180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27794035)
1. Linguistic Strategies for Improving Informed Consent in Clinical Trials Among Low Health Literacy Patients.
Krieger JL; Neil JM; Strekalova YA; Sarge MA
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2017 Mar; 109(3):. PubMed ID: 27794035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Metaphor use and health literacy: a pilot study of strategies to explain randomization in cancer clinical trials.
Krieger JL; Parrott RL; Nussbaum JF
J Health Commun; 2011 Jan; 16(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 21128152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.
Perrenoud B; Velonaki VS; Bodenmann P; Ramelet AS
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Oct; 13(10):82-94. PubMed ID: 26571285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Social Determinants of Health and Informed Consent Comprehension for Pediatric Cancer Clinical Trials.
Aristizabal P; Nataraj S; Ma AK; Kumar NV; Perdomo BP; Martinez ME; Nodora J; Liu L; Lee E; Thornburg CD
JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Dec; 6(12):e2346858. PubMed ID: 38079173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comprehension of Randomization and Uncertainty in Cancer Clinical Trials Decision Making Among Rural, Appalachian Patients.
Krieger JL; Palmer-Wackerly A; Dailey PM; Krok-Schoen JL; Schoenberg NE; Paskett ED
J Cancer Educ; 2015 Dec; 30(4):743-8. PubMed ID: 25608719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An observational study showed that explaining randomization using gambling-related metaphors and computer-agency descriptions impeded randomized clinical trial recruitment.
Jepson M; Elliott D; Conefrey C; Wade J; Rooshenas L; Wilson C; Beard D; Blazeby JM; Birtle A; Halliday A; Stein R; Donovan JL; ; ; ; ;
J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Jul; 99():75-83. PubMed ID: 29505860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Simplification improves understanding of informed consent information in clinical trials regardless of health literacy level.
Kim EJ; Kim SH
Clin Trials; 2015 Jun; 12(3):232-6. PubMed ID: 25701156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimising informed consent for participants in a randomised controlled trial in rural Uganda: a comparative prospective cohort mixed-methods study.
Ditai J; Kanyago J; Nambozo MR; Odeke NM; Abeso J; Dusabe-Richards J; Olupot-Olupot P; Carrol ED; Medina-Lara A; Gladstone M; Storr J; Faragher B; Weeks AD
Trials; 2018 Dec; 19(1):699. PubMed ID: 30577809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Last resort or roll of the die? Exploring the role of metaphors in cancer clinical trials education among medically underserved populations.
Krieger JL
J Health Commun; 2014; 19(10):1161-77. PubMed ID: 23725021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Satisfying the needs of Japanese cancer patients: a comparative study of detailed and standard informed consent documents.
Sato K; Watanabe T; Katsumata N; Sato T; Ohashi Y
Clin Trials; 2014 Feb; 11(1):86-95. PubMed ID: 24408900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Participant comprehension of research for which they volunteer: a systematic review.
Montalvo W; Larson E
J Nurs Scholarsh; 2014 Nov; 46(6):423-31. PubMed ID: 25130209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improving the informed consent process for research subjects with low literacy: a systematic review.
Tamariz L; Palacio A; Robert M; Marcus EN
J Gen Intern Med; 2013 Jan; 28(1):121-6. PubMed ID: 22782275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interventions to Improve Patient Comprehension in Informed Consent for Medical and Surgical Procedures: An Updated Systematic Review.
Glaser J; Nouri S; Fernandez A; Sudore RL; Schillinger D; Klein-Fedyshin M; Schenker Y
Med Decis Making; 2020 Feb; 40(2):119-143. PubMed ID: 31948345
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Digitised audio questionnaire for assessment of informed consent comprehension in a low-literacy African research population: development and psychometric evaluation.
Afolabi MO; Bojang K; D'Alessandro U; Ota MO; Imoukhuede EB; Ravinetto R; Larson HJ; McGrath N; Chandramohan D
BMJ Open; 2014 Jun; 4(6):e004817. PubMed ID: 24961716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Participant Reactions to a Literacy-Focused, Web-Based Informed Consent Approach for a Genomic Implementation Study.
Kraft SA; Porter KM; Duenas DM; Guerra C; Joseph G; Lee SS; Shipman KJ; Allen J; Eubanks D; Kauffman TL; Lindberg NM; Anderson K; Zepp JM; Gilmore MJ; Mittendorf KF; Shuster E; Muessig KR; Arnold B; Goddard KAB; Wilfond BS
AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2021; 12(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 32981477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Consent for Research Involving Spanish- and English-Speaking Latinx Adults With Schizophrenia.
Barrio C; Fuentes D; Tibiriçá L; Hernandez M; Helu-Brown P; Golshan S; Palmer BW
Schizophr Bull; 2024 Apr; 50(3):673-683. PubMed ID: 37962384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of a modified informed consent process among vulnerable patients: a descriptive study.
Sudore RL; Landefeld CS; Williams BA; Barnes DE; Lindquist K; Schillinger D
J Gen Intern Med; 2006 Aug; 21(8):867-73. PubMed ID: 16881949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Literacy, comprehension, and informed consent in clinical research.
Raich PC; Plomer KD; Coyne CA
Cancer Invest; 2001; 19(4):437-45. PubMed ID: 11405182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Randomized, controlled trial of an easy-to-read informed consent statement for clinical trial participation: a study of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.
Coyne CA; Xu R; Raich P; Plomer K; Dignan M; Wenzel LB; Fairclough D; Habermann T; Schnell L; Quella S; Cella D;
J Clin Oncol; 2003 Mar; 21(5):836-42. PubMed ID: 12610182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comprehension and informed consent: assessing the effect of a short consent form.
Stunkel L; Benson M; McLellan L; Sinaii N; Bedarida G; Emanuel E; Grady C
IRB; 2010; 32(4):1-9. PubMed ID: 20853797
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
