These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2779389)
1. Polyethylene glycol in the production of blood grouping reagents: some further advantages. Green C; McColl K; Gibson J; McGowan A; Yap PL Med Lab Sci; 1989 Jan; 46(1):81-2. PubMed ID: 2779389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of water-soluble polymers in the preparation of blood group diagnostic reagents. Spence LR; Chung A; Moore BP Med Lab Sci; 1985 Apr; 42(2):115-7. PubMed ID: 4068922 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Antibody identification using both automated solid-phase red cell adherence assay and a tube polyethylene glycol antiglobulin method. Yamada C; Serrano-Rahman L; Vasovic LV; Mohandas K; Uehlinger J Transfusion; 2008 Aug; 48(8):1693-8. PubMed ID: 18482178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mouse monoclonal anti-A and anti-B as routine blood grouping reagents: an evaluation. Munro AC; Inglis G; Blue A; Sheridan R; Mitchell R Med Lab Sci; 1982 Apr; 39(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 7121214 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Reagent control for continuous flow blood grouping systems. Knight RC Med Lab Sci; 1980 Oct; 37(4):349-50. PubMed ID: 7207044 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative sensitivity of solid phase versus PEG enhancement assays for detection and identification of RBC antibodies. Dwyre DM; Erickson Y; Heintz M; Elbert C; Strauss RG Transfus Apher Sci; 2006 Aug; 35(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 16905362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Conversion of plasma to 'serum' by heat treatment, for preparation of red cell grouping reagents. Northcott MJ; Sharp E Med Lab Sci; 1983 Apr; 40(2):177-8. PubMed ID: 6888202 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Typing of red cells on microplates by the low-ionic polybrene technique. Redman M; Malde R; Knight RC Med Lab Sci; 1986 Oct; 43(4):393-4. PubMed ID: 3657420 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Monoclonal anti-A and anti-B: development as cost-effective reagents. Voak D; Lennox E; Sacks S; Milstein C; Darnborough J Med Lab Sci; 1982 Apr; 39(2):109-22. PubMed ID: 6811828 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Decreased immunorejection in unmatched blood transfusions by attachment of methoxypolyethylene glycol on human red blood cells and the effect on D antigen. Tan Y; Qiu Y; Xu H; Ji S; Li S; Gong F; Zhang Y Transfusion; 2006 Dec; 46(12):2122-7. PubMed ID: 17176324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. LISS versus other low ionic suspension solutions for red cells. Knight R Br J Biomed Sci; 1997 Mar; 54(1):74. PubMed ID: 9167313 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the polyethylene glycol-indirect antiglobulin test for routine compatibility testing. Slater JL; Griswold DJ; Wojtyniak LS; Reisling MJ Transfusion; 1989 Oct; 29(8):686-8. PubMed ID: 2799893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [A comparative study of ABO blood grouping reagents]. Said N; Regaya F; Ben Ahmed F; Karoui M; Boukef K Tunis Med; 1995 Nov; 73(11):477-80. PubMed ID: 9506146 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Response to immunization with A and B human glycoproteins for the procurement of blood grouping reagents. Contreras M; Armitage SE; Hewitt PE Vox Sang; 1984; 47(3):224-35. PubMed ID: 6464421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of antisera for bloodstain grouping. II. Ss, Kell, Duffy, Kidd, and Gm/Km. Gaensslen RE; Lee HC; Pagliaro EM; Bremser JK; Carroll-Reho J J Forensic Sci; 1985 Jul; 30(3):655-76. PubMed ID: 4031801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An International Standard for specifying the minimum potency of anti-D blood-grouping reagents: evaluation of a candidate preparation in an international collaborative study. Thorpe SJ; Fox B; Heath AB; Scott M; de Haas M; Kochman S; Padilla A Vox Sang; 2006 Feb; 90(2):131-9. PubMed ID: 16430672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detection of red cell antibodies: current and future techniques. Knight RC; Poole GD Br J Biomed Sci; 1995 Dec; 52(4):297-305. PubMed ID: 8555784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Administration of olive oil followed by a low volume of polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution improves patient satisfaction with right-side colonic cleansing over administration of the conventional volume of polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution for colonoscopy preparation. Abut E; Guveli H; Yasar B; Bolukbas C; Bolukbas FF; Ince AT; Kendir T; Dalay AR; Kurdas OO Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Sep; 70(3):515-21. PubMed ID: 19555936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]