721 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27794416)
1. Biennial lung cancer screening in Canada with smoking cessation-outcomes and cost-effectiveness.
Goffin JR; Flanagan WM; Miller AB; Fitzgerald NR; Memon S; Wolfson MC; Evans WK
Lung Cancer; 2016 Nov; 101():98-103. PubMed ID: 27794416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness of Lung Cancer Screening in Canada.
Goffin JR; Flanagan WM; Miller AB; Fitzgerald NR; Memon S; Wolfson MC; Evans WK
JAMA Oncol; 2015 Sep; 1(6):807-13. PubMed ID: 26226181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of integrating smoking cessation into lung cancer screening: a microsimulation model.
Evans WK; Gauvreau CL; Flanagan WM; Memon S; Yong JHE; Goffin JR; Fitzgerald NR; Wolfson M; Miller AB
CMAJ Open; 2020; 8(3):E585-E592. PubMed ID: 32963023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance and Cost-Effectiveness of Computed Tomography Lung Cancer Screening Scenarios in a Population-Based Setting: A Microsimulation Modeling Analysis in Ontario, Canada.
Ten Haaf K; Tammemägi MC; Bondy SJ; van der Aalst CM; Gu S; McGregor SE; Nicholas G; de Koning HJ; Paszat LF
PLoS Med; 2017 Feb; 14(2):e1002225. PubMed ID: 28170394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A cost-utility analysis of lung cancer screening and the additional benefits of incorporating smoking cessation interventions.
Villanti AC; Jiang Y; Abrams DB; Pyenson BS
PLoS One; 2013; 8(8):e71379. PubMed ID: 23940744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness of Low-Dose Computed Tomography With a Plasma-Based Biomarker for Lung Cancer Screening in China.
Zhao Z; Wang Y; Wu W; Yang Y; Du L; Dong H
JAMA Netw Open; 2022 May; 5(5):e2213634. PubMed ID: 35608858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness of a low-dose computed tomography screening programme for lung cancer in New Zealand.
Jaine R; Kvizhinadze G; Nair N; Blakely T
Lung Cancer; 2018 Oct; 124():233-240. PubMed ID: 30268467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness of computed tomography screening for lung cancer in the United States.
McMahon PM; Kong CY; Bouzan C; Weinstein MC; Cipriano LE; Tramontano AC; Johnson BE; Weeks JC; Gazelle GS
J Thorac Oncol; 2011 Nov; 6(11):1841-8. PubMed ID: 21892105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of Lung Cancer Screening Strategies Using Low-Dose Computed Tomography: a Systematic Review.
Raymakers AJN; Mayo J; Lam S; FitzGerald JM; Whitehurst DGT; Lynd LD
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2016 Aug; 14(4):409-418. PubMed ID: 26873091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Eligibility for low-dose computerized tomography screening among asbestos-exposed individuals.
Fitzgerald NR; Flanagan WM; Evans WK; Miller AB;
Scand J Work Environ Health; 2015 Jul; 41(4):407-12. PubMed ID: 25837734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Estimating the Cost-Effectiveness of Lung Cancer Screening with Low-Dose Computed Tomography for High-Risk Smokers in Australia.
Wade S; Weber M; Caruana M; Kang YJ; Marshall H; Manser R; Vinod S; Rankin N; Fong K; Canfell K
J Thorac Oncol; 2018 Aug; 13(8):1094-1105. PubMed ID: 29689434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Low-dose computed tomography for lung cancer screening in high-risk populations: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
Snowsill T; Yang H; Griffin E; Long L; Varley-Campbell J; Coelho H; Robinson S; Hyde C
Health Technol Assess; 2018 Nov; 22(69):1-276. PubMed ID: 30518460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-effectiveness of lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography in heavy smokers: a microsimulation modelling study.
Du Y; Sidorenkov G; Heuvelmans MA; Groen HJM; Vermeulen KM; Greuter MJW; de Bock GH
Eur J Cancer; 2020 Aug; 135():121-129. PubMed ID: 32563896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lung cancer screening with helical computed tomography in older adult smokers: a decision and cost-effectiveness analysis.
Mahadevia PJ; Fleisher LA; Frick KD; Eng J; Goodman SN; Powe NR
JAMA; 2003 Jan; 289(3):313-22. PubMed ID: 12525232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Low-dose chest computed tomography for lung cancer screening among Hodgkin lymphoma survivors: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Wattson DA; Hunink MG; DiPiro PJ; Das P; Hodgson DC; Mauch PM; Ng AK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Oct; 90(2):344-53. PubMed ID: 25104066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Lung Cancer Screening in the United States: A Comparative Modeling Study.
Criss SD; Cao P; Bastani M; Ten Haaf K; Chen Y; Sheehan DF; Blom EF; Toumazis I; Jeon J; de Koning HJ; Plevritis SK; Meza R; Kong CY
Ann Intern Med; 2019 Dec; 171(11):796-804. PubMed ID: 31683314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-effectiveness of screening for lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography: a systematic literature review.
Puggina A; Broumas A; Ricciardi W; Boccia S
Eur J Public Health; 2016 Feb; 26(1):168-75. PubMed ID: 26370440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Health and economic impact at a population level of both primary and secondary preventive lung cancer interventions: A model-based cost-effectiveness analysis.
Diaz M; Garcia M; Vidal C; Santiago A; Gnutti G; Gómez D; Trapero-Bertran M; Fu M;
Lung Cancer; 2021 Sep; 159():153-161. PubMed ID: 34352591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-effectiveness Evaluation of the 2021 US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation for Lung Cancer Screening.
Toumazis I; de Nijs K; Cao P; Bastani M; Munshi V; Ten Haaf K; Jeon J; Gazelle GS; Feuer EJ; de Koning HJ; Meza R; Kong CY; Han SS; Plevritis SK
JAMA Oncol; 2021 Dec; 7(12):1833-1842. PubMed ID: 34673885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of screening for lung cancer with low dose computed tomography.
Grover H; King W; Bhattarai N; Moloney E; Sharp L; Fuller L
Lung Cancer; 2022 Aug; 170():20-33. PubMed ID: 35700629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
