These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27797779)

  • 1. JADOPPT: java based AutoDock preparing and processing tool.
    García-Pérez C; Peláez R; Therón R; Luis López-Pérez J
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Feb; 33(4):583-585. PubMed ID: 27797779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. jMetalCpp: optimizing molecular docking problems with a C++ metaheuristic framework.
    López-Camacho E; García Godoy MJ; Nebro AJ; Aldana-Montes JF
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Feb; 30(3):437-8. PubMed ID: 24273242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comprehensive evaluation of ten docking programs on a diverse set of protein-ligand complexes: the prediction accuracy of sampling power and scoring power.
    Wang Z; Sun H; Yao X; Li D; Xu L; Li Y; Tian S; Hou T
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2016 May; 18(18):12964-75. PubMed ID: 27108770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. NRGsuite: a PyMOL plugin to perform docking simulations in real time using FlexAID.
    Gaudreault F; Morency LP; Najmanovich RJ
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Dec; 31(23):3856-8. PubMed ID: 26249810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Performance of Several Docking Programs at Reproducing Protein-Macrolide-Like Crystal Structures.
    Castro-Alvarez A; Costa AM; Vilarrasa J
    Molecules; 2017 Jan; 22(1):. PubMed ID: 28106755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Critical assessment of the automated AutoDock as a new docking tool for virtual screening.
    Park H; Lee J; Lee S
    Proteins; 2006 Nov; 65(3):549-54. PubMed ID: 16988956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. DINC 2.0: A New Protein-Peptide Docking Webserver Using an Incremental Approach.
    Antunes DA; Moll M; Devaurs D; Jackson KR; Lizée G; Kavraki LE
    Cancer Res; 2017 Nov; 77(21):e55-e57. PubMed ID: 29092940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. AutoDock and AutoDockTools for Protein-Ligand Docking: Beta-Site Amyloid Precursor Protein Cleaving Enzyme 1(BACE1) as a Case Study.
    El-Hachem N; Haibe-Kains B; Khalil A; Kobeissy FH; Nemer G
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1598():391-403. PubMed ID: 28508374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biased Docking for Protein-Ligand Pose Prediction.
    Arcon JP; Turjanski AG; Martí MA; Forli S
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2266():39-72. PubMed ID: 33759120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. PSOVina: The hybrid particle swarm optimization algorithm for protein-ligand docking.
    Ng MC; Fong S; Siu SW
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2015 Jun; 13(3):1541007. PubMed ID: 25800162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. AutoDock Bias: improving binding mode prediction and virtual screening using known protein-ligand interactions.
    Arcon JP; Modenutti CP; Avendaño D; Lopez ED; Defelipe LA; Ambrosio FA; Turjanski AG; Forli S; Marti MA
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Oct; 35(19):3836-3838. PubMed ID: 30825370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fast, accurate, and reliable molecular docking with QuickVina 2.
    Alhossary A; Handoko SD; Mu Y; Kwoh CK
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Jul; 31(13):2214-6. PubMed ID: 25717194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Automatic clustering of docking poses in virtual screening process using self-organizing map.
    Bouvier G; Evrard-Todeschi N; Girault JP; Bertho G
    Bioinformatics; 2010 Jan; 26(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 19910307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of AutoDock and AutoDock Vina on the CASF-2013 Benchmark.
    Gaillard T
    J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Aug; 58(8):1697-1706. PubMed ID: 29989806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. GalaxyDock: protein-ligand docking with flexible protein side-chains.
    Shin WH; Seok C
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Dec; 52(12):3225-32. PubMed ID: 23198780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The consequences of scoring docked ligand conformations using free energy correlations.
    Spyrakis F; Amadasi A; Fornabaio M; Abraham DJ; Mozzarelli A; Kellogg GE; Cozzini P
    Eur J Med Chem; 2007 Jul; 42(7):921-33. PubMed ID: 17346861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Scoring functions for AutoDock.
    Hill AD; Reilly PJ
    Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1273():467-74. PubMed ID: 25753725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is It Reliable to Use Common Molecular Docking Methods for Comparing the Binding Affinities of Enantiomer Pairs for Their Protein Target?
    Ramírez D; Caballero J
    Int J Mol Sci; 2016 Apr; 17(4):. PubMed ID: 27104528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Docking studies on DNA intercalators.
    Gilad Y; Senderowitz H
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jan; 54(1):96-107. PubMed ID: 24303988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. PLIDflow: an open-source workflow for the online analysis of protein-ligand docking using galaxy.
    Ulzurrun E; Duarte Y; Perez-Wohlfeil E; Gonzalez-Nilo F; Trelles O
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Aug; 36(14):4203-4205. PubMed ID: 32415960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.