These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27797549)

  • 1. Does text contrast mediate binocular advantages in reading?
    Jainta S; Nikolova M; Liversedge SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Jan; 43(1):55-68. PubMed ID: 27797549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using a dichoptic moving window presentation technique to investigate binocular advantages during reading.
    Nikolova M; Jainta S; Blythe HI; Liversedge SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Feb; 43(2):265-280. PubMed ID: 27819454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of contrast on monocular versus binocular reading performance.
    Johansson J; Pansell T; Ygge J; Seimyr GÖ
    J Vis; 2014 May; 14(5):8. PubMed ID: 24829225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Binocular advantages for parafoveal processing in reading.
    Nikolova M; Jainta S; Blythe HI; Liversedge SP
    Vision Res; 2018 Apr; 145():56-63. PubMed ID: 29549000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Binocular fixation disparity in single word displays.
    Paterson KB; Jordan TR; Kurtev S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Dec; 35(6):1961-8. PubMed ID: 19968446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Monocular and binocular reading performance in subjects with normal binocular vision.
    Johansson J; Pansell T; Ygge J; Seimyr GÖ
    Clin Exp Optom; 2014 Jul; 97(4):341-8. PubMed ID: 24612111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Binocular coordination of the eyes during reading: word frequency and case alternation affect fixation duration but not fixation disparity.
    Juhasz BJ; Liversedge SP; White SJ; Rayner K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Sep; 59(9):1614-25. PubMed ID: 16873112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gaze-grasp coordination in obstacle avoidance: differences between binocular and monocular viewing.
    Grant S
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Dec; 233(12):3489-505. PubMed ID: 26298046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Binocular advantages in reading.
    Jainta S; Blythe HI; Liversedge SP
    Curr Biol; 2014 Mar; 24(5):526-30. PubMed ID: 24530062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Decline of monocular contrast sensitivity during binocular fixation].
    Kozawa R; Bingushi K
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2013 Feb; 83(6):536-45. PubMed ID: 23534261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reading with central scotomas: is there a binocular gain?
    Kabanarou SA; Rubin GS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Nov; 83(11):789-96. PubMed ID: 17106405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Vergence responses to vertical binocular disparity during lexical identification.
    Nikolova M; Jainta S; Blythe HI; Jones MO; Liversedge SP
    Vision Res; 2015 Jan; 106():27-35. PubMed ID: 25433156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Eye position changes during reading fixations are spatially selective.
    Inhoff AW; Solomon MS; Seymour BA; Radach R
    Vision Res; 2008 Mar; 48(8):1027-39. PubMed ID: 18313717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spelling ability selectively predicts the magnitude of disruption in unspaced text reading.
    Veldre A; Drieghe D; Andrews S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1612-1628. PubMed ID: 28414501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of word length during monocular viewing.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Kurtev S; Xu M
    Cortex; 2010 Jan; 46(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 19147129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of spatial frequency on binocular contrast inhibition.
    Pardhan S; Gilchrist J; Douthwaite W
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1989 Jan; 9(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 2594377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of aging, word frequency, and text stimulus quality on reading across the adult lifespan: Evidence from eye movements.
    Warrington KL; McGowan VA; Paterson KB; White SJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Nov; 44(11):1714-1729. PubMed ID: 29672115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. When two eyes are better than one in prehension: monocular viewing and end-point variance.
    Loftus A; Servos P; Goodale MA; Mendarozqueta N; Mon-Williams M
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Oct; 158(3):317-27. PubMed ID: 15164152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of flankers on contrast detection and discrimination in binocular, monocular, and dichoptic presentations.
    Maehara G; Huang PC; Hess RF
    J Vis; 2010 Apr; 10(4):13.1-15. PubMed ID: 20465333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Oculomotor and linguistic processing effects in reading dynamic horizontally scrolling text.
    Harvey H; Godwin HJ; Fitzsimmons G; Liversedge SP; Walker R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Mar; 43(3):518-536. PubMed ID: 28080114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.