BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

566 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27796448)

  • 1. Assessment of tissue heterogeneity using diffusion tensor and diffusion kurtosis imaging for grading gliomas.
    Raja R; Sinha N; Saini J; Mahadevan A; Rao KN; Swaminathan A
    Neuroradiology; 2016 Dec; 58(12):1217-1231. PubMed ID: 27796448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative analysis of the diffusion kurtosis imaging and diffusion tensor imaging in grading gliomas, predicting tumour cell proliferation and IDH-1 gene mutation status.
    Zhao J; Wang YL; Li XB; Hu MS; Li ZH; Song YK; Wang JY; Tian YS; Liu DW; Yan X; Jiang L; Yang ZY; Chu JP
    J Neurooncol; 2019 Jan; 141(1):195-203. PubMed ID: 30414095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Histogram analysis of diffusion kurtosis imaging derived maps may distinguish between low and high grade gliomas before surgery.
    Qi XX; Shi DF; Ren SX; Zhang SY; Li L; Li QC; Guan LM
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Apr; 28(4):1748-1755. PubMed ID: 29143940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Voxel-based clustered imaging by multiparameter diffusion tensor images for glioma grading.
    Inano R; Oishi N; Kunieda T; Arakawa Y; Yamao Y; Shibata S; Kikuchi T; Fukuyama H; Miyamoto S
    Neuroimage Clin; 2014; 5():396-407. PubMed ID: 25180159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Grading of Gliomas by Using Monoexponential, Biexponential, and Stretched Exponential Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging and Diffusion Kurtosis MR Imaging.
    Bai Y; Lin Y; Tian J; Shi D; Cheng J; Haacke EM; Hong X; Ma B; Zhou J; Wang M
    Radiology; 2016 Feb; 278(2):496-504. PubMed ID: 26230975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of diffusion tensor imaging metrics for gliomas grading at 3 T.
    Server A; Graff BA; Josefsen R; Orheim TE; Schellhorn T; Nordhøy W; Nakstad PH
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Mar; 83(3):e156-65. PubMed ID: 24457139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gliomas: diffusion kurtosis MR imaging in grading.
    Van Cauter S; Veraart J; Sijbers J; Peeters RR; Himmelreich U; De Keyzer F; Van Gool SW; Van Calenbergh F; De Vleeschouwer S; Van Hecke W; Sunaert S
    Radiology; 2012 May; 263(2):492-501. PubMed ID: 22403168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Grading and proliferation assessment of diffuse astrocytic tumors with monoexponential, biexponential, and stretched-exponential diffusion-weighted imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging.
    Zhang J; Chen X; Chen D; Wang Z; Li S; Zhu W
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Dec; 109():188-195. PubMed ID: 30527302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Value of diffusion kurtosis imaging in assessing low-grade gliomas.
    Goryawala MZ; Heros DO; Komotar RJ; Sheriff S; Saraf-Lavi E; Maudsley AA
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Dec; 48(6):1551-1558. PubMed ID: 29573042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diffusional kurtosis imaging for differentiating between high-grade glioma and primary central nervous system lymphoma.
    Pang H; Ren Y; Dang X; Feng X; Yao Z; Wu J; Yao C; Di N; Ghinda DC; Zhang Y
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jul; 44(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 26588793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prediction of Isocitrate Dehydrogenase Genotype in Brain Gliomas with MRI: Single-Shell versus Multishell Diffusion Models.
    Figini M; Riva M; Graham M; Castelli GM; Fernandes B; Grimaldi M; Baselli G; Pessina F; Bello L; Zhang H; Bizzi A
    Radiology; 2018 Dec; 289(3):788-796. PubMed ID: 30277427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Textural features of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI derived model-free and model-based parameter maps in glioma grading.
    Xie T; Chen X; Fang J; Kang H; Xue W; Tong H; Cao P; Wang S; Yang Y; Zhang W
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Apr; 47(4):1099-1111. PubMed ID: 28845594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Deep Convolutional Radiomic Features on Diffusion Tensor Images for Classification of Glioma Grades.
    Zhang Z; Xiao J; Wu S; Lv F; Gong J; Jiang L; Yu R; Luo T
    J Digit Imaging; 2020 Aug; 33(4):826-837. PubMed ID: 32040669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of MR diffusion kurtosis and neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging in evaluating gliomas.
    Genç B; Aslan K; Özçağlayan A; İncesu L
    J Neuroimaging; 2023; 33(4):644-651. PubMed ID: 37170070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diffusion kurtosis imaging as an imaging biomarker for predicting prognosis of the patients with high-grade gliomas.
    Wang X; Gao W; Li F; Shi W; Li H; Zeng Q
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Nov; 63():131-136. PubMed ID: 31425809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Histogram analysis of diffusion kurtosis imaging estimates for in vivo assessment of 2016 WHO glioma grades: A cross-sectional observational study.
    Hempel JM; Schittenhelm J; Brendle C; Bender B; Bier G; Skardelly M; Tabatabai G; Castaneda Vega S; Ernemann U; Klose U
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Oct; 95():202-211. PubMed ID: 28987669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic performance of gliomas grading and IDH status decoding A comparison between 3D amide proton transfer APT and four diffusion-weighted MRI models.
    Guo H; Liu J; Hu J; Zhang H; Zhao W; Gao M; Zhang Y; Yang G; Cui Y
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2022 Dec; 56(6):1834-1844. PubMed ID: 35488516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differences in Gaussian diffusion tensor imaging and non-Gaussian diffusion kurtosis imaging model-based estimates of diffusion tensor invariants in the human brain.
    Lanzafame S; Giannelli M; Garaci F; Floris R; Duggento A; Guerrisi M; Toschi N
    Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2464. PubMed ID: 27147357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optic radiations evaluation in patients affected by high-grade gliomas: a side-by-side constrained spherical deconvolution and diffusion tensor imaging study.
    Mormina E; Arrigo A; Calamuneri A; Alafaci C; Tomasello F; Morabito R; Marino S; Longo M; Vinci SL; Granata F
    Neuroradiology; 2016 Nov; 58(11):1067-1075. PubMed ID: 27516100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Versus Standard Diffusion Imaging for Detection and Grading of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer.
    Roethke MC; Kuder TA; Kuru TH; Fenchel M; Hadaschik BA; Laun FB; Schlemmer HP; Stieltjes B
    Invest Radiol; 2015 Aug; 50(8):483-9. PubMed ID: 25867657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.