353 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27794476)
1. Comprehensive Staging of Uterine Carcinosarcoma Using a Multiquadrant Robotic Platform.
Dellinger TH; Wakabayashi MT; Han ES
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(4):531-532. PubMed ID: 27794476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robot-assisted laparoscopic transperitoneal infrarenal lymphadenectomy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer by single docking: Do we need a backup procedure?
Gucer F; Misirlioglu S; Ceydeli N; Taskiran C
J Robot Surg; 2018 Mar; 12(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 28255734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Single-Site Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Staging Surgery for Presumed Clinically Early-Stage Ovarian Cancer.
Yoo JG; Kim WJ; Lee KH
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(3):380-381. PubMed ID: 28911827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Feasibility of Robotic-Assisted Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in the Gynecologic Oncology Setting.
Moukarzel LA; Fader AN; Tanner EJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):258-263. PubMed ID: 27815041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopy for transperitoneal infrarenal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in patients with endometrial cancer.
Lee HJ; Lee YH; Chong GO; Hong DG; Lee YS
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2018 Mar; 44(3):547-555. PubMed ID: 29239059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robotic-Assisted Infrarenal Para-aortic Lymphadenectomy in Gynecological Cancers: Technique and Surgical Outcomes.
Mäenpää MM; Nieminen K; Tomás EI; Luukkaala TH; Mäenpää JU
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2018 Jun; 28(5):951-958. PubMed ID: 29683877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Single-port Robotic Pelvic Bulky Lymph Node Resection: A Case Report.
Gungor M; Takmaz O; Afsar S; Ozbasli E; Gundogan S
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(7):1030-1031. PubMed ID: 27311875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Para-aortic lymph node surgical staging in locally-advanced cervical cancer: comparison between robotic versus conventional laparoscopy.
Loverix L; Salihi RR; Van Nieuwenhuysen E; Concin N; Han S; van Gorp T; Vergote I
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Apr; 30(4):466-472. PubMed ID: 32079714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dual docking robotic surgical staging for high risk endometrial cancer.
Loaec C; Bats AS; Ngo C; Cornou C; Rossi L; Bensaid C; Nos C; Lecuru F
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Jun; 225():79-83. PubMed ID: 29679815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Extraperitoneal Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy by Robot-Assisted Laparoscopy.
da Costa AG; Borghesi Y; Hudry D; Faes J; Bresson L; Narducci F; Leblanc E
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(5):861-866. PubMed ID: 29337211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laparoendoscopic Single-site Surgery for Comprehensive Staging of Early Ovarian Cancer.
Chen S; Qi X; Chen L; Yi Q; Dong S; Xu L; Zheng Y
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(5):806. PubMed ID: 30278233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of perioperative outcomes and cost between robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopy for transperitoneal infrarenal para-aortic lymphadenectomy (TIPAL).
Coronado PJ; Fasero M; Magrina JF; Herraiz MA; Vidart JA
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(4):674-81. PubMed ID: 24486680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal laparoscopic or robotic para-aortic lymphadenectomy for staging of endometrial carcinoma.
Pakish J; Soliman PT; Frumovitz M; Westin SN; Schmeler KM; Reis RD; Munsell MF; Ramirez PT
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Feb; 132(2):366-71. PubMed ID: 24361579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robotic-assisted Transperitoneal Infrarenal Para-aortic Lymphadenectomy for Gynecological Malignancies: Comparison with a Laparoscopic Approach.
Lee HJ; Lee YH; Chong GO; Hong DG; Lee YS
Anticancer Res; 2017 Dec; 37(12):7087-7093. PubMed ID: 29187500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Laparoscopic para-aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy: experience with 150 patients and review of the literature.
Possover M; Krause N; Plaul K; Kühne-Heid R; Schneider A
Gynecol Oncol; 1998 Oct; 71(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 9784314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.
Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Indications and techniques for robotic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in gynecologic oncology.
Wisner KP; Gupta S; Ahmad S; Holloway RW
J Surg Oncol; 2015 Dec; 112(7):782-9. PubMed ID: 26288990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Robot assisted endometrial cancer staging - evaluation the first 100 operations and comparing the first andthe last 30 operations].
Marek R; Dzvinčuk P; Kudela M; Hambálek P; Maděrka M; Zapletalová J; Pilka R
Ceska Gynekol; 2015 Oct; 80(5):324-32. PubMed ID: 26606116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improving Double Docking for Robot-assisted Para-aortic Lymphadenectomy in Endometrial Cancer Staging: Technique and Surgical Outcomes.
Ekdahl L; Salehi S; Falconer H
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(5):818-24. PubMed ID: 27063093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robot-assisted extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy (RAePAL) performed with the bipolar cutting method.
Yanai S; Kanno K; Aiko K; Ando M
J Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Jan; 32(1):e6. PubMed ID: 33185047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
