These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27796705)
1. Is video laryngoscopy really superior to direct laryngoscopy for emergency intubation in prehospital trauma patients? Xue FS; Liu YY; Li HX; Yang GZ Intern Emerg Med; 2017 Feb; 12(1):139-140. PubMed ID: 27796705 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing C-MAC videolaryngoscope with direct laryngoscopy for emergency intubation. Liu YY; Xue FS; Li HX; Yang GZ Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2017 Nov; 34(11):785-786. PubMed ID: 28984798 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Improvement in glottic visualisation by using the C-MAC PM video laryngoscope as a first-line device for out-of-hospital emergency tracheal intubation: An observational study. Hossfeld B; Frey K; Doerges V; Lampl L; Helm M Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2015 Jun; 32(6):425-31. PubMed ID: 25886716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Paramedic laryngoscopy in the simulated difficult airway: comparison of the Venner A.P. Advance and GlideScope Ranger video laryngoscopes. Butchart AG; Tjen C; Garg A; Young P Acad Emerg Med; 2011 Jul; 18(7):692-8. PubMed ID: 21762232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of video laryngoscopy use during urgent endotracheal intubation in the critically ill. Kory P; Guevarra K; Mathew JP; Hegde A; Mayo PH Anesth Analg; 2013 Jul; 117(1):144-9. PubMed ID: 23687228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of video, optical, and direct laryngoscopy by experienced tactical paramedics. Yun BJ; Brown CA; Grazioso CJ; Pozner CN; Raja AS Prehosp Emerg Care; 2014; 18(3):442-5. PubMed ID: 24460509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prehospital Glidescope video laryngoscopy for difficult airway management in a helicopter rescue program with anaesthetists. Struck MF; Wittrock M; Nowak A Eur J Emerg Med; 2011 Oct; 18(5):282-4. PubMed ID: 21430543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of success rates between two video laryngoscope systems used in a prehospital clinical trial. Burnett AM; Frascone RJ; Wewerka SS; Kealey SE; Evens ZN; Griffith KR; Salzman JG Prehosp Emerg Care; 2014; 18(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 24400965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The airway scope may be less effective for tracheal intubation under direct daylight in a prehospital environment. Xue FS; Yuan YJ; Wang Q; Xiong J Anesth Analg; 2011 Jan; 112(1):249; author reply 249-50. PubMed ID: 21173212 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Comparison of five video laryngoscopes and conventional direct laryngoscopy : Investigations on simple and simulated difficult airways on the intubation trainer]. Ruetzler K; Imach S; Weiss M; Haas T; Schmidt AR Anaesthesist; 2015 Jul; 64(7):513-9. PubMed ID: 26174747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Direct versus video laryngoscopic intubation by novice prehospital intubators with and without chest compressions: A pilot manikin study. Kim YM; Kang HG; Kim JH; Chung HS; Yim HW; Jeong SH Prehosp Emerg Care; 2011; 15(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 21034232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of personal protective equipment on prehospital endotracheal intubation performance in simulated manikin. Çağlar A; Kaçer İ; Hacımustafaoğlu M; Öztürk B; Öztürk S Australas Emerg Care; 2021 Sep; 24(3):235-239. PubMed ID: 33358480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Macintosh, McCoy and C-MAC D-Blade video laryngoscope intubation by prehospital emergency health workers: a simulation study. Yildirim A; Kiraz HA; Ağaoğlu İ; Akdur O Intern Emerg Med; 2017 Feb; 12(1):91-97. PubMed ID: 27001885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of three video laryngoscopy devices to direct laryngoscopy for intubating obese patients: a randomized controlled trial. Yumul R; Elvir-Lazo OL; White PF; Sloninsky A; Kaplan M; Kariger R; Naruse R; Parker N; Pham C; Zhang X; Wender RH J Clin Anesth; 2016 Jun; 31():71-7. PubMed ID: 27185681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. EMS Intubation Improves with King Vision Video Laryngoscopy. Jarvis JL; McClure SF; Johns D Prehosp Emerg Care; 2015; 19(4):482-9. PubMed ID: 25909850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use-Dependent Curvature Changes in the GlideRite® Reusable Intubation Stylet. Smith CR; Urdaneta F; Gravenstein N A A Case Rep; 2016 May; 6(10):299-304. PubMed ID: 27075422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of success rates using video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy by residents during a simulated pediatric emergency. Sylvia MJ; Maranda L; Harris KL; Thompson J; Walsh BM Simul Healthc; 2013 Jun; 8(3):155-61. PubMed ID: 23448854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparative trial of the GlideScope(R) video laryngoscope to direct laryngoscope in children with difficult direct laryngoscopy and an evaluation of the effect of blade size. Lee JH; Park YH; Byon HJ; Han WK; Kim HS; Kim CS; Kim JT Anesth Analg; 2013 Jul; 117(1):176-81. PubMed ID: 23687227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Success rates and endotracheal tube insertion times of experienced emergency physicians using five video laryngoscopes: a randomised trial in a simulated trapped car accident victim. Wetsch WA; Carlitscheck M; Spelten O; Teschendorf P; Hellmich M; Genzwürker HV; Hinkelbein J Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2011 Dec; 28(12):849-58. PubMed ID: 21986981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Inverse intubation in entrapped trauma casualties: a simulator based, randomised cross-over comparison of direct, indirect and video laryngoscopy. Schober P; Krage R; van Groeningen D; Loer SA; Schwarte LA Emerg Med J; 2014 Dec; 31(12):959-63. PubMed ID: 24005641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]