These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27799586)

  • 1. Modified Test Protocol Improves Sensitivity of the Stereo Fly Test.
    De La Cruz A; Morale SE; Jost RM; Kelly KR; Birch EE
    Am Orthopt J; 2016 Jan; 66(1):122-125. PubMed ID: 27799586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Testing distance stereoacuity with the Frisby-Davis 2 (FD2) test.
    Holmes JM; Fawcett SL
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Jan; 139(1):193-5. PubMed ID: 15652852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development of stereoscopic acuity: longitudinal study using a computer-based random-dot stereo test.
    Takai Y; Sato M; Tan R; Hirai T
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2005; 49(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 15692766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Characterizing the Randot Preschool stereotest: Testability, norms, reliability, specificity and sensitivity in children aged 2-11 years.
    Read JCA; Rafiq S; Hugill J; Casanova T; Black C; O'Neill A; Puyat V; Haggerty H; Smart K; Powell C; Taylor K; Clarke MP; Vancleef K
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0224402. PubMed ID: 31697704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Binocular non-stereoscopic cues can deceive clinical tests of stereopsis.
    Chopin A; Chan SW; Guellai B; Bavelier D; Levi DM
    Sci Rep; 2019 Apr; 9(1):5789. PubMed ID: 30962466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of a New, Filter-Free Stereopsis Test (BEST) With the Randot Stereotest in a Pediatric Cohort.
    Lagstein O; Hecht I; Anteby I
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2020 Mar; 57(2):129-135. PubMed ID: 32203597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. From suppression to stereoacuity: a composite binocular function score for clinical research.
    Webber AL; Wood JM; Thompson B; Birch EE
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2019 Jan; 39(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 30628744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. ASTEROID stereotest v1.0: lower stereo thresholds using smaller, denser and faster dots.
    Read JCA; Wong ZY; Yek X; Wong YX; Bachtoula O; Llamas-Cornejo I; Serrano-Pedraza I
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2020 Nov; 40(6):815-827. PubMed ID: 32989799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of a new Distance Randot stereoacuity test.
    Fu VL; Birch EE; Holmes JM
    J AAPOS; 2006 Oct; 10(5):419-23. PubMed ID: 17070476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Maximum angle of horizontal strabismus consistent with true stereopsis.
    Leske DA; Holmes JM
    J AAPOS; 2004 Feb; 8(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 14970796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Overestimation of stereo thresholds by the TNO stereotest is not due to global stereopsis.
    Vancleef K; Read JCA; Herbert W; Goodship N; Woodhouse M; Serrano-Pedraza I
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jul; 37(4):507-520. PubMed ID: 28337792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An evaluation of the agreement between contour-based circles and random dot-based near stereoacuity tests.
    Fawcett SL
    J AAPOS; 2005 Dec; 9(6):572-8. PubMed ID: 16414526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Testability of preschoolers on stereotests used to screen vision disorders.
    Schmidt PP; Maguire MG; Moore B; Cyert L;
    Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Nov; 80(11):753-7. PubMed ID: 14627942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Frisby Davis distance stereoacuity values in visually normal children.
    Adams WE; Hrisos S; Richardson S; Davis H; Frisby JP; Clarke MP
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Nov; 89(11):1438-41. PubMed ID: 16234448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual acuity, crowding, and stereo-vision are linked in children with and without amblyopia.
    Greenwood JA; Tailor VK; Sloper JJ; Simmers AJ; Bex PJ; Dakin SC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Nov; 53(12):7655-65. PubMed ID: 23074213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Random Dot Computer Video Game Improves Stereopsis.
    Portela-Camino JA; Martín-González S; Ruiz-Alcocer J; Illarramendi-Mendicute I; Garrido-Mercado R
    Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Jun; 95(6):523-535. PubMed ID: 29787486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The relationship between stereopsis and visual acuity after occlusion therapy for amblyopia.
    Lee SY; Isenberg SJ
    Ophthalmology; 2003 Nov; 110(11):2088-92. PubMed ID: 14597513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correlation between depth perception by three-rods test and stereoacuity by distance Randot Stereotest.
    Matsuo T; Negayama R; Sakata H; Hasebe K
    Strabismus; 2014 Sep; 22(3):133-7. PubMed ID: 25058604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A study on the clinical usefulness of digitalized random-dot stereoacuity test.
    Yang JW; Son MH; Yun IH
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 2004 Dec; 18(2):154-60. PubMed ID: 15635829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical Assessment of Stereoacuity and 3-D Stereoscopic Entertainment.
    Tidbury LP; Black RH; O'Connor AR
    Strabismus; 2015; 23(4):164-9. PubMed ID: 26669421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.