These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2780012)
1. Comparative evaluation of screw configuration on the stability of the sagittal split osteotomy. Ardary WC; Tracy DJ; Brownridge GW2nd ; Urata MM Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Aug; 68(2):125-9. PubMed ID: 2780012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Functional stability of sagittal split ramus osteotomies: effects of positional screw size and placement configuration. Shetty V; Freymiller E; McBrearty D; Caputo AA J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1996 May; 54(5):601-9: discussion 609-10. PubMed ID: 8632245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Finite-element-analysis of different screw-diameters in the sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible. Maurer P; Holweg S; Schubert J J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 1999 Dec; 27(6):365-72. PubMed ID: 10870755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of screw placement patterns on the rigidity of the sagittal split ramus osteotomy: technical note. Kim HC; Essaki S; Kameyama T J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 1995 Feb; 23(1):54-6. PubMed ID: 7699086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Photoelastic analysis of internal screw fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Kim HC; Essaki S; Kameyama T; Yamamoto K J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 1993 Sep; 21(6):266-70. PubMed ID: 8227377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vitro strength analysis of sagittal split osteotomy fixation: noncompression monocortical plates versus bicortical position screws. Anucul B; Waite PD; Lemons JE J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1992 Dec; 50(12):1295-9. PubMed ID: 1447609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stability of osteosynthesis with bicortical screws placed in a triangular shape in mandibular sagittal split 5 mm advancement osteotomy: biomechanical tests. Hadi G; Karine BG; Yves C; Pierre L Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Dec; 48(8):624-8. PubMed ID: 20007004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Finite element analysis of a tandem screw configuration in sagittal split osteotomy using biodegradable osteosynthesis screws. Maurer P; Schubert J; Holweg S Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2001; 16(4):300-4. PubMed ID: 12390008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vitro comparison of parameters affecting the fixation strength of sagittal split osteotomies. Kohn DH; Richmond EM; Dootz ER; Feinberg SE; Pietrzak WS J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1995 Dec; 53(12):1374-83; discussion 1383-5. PubMed ID: 7490646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative evaluation of two osteosynthesis methods on stability following sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Maurer P; Knoll WD; Schubert J J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2003 Oct; 31(5):284-9. PubMed ID: 14563328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro comparison of 1.5 mm vs. 2.0 mm screws for fixation in the sagittal split osteotomy. Scaf de Molon R; de Ávila ÉD; Scartezini GR; Bonini Campos JA; Vaz LG; Real Gabrielli MF; Pereira Filho VA J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2011 Dec; 39(8):574-7. PubMed ID: 21227709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical investigation of tibial tubercle osteotomy fixed with various screw configurations. Chang CW; Chen YN; Li CT; Chung CR; Tseng CC; Chang CH; Peng YT Injury; 2019 Feb; 50(2):263-271. PubMed ID: 30554895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Stability of screw fixation in sagittal-split osteotomy of the mandibular ramus]. Eva M; Hiranuma Y; Sasagawa S; Yamamoto Y; Sumida H Josai Shika Daigaku Kiyo; 1986; 15(1):121-8. PubMed ID: 3460651 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro biomechanical evaluation of the use of conventional and locking miniplate/screw systems for sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Ribeiro-Junior PD; Magro-Filho O; Shastri KA; Papageorge MB J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Apr; 68(4):724-30. PubMed ID: 19962812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of screw size and insertion technique on the stability of the mandibular sagittal split osteotomy. Schwimmer A; Greenberg AM; Kummer F; Kaynar A J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1994 Jan; 52(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 8263642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of the angle of the screw on the stability of the mandibular sagittal split ramus osteotomy: a study in sheep mandibles. Uckan S; Schwimmer A; Kummer F; Greenberg AM Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Aug; 39(4):266-8. PubMed ID: 11437421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vitro comparison of screw versus plate fixation in the sagittal split osteotomy. Foley WL; Beckman TW Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1992; 7(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 1291608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An in vitro comparison of an adjustable bone fixation system. Van Sickels JE; Peterson GP; Holms S; Haug RH J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Nov; 63(11):1620-5. PubMed ID: 16243179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative biomechanical and photoelastic evaluation of different fixation techniques of sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular advancement. Sato FR; Asprino L; Consani S; de Moraes M J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jan; 68(1):160-6. PubMed ID: 20006171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stabilization of the short sagittal split osteotomy: in vitro testing of different plate and screw configurations. Hammer B; Ettlin D; Rahn B; Prein J J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 1995 Oct; 23(5):321-4. PubMed ID: 8530709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]