experiment in Beijing.
Ortega DL; Hong SJ; Wang HH; Wu L
Meat Sci; 2016 Nov; 121():317-323. PubMed ID: 27395825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intensive vs. free-range organic beef. A preference study through consumer liking and conjoint analysis.
García-Torres S; López-Gajardo A; Mesías FJ
Meat Sci; 2016 Apr; 114():114-120. PubMed ID: 26771143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Seasonality effects on consumers' preferences over quality attributes of different beef products.
Ardeshiri A; Sampson S; Swait J
Meat Sci; 2019 Nov; 157():107868. PubMed ID: 31234027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Beef quality labels: A combination of sensory acceptance test, stated willingness to pay, and choice-based conjoint analysis.
Meyerding SGH; Gentz M; Altmann B; Meier-Dinkel L
Appetite; 2018 Aug; 127():324-333. PubMed ID: 29792892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Do demographic and beef eating preferences impact on South African consumers' willingness to pay (WTP) for graded beef?
Strydom P; Burrow H; Polkinghorne R; Thompson J
Meat Sci; 2019 Apr; 150():122-130. PubMed ID: 30677552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How important is local food to organic-minded consumers?
Hempel C; Hamm U
Appetite; 2016 Jan; 96():309-318. PubMed ID: 26432955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Where's the beef? Retail channel choice and beef preferences in Argentina.
Colella F; Ortega DL
Meat Sci; 2017 Nov; 133():86-94. PubMed ID: 28662454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Using the animal to the last bit: Consumer preferences for different beef cuts.
Scozzafava G; Corsi AM; Casini L; Contini C; Loose SM
Appetite; 2016 Jan; 96():70-79. PubMed ID: 26363423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How do human values influence the beef preferences of consumer segments regarding animal welfare and environmentally friendly production?
Sonoda Y; Oishi K; Chomei Y; Hirooka H
Meat Sci; 2018 Dec; 146():75-86. PubMed ID: 30103081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Beef consumer segment profiles based on information source usage in Poland.
Żakowska-Biemans S; Pieniak Z; Gutkowska K; Wierzbicki J; Cieszyńska K; Sajdakowska M; Kosicka-Gębska M
Meat Sci; 2017 Feb; 124():105-113. PubMed ID: 27865127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Beef meat preferences of consumers from Northwest Italy: Analysis of choice attributes.
Merlino VM; Borra D; Girgenti V; Dal Vecchio A; Massaglia S
Meat Sci; 2018 Sep; 143():119-128. PubMed ID: 29738962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dutch Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Broiler Welfare.
Mulder M; Zomer S
J Appl Anim Welf Sci; 2017; 20(2):137-154. PubMed ID: 28166413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Would You Buy Plant-Based Beef Patties? A Survey on Product Attribute Preference and Willingness to Pay among Consumers in Liaoning Province, China.
Zhou M; Guan B; Huang L
Nutrients; 2022 Oct; 14(20):. PubMed ID: 36297077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How Consumers in the UK and Spain Value the Coexistence of the Claims Low Fat, Local, Organic and Low Greenhouse Gas Emissions.
Akaichi F; Revoredo Giha C; Glenk K; Gil JM
Nutrients; 2020 Jan; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 31906308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Understanding the role of information and taste heterogeneity in consumer preferences for functional beef: The case of the omega-3 enriched burger.
Boncinelli F; Piracci G; Casini L
Meat Sci; 2021 Nov; 181():108614. PubMed ID: 34229235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of sequential information on consumers' willingness to pay for credence food attributes.
Botelho A; Dinis I; Lourenço-Gomes L; Moreira J; Costa Pinto L; Simões O
Appetite; 2017 Nov; 118():17-25. PubMed ID: 28760349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Consumer interest in environmental impact, safety, health and animal welfare aspects of modern pig production: Results of a cross-national choice experiment.
Grunert KG; Sonntag WI; Glanz-Chanos V; Forum S
Meat Sci; 2018 Mar; 137():123-129. PubMed ID: 29175765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Food with Information on Animal Welfare, Lean Meat Essence Detection, and Traceability.
Xu L; Yang X; Wu L; Chen X; Chen L; Tsai FS
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Sep; 16(19):. PubMed ID: 31561621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
