These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27797702)

  • 1. Aggregating and Analyzing Daily Drinking Data in Clinical Trials: A Comparison of Type I Errors, Power, and Bias.
    Hallgren KA; Atkins DC; Witkiewitz K
    J Stud Alcohol Drugs; 2016 Nov; 77(6):986-991. PubMed ID: 27797702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Missing Data in Alcohol Clinical Trials with Binary Outcomes.
    Hallgren KA; Witkiewitz K; Kranzler HR; Falk DE; Litten RZ; O'Malley SS; Anton RF;
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2016 Jul; 40(7):1548-57. PubMed ID: 27254113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Power difference in a χ
    Miller ML; Roe DJ; Hu C; Bell ML
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Mar; 20(1):50. PubMed ID: 32122312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the analysis of composite measures of quality in medical research.
    Moineddin R; Meaney C; Grunfeld E
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Apr; 26(2):633-660. PubMed ID: 25296866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimating relative risks in multicenter studies with a small number of centers - which methods to use? A simulation study.
    Pedroza C; Truong VTT
    Trials; 2017 Nov; 18(1):512. PubMed ID: 29096682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. To adjust or not to adjust for baseline when analyzing repeated binary responses? The case of complete data when treatment comparison at study end is of interest.
    Jiang H; Kulkarni PM; Mallinckrodt CH; Shurzinske L; Molenberghs G; Lipkovich I
    Pharm Stat; 2015; 14(3):262-71. PubMed ID: 25866149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Application of robust estimating equations to the analysis of quantitative longitudinal data.
    Hu M; Lachin JM
    Stat Med; 2001 Nov; 20(22):3411-28. PubMed ID: 11746326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing denominator degrees of freedom approximations for the generalized linear mixed model in analyzing binary outcome in small sample cluster-randomized trials.
    Li P; Redden DT
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Apr; 15():38. PubMed ID: 25899170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of Approaches to Analyzing Continuous Correlated Eye Data When Sample Size Is Small.
    Huang J; Huang J; Chen Y; Ying GS
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2018 Feb; 25(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 28891730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cluster randomised trials with a binary outcome and a small number of clusters: comparison of individual and cluster level analysis method.
    Thompson JA; Leyrat C; Fielding KL; Hayes RJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Aug; 22(1):222. PubMed ID: 35962318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance of mixed effects models in the analysis of mediated longitudinal data.
    Blood EA; Cabral H; Heeren T; Cheng DM
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Feb; 10():16. PubMed ID: 20170503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Generalized estimating equations in cluster randomized trials with a small number of clusters: Review of practice and simulation study.
    Huang S; Fiero MH; Bell ML
    Clin Trials; 2016 Aug; 13(4):445-9. PubMed ID: 27094487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of single-case experimental count data using the linear mixed effects model: A simulation study.
    Declercq L; Jamshidi L; Fernández-Castilla B; Beretvas SN; Moeyaert M; Ferron JM; Van den Noortgate W
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Dec; 51(6):2477-2497. PubMed ID: 30105444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of adaptive treatment strategies based on longitudinal outcomes in sequential multiple assignment randomized trials.
    Li Z
    Stat Med; 2017 Feb; 36(3):403-415. PubMed ID: 27646957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of predictor approaches for longitudinal binary outcomes: application to anesthesiology data.
    Aktas Samur A; Coskunfirat N; Saka O
    PeerJ; 2014; 2():e648. PubMed ID: 25374787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of longitudinal binary data with missing data due to dropouts.
    Ali MW; Talukder E
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(6):993-1007. PubMed ID: 16279357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Non-linear mixed models in the analysis of mediated longitudinal data with binary outcomes.
    Blood EA; Cheng DM
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Jan; 12():5. PubMed ID: 22273051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Beyond repeated-measures analysis of variance: advanced statistical methods for the analysis of longitudinal data in anesthesia research.
    Ma Y; Mazumdar M; Memtsoudis SG
    Reg Anesth Pain Med; 2012; 37(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 22189576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cluster randomized trials with a small number of clusters: which analyses should be used?
    Leyrat C; Morgan KE; Leurent B; Kahan BC
    Int J Epidemiol; 2018 Feb; 47(1):321-331. PubMed ID: 29025158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Minimum number of clusters and comparison of analysis methods for cross sectional stepped wedge cluster randomised trials with binary outcomes: A simulation study.
    Barker D; D'Este C; Campbell MJ; McElduff P
    Trials; 2017 Mar; 18(1):119. PubMed ID: 28279222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.