154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2779381)
1. Protocol for the evaluation of automated blood coagulation instruments (coagulometers) for determination of the international normalised ratio.
Giddings JC; Hall P; Basterfield P; Kennedy DA; George AJ; Hall R; Lamont J; Stirling Y
Med Lab Sci; 1989 Jan; 46(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 2779381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Artifactual shortening of prothrombin time in a semi-automated coagulometer because of lipaemic plasma.
Kakkar N; Garg G
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2005 Apr; 48(2):240-2. PubMed ID: 16758681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Standardization Committee for Haematology. External Quality Assurance Program for General Hematology. Evaluation of the 1994 results].
Gutiérrez G; Jou JM; Carlos Reverter J; Martínez-Brotons F; Domingo A; Antonio Iriarte J; Remacha A; Rey J; Vives Corrons JL
Sangre (Barc); 1996 Apr; 41(2):115-23. PubMed ID: 9045351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Harmonization of animal clinical pathology testing in toxicity and safety studies. The Joint Scientific Committee for International Harmonization of Clinical Pathology Testing.
Weingand K; Brown G; Hall R; Davies D; Gossett K; Neptun D; Waner T; Matsuzawa T; Salemink P; Froelke W; Provost JP; Dal Negro G; Batchelor J; Nomura M; Groetsch H; Boink A; Kimball J; Woodman D; York M; Fabianson-Johnson E; Lupart M; Melloni E
Fundam Appl Toxicol; 1996 Feb; 29(2):198-201. PubMed ID: 8742316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of two automated coagulometers and the manual tilt-tube method for the determination of prothrombin time.
D'Angelo A; Seveso MP; D'Angelo SV; Gilardoni F; Macagni A; Manotti C; Bonini P
Am J Clin Pathol; 1989 Sep; 92(3):321-8. PubMed ID: 2773851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Comparative evaluation of 3 automated optical coagulation detection systems].
Houbouyan LL; Libaud DJ; Delemme J; Roussi JH; Goguel AF
Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1987; 45(1):57-69. PubMed ID: 3578937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of three types of automated coagulometers on the international sensitivity index (ISI) of rabbit, human, and recombinant human tissue factor preparations--a multicenter study.
van den Besselaar AM; Houbouyan LL; Aillaud MF; Denson KW; Johnston M; Kitchen S; Lindahl TL; Marren M; Martinuzzo ME; Droullé C; Tripodi A; Vergnes C
Thromb Haemost; 1999 Jan; 81(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 9974377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of citrate concentration in specimen collection tubes on the International Normalized Ratio.
Danielson CF; Davis K; Jones G; Benson J; Arney K; Martin J
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Sep; 121(9):956-9. PubMed ID: 9302927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Some aspects of newly developed instruments for blood coagulation tests].
Matsuo T; Kario K
Rinsho Byori; 1995 Dec; 43(12):1209-13. PubMed ID: 8569030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact of automation in the development of reagents and kits for automated methods in coagulation testing.
Martinoli JL; Amiral J
Semin Thromb Hemost; 1983 Jul; 9(3):194-205. PubMed ID: 6351254
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Tentative protocol for the evaluation of coagulometers, based on one-stage prothrombin time.
Shinton NK; Bloom AL; Colvin BT; Flute PT; Preston FE; Kennedy DA
Clin Lab Haematol; 1981; 3(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 7226722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The European Concerted Action on Anticoagulation (ECAA): field studies of coagulometer effects on the ISI of ECAA thromboplastins.
Poller L; van den Besselaar AM; Jespersen J; Tripodi A; Houghton D
Thromb Haemost; 1998 Oct; 80(4):615-23. PubMed ID: 9798981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Thrombin generation and coagulation factor activities: evaluation and comparison with the international normalized ratio.
Christensen TD; Jensen C; Larsen TB; Christiansen K; Sørensen B
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis; 2009 Jul; 20(5):358-65. PubMed ID: 19417631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of automation on prothrombin time test in NEQAS surveys.
Poller L; Thomson JM; Taberner DA
J Clin Pathol; 1989 Jan; 42(1):97-100. PubMed ID: 2921350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quality control and oral anticoagulation.
Preston FE
Thromb Haemost; 1995 Jul; 74(1):515-20. PubMed ID: 8578516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Current problems in quality control (QC) in hematology].
Tatsumi N; Takubo T; Tsuda I; Hino M
Rinsho Byori; 1997 Oct; 45(10):997-1002. PubMed ID: 9369079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality control in hematology.
Gulati GL; Hyun BH
Clin Lab Med; 1986 Dec; 6(4):675-88. PubMed ID: 3539479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Automation and prothrombin time: a United Kingdom field study of two widely used coagulometers.
Thomson JM; Taberner DA; Poller L
J Clin Pathol; 1990 Aug; 43(8):679-84. PubMed ID: 2401737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of EDTA samples for prothrombin time measurement in patients receiving oral anticoagulants.
Horsti J
Haematologica; 2001 Aug; 86(8):851-5. PubMed ID: 11522542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Standardization of coagulation tests.
Opartkiattikul N
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 1999; 30 Suppl 3():79-85. PubMed ID: 10926265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
