175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27797094)
1. Comparison of the techniques for the identification of the epidural space using the loss-of-resistance technique or an automated syringe - results of a randomized double-blind study.
Duniec L; Nowakowski P; Sieczko J; Chlebus M; Łazowski T
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther; 2016; 48(4):228-233. PubMed ID: 27797094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Randomized comparison of two methods of the epidural space identification during regional labour analgesia.
Duniec L; Bilawicz J; Chlebus M; Pietrzak B; Wielgos M
Ginekol Pol; 2019; 90(5):279-284. PubMed ID: 30984999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A 'membrane in syringe' technique that allows identification of the epidural space with saline while avoids injection of air into the epidural space.
Lin BC; Chen KB; Chang CS; Wu KC; Liu YC; Chen CC; Wu RS
Acta Anaesthesiol Sin; 2002 Jun; 40(2):55-60. PubMed ID: 12194391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Episure Autodetect syringe, a loss-of-resistance technique for locating the epidural space, used in pediatric patients.
Tielens LK; Bruhn J; Vogt M; van Geffen GJ; Scheffer GJ
Paediatr Anaesth; 2013 Aug; 23(8):747-50. PubMed ID: 23763707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of spring-loaded, loss of resistance and hanging drop techniques in lumbar epidural blocks.
Gülen G; Akkaya T; Ozkan D; Kaydul M; Gözaydin O; Gümüş H
Agri; 2012; 24(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 22399127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A dual-chambered syringe that allows identification of the epidural space using the loss of resistance technique with air and with saline.
Candido KD; Winnie AP
Reg Anesth; 1992; 17(3):163-5. PubMed ID: 1606099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Epidrum, Epi-Jet, and Loss of Resistance syringe techniques for identifying the epidural space in obstetric patients.
Kartal S; Kösem B; Kılınç H; Köşker H; Karabayırlı S; Çimen NK; Demircioğlu RI
Niger J Clin Pract; 2017 Aug; 20(8):992-997. PubMed ID: 28891544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Posterior epidural space depth: safety of the loss of resistance and hanging drop techniques.
Hoffmann VL; Vercauteren MP; Vreugde JP; Hans GH; Coppejans HC; Adriaensen HA
Br J Anaesth; 1999 Nov; 83(5):807-9. PubMed ID: 10690148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Identification of the epidural space: loss of resistance with air, lidocaine, or the combination of air and lidocaine.
Evron S; Sessler D; Sadan O; Boaz M; Glezerman M; Ezri T
Anesth Analg; 2004 Jul; 99(1):245-250. PubMed ID: 15281538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A proposal of a simple epidural simulator for training novice anesthesiologists.
Jeong SM; Choi JM; Kim JH; Yoo H; Lee S; Seo H; Kim S; Kim SH
J Anesth; 2016 Aug; 30(4):591-5. PubMed ID: 27193185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A pilot study to compare epidural identification and catheterization using a saline-filled syringe versus a continuous hydrostatic pressure system.
Samhan YM; El-Sabae HH; Khafagy HF; Maher MA
J Anesth; 2013 Aug; 27(4):607-10. PubMed ID: 23408046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The learning curve associated with the epidural technique using the Episure™ AutoDetect™ versus conventional glass syringe: an open-label, randomized, controlled, crossover trial of experienced anesthesiologists in obstetric patients.
Carabuena JM; Mitani AM; Liu X; Kodali BS; Tsen LC
Anesth Analg; 2013 Jan; 116(1):145-54. PubMed ID: 23223103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Investigating the use of non-loss of resistance syringes for epidural insertion: experience on a mannequin.
Gladwin J; Maese S; Ballisat B
Int J Obstet Anesth; 2022 Nov; 52():103595. PubMed ID: 36137451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Usefulness of Epidrum for teaching identification of the epidural space].
Hirabayashi T; Kawamata T; Sakamoto A; Ikeno S; Minemura H; Ide S; Kurato T; Kawamata M
Masui; 2011 Sep; 60(9):1078-81. PubMed ID: 21950041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Epidrum(®): a new device to identify the epidural space with an epidural Tuohy needle.
Sawada A; Kii N; Yoshikawa Y; Yamakage M
J Anesth; 2012 Apr; 26(2):292-5. PubMed ID: 22081113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the hanging-drop technique and running-drip method for identifying the epidural space in dogs.
Martinez-Taboada F; Redondo JI
Vet Anaesth Analg; 2017 Mar; 44(2):329-336. PubMed ID: 28214220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ultrasound control for presumed difficult epidural puncture.
Grau T; Leipold RW; Conradi R; Martin E
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2001 Jul; 45(6):766-71. PubMed ID: 11421838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does epidural injection of physiological saline facilitate the advancement of catheters?
Geernaert K; Hody JL; Adriaensen H; Van Steenberge A
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 1993 Sep; 10(5):349-51. PubMed ID: 11767424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mathematical analysis of epidural space location.
Rodiera J; Calabuig R; Aliaga L; Espinosa W; Hobeich F; Oferil F; Gual A
Int J Clin Monit Comput; 1995; 12(4):213-7. PubMed ID: 8820327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Depth of the thoracic epidural space in children.
Masir F; Driessen JJ; Thies KC; Wijnen MH; van Egmond J
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg; 2006; 57(3):271-5. PubMed ID: 17067139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
