BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27793724)

  • 1. Sensitivity analysis of gene ranking methods in phenotype prediction.
    deAndrés-Galiana EJ; Fernández-Martínez JL; Sonis ST
    J Biomed Inform; 2016 Dec; 64():255-264. PubMed ID: 27793724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Design of Biomedical Robots for Phenotype Prediction Problems.
    deAndrés-Galiana EJ; Fernández-Martínez JL; Sonis ST
    J Comput Biol; 2016 Aug; 23(8):678-92. PubMed ID: 27347715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of Microarray Preprocessing Techniques in Unraveling Biological Pathways.
    Deandrés-Galiana EJ; Fernández-Martínez JL; Saligan LN; Sonis ST
    J Comput Biol; 2016 Dec; 23(12):957-968. PubMed ID: 27494192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving the prediction of chemotherapeutic sensitivity of tumors in breast cancer via optimizing the selection of candidate genes.
    Jiang L; Huang L; Kuang Q; Zhang J; Li M; Wen Z; He L
    Comput Biol Chem; 2014 Apr; 49():71-8. PubMed ID: 24440656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accurate cancer classification using expressions of very few genes.
    Wang L; Chu F; Xie W
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2007; 4(1):40-53. PubMed ID: 17277412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving gene set analysis of microarray data by SAM-GS.
    Dinu I; Potter JD; Mueller T; Liu Q; Adewale AJ; Jhangri GS; Einecke G; Famulski KS; Halloran P; Yasui Y
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Jul; 8():242. PubMed ID: 17612399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ranking metrics in gene set enrichment analysis: do they matter?
    Zyla J; Marczyk M; Weiner J; Polanska J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 May; 18(1):256. PubMed ID: 28499413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hybrid genetic algorithm-neural network: feature extraction for unpreprocessed microarray data.
    Tong DL; Schierz AC
    Artif Intell Med; 2011 Sep; 53(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 21775110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robust gene selection methods using weighting schemes for microarray data analysis.
    Kang S; Song J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Sep; 18(1):389. PubMed ID: 28865426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Many accurate small-discriminatory feature subsets exist in microarray transcript data: biomarker discovery.
    Grate LR
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 6():97. PubMed ID: 15826317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tumor classification ranking from microarray data.
    Hewett R; Kijsanayothin P
    BMC Genomics; 2008 Sep; 9 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S21. PubMed ID: 18831787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative evaluation of gene-set analysis methods.
    Liu Q; Dinu I; Adewale AJ; Potter JD; Yasui Y
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Nov; 8():431. PubMed ID: 17988400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Considerations when using the significance analysis of microarrays (SAM) algorithm.
    Larsson O; Wahlestedt C; Timmons JA
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 6():129. PubMed ID: 15921534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mixture classification model based on clinical markers for breast cancer prognosis.
    Zeng T; Liu J
    Artif Intell Med; 2010; 48(2-3):129-37. PubMed ID: 20005686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Asymmetric microarray data produces gene lists highly predictive of research literature on multiple cancer types.
    Dawany NB; Tozeren A
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Sep; 11():483. PubMed ID: 20875095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multiclass cancer classification by support vector machines with class-wise optimized genes and probability estimates.
    Anand A; Suganthan PN
    J Theor Biol; 2009 Aug; 259(3):533-40. PubMed ID: 19406131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gene shaving using a sensitivity analysis of kernel based machine learning approach, with applications to cancer data.
    Alam MA; Shahjaman M; Rahman MF; Hossain F; Deng HW
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0217027. PubMed ID: 31120939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genomic data integration in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
    Fernández-Martínez JL; deAndrés-Galiana EJ; Sonis ST
    J Gene Med; 2017 Jan; 19(1-2):. PubMed ID: 27928896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Selection of differentially expressed genes in microarray data analysis.
    Chen JJ; Wang SJ; Tsai CA; Lin CJ
    Pharmacogenomics J; 2007 Jun; 7(3):212-20. PubMed ID: 16940966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Investigating the concordance of Gene Ontology terms reveals the intra- and inter-platform reproducibility of enrichment analysis.
    Zhang L; Zhang J; Yang G; Wu D; Jiang L; Wen Z; Li M
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2013 Apr; 14():143. PubMed ID: 23627640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.