219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27797247)
1. Comparison of Effectiveness in Differentiating Benign from Malignant Ovarian Masses between IOTA Simple Rules and Subjective Sonographic Assessment.
Tongsong T; Tinnangwattana D; Vichak-Ururote L; Tontivuthikul P; Charoenratana C; Lerthiranwong T
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(9):4377-4380. PubMed ID: 27797247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. IOTA simple rules in differentiating between benign and malignant ovarian tumors.
Tantipalakorn C; Wanapirak C; Khunamornpong S; Sukpan K; Tongsong T
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(13):5123-6. PubMed ID: 25040961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Prospective External Validation of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Simple Rules in the Hands of Level I and II Examiners.
Knafel A; Banas T; Nocun A; Wiechec M; Jach R; Ludwin A; Kabzinska-Turek M; Pietrus M; Pitynski K
Ultraschall Med; 2016 Oct; 37(5):516-523. PubMed ID: 26126150
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective external validation of IOTA three-step strategy for characterizing and classifying adnexal masses and retrospective assessment of alternative two-step strategy using simple-rules risk.
Hidalgo JJ; Ros F; Aubá M; Errasti T; Olartecoechea B; Ruiz-Zambrana Á; Alcázar JL
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 May; 53(5):693-700. PubMed ID: 30353585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis simple rules and the risk of malignancy index to discriminate between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
Auekitrungrueng R; Tinnangwattana D; Tantipalakorn C; Charoenratana C; Lerthiranwong T; Wanapirak C; Tongsong T
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2019 Sep; 146(3):364-369. PubMed ID: 31206642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. IOTA Simple Rules in Differentiating between Benign and Malignant Adnexal Masses by Non-expert Examiners.
Tinnangwattana D; Vichak-Ururote L; Tontivuthikul P; Charoenratana C; Lerthiranwong T; Tongsong T
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(9):3835-8. PubMed ID: 25987045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lesion size affects diagnostic performance of IOTA logistic regression models, IOTA simple rules and risk of malignancy index in discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
Di Legge A; Testa AC; Ameye L; Van Calster B; Lissoni AA; Leone FP; Savelli L; Franchi D; Czekierdowski A; Trio D; Van Holsbeke C; Ferrazzi E; Scambia G; Timmerman D; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Sep; 40(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 22611001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance of IOTA Simple Rules, Simple Rules risk assessment, ADNEX model and O-RADS in differentiating between benign and malignant adnexal lesions in North American women.
Hiett AK; Sonek JD; Guy M; Reid TJ
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2022 May; 59(5):668-676. PubMed ID: 34533862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic performance of IOTA simple rules for adnexal masses classification: a comparison between two centers with different ovarian cancer prevalence.
Ruiz de Gauna B; Rodriguez D; Olartecoechea B; Aubá M; Jurado M; Gómez Roig MD; Alcázar JL
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Aug; 191():10-4. PubMed ID: 26066289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic value of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) simple rules versus pattern recognition to differentiate between malignant and benign ovarian masses.
Dakhly DMR; Gaafar HM; Sediek MM; Ibrahim MF; Momtaz M
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2019 Dec; 147(3):344-349. PubMed ID: 31520402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Simple ultrasound rules to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal masses before surgery: prospective validation by IOTA group.
Timmerman D; Ameye L; Fischerova D; Epstein E; Melis GB; Guerriero S; Van Holsbeke C; Savelli L; Fruscio R; Lissoni AA; Testa AC; Veldman J; Vergote I; Van Huffel S; Bourne T; Valentin L
BMJ; 2010 Dec; 341():c6839. PubMed ID: 21156740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. External validation of IOTA simple descriptors and simple rules for classifying adnexal masses.
Alcázar JL; Pascual MA; Graupera B; Aubá M; Errasti T; Olartecoechea B; Ruiz-Zambrana A; Hereter L; Ajossa S; Guerriero S
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Sep; 48(3):397-402. PubMed ID: 26748432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Association between the sonographer's experience and diagnostic performance of IOTA simple rules.
Ning CP; Ji X; Wang HQ; Du XY; Niu HT; Fang SB
World J Surg Oncol; 2018 Sep; 16(1):179. PubMed ID: 30185198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of IOTA simple rules for diagnosis of ovarian cancer: meta-analysis.
Nunes N; Ambler G; Foo X; Naftalin J; Widschwendter M; Jurkovic D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Nov; 44(5):503-14. PubMed ID: 24920435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interobserver agreement in describing adnexal masses using the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis simple rules in a real-time setting and using three-dimensional ultrasound volumes and digital clips.
Ruiz de Gauna B; Sanchez P; Pineda L; Utrilla-Layna J; Juez L; Alcázar JL
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jul; 44(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 24265132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Subjective assessment versus ultrasound models to diagnose ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Meys EM; Kaijser J; Kruitwagen RF; Slangen BF; Van Calster B; Aertgeerts B; Verbakel JY; Timmerman D; Van Gorp T
Eur J Cancer; 2016 May; 58():17-29. PubMed ID: 26922169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. IOTA simple rules for discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses: prospective external validation.
Alcázar JL; Pascual MÁ; Olartecoechea B; Graupera B; Aubá M; Ajossa S; Hereter L; Julve R; Gastón B; Peddes C; Sedda F; Piras A; Saba L; Guerriero S
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Oct; 42(4):467-71. PubMed ID: 23576304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sonographic Diagnosis of Tubal Cancer with IOTA Simple Rules Plus Pattern Recognition.
Tongsong T; Wanapirak C; Tantipalakorn C; Tinnangwattana D
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2017 Nov; 18(11):3011-3015. PubMed ID: 29172273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ultrasound examination, MRI, or ROMA for discriminating between inconclusive adnexal masses as determined by IOTA Simple Rules: a prospective study.
Chacon E; Arraiza M; Manzour N; Benito A; Mínguez JÁ; Vázquez-Vicente D; Castellanos T; Chiva L; Alcazar JL
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2023 Jun; 33(6):951-956. PubMed ID: 37055169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The use of sonographic subjective tumor assessment, IOTA logistic regression model 1, IOTA Simple Rules and GI-RADS system in the preoperative prediction of malignancy in women with adnexal masses.
Koneczny J; Czekierdowski A; Florczak M; Poziemski P; Stachowicz N; Borowski D
Ginekol Pol; 2017; 88(12):647-653. PubMed ID: 29303221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
