These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27801355)

  • 21. The influence of cost-per-DALY information in health prioritisation and desirable features for a registry: a survey of health policy experts in Vietnam, India and Bangladesh.
    Teerawattananon Y; Tantivess S; Yamabhai I; Tritasavit N; Walker DG; Cohen JT; Neumann PJ
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2016 Dec; 14(1):86. PubMed ID: 27912780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Value Assessment Frameworks for HTA Agencies: The Organization of Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes.
    Baltussen R; Jansen MPM; Bijlmakers L; Grutters J; Kluytmans A; Reuzel RP; Tummers M; der Wilt GJV
    Value Health; 2017 Feb; 20(2):256-260. PubMed ID: 28237205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Healthcare priority-setting criteria and social values in Iran: an investigation of local evidence.
    Goudarzi Z; Bijlmakers L; Nouhi M; Jahangiri R; Heydari M; Simangolwa W; Hakimzadeh SM; Jara KT
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2023 Jun; 39(1):e37. PubMed ID: 37334802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Introducing an Ethics Framework for health priority-setting in South Africa on the path to universal health coverage.
    Blaauw D; Chambers C; Chirwa T; Duba N; Gwyther L; Hofman K; London L; Masilela T; McKerrow N; Modupe O; Moeng L; Mubaiwa V; Nematswerani N; Ramkissoon Y; Saloojee Y; Tshabalala S; Valabhjee K; Versteeg-Mojanaga M; Barsdorf N; Conco D; DiStefano M; Li R; Chalkidou K; Faden R; Goldstein S; Hofman K; Krubiner CB; Merritt MW; Mosam A; Potgieter S; Tugendhaft A
    S Afr Med J; 2022 Mar; 112(3):240-244. PubMed ID: 35380528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Increasing the Legitimacy of Tough Choices in Healthcare Reimbursement: Approach and Results of a Citizen Forum in The Netherlands.
    Bijlmakers L; Jansen M; Boer B; van Dijk W; Groenewoud S; Zwaap J; Helderman JK; van Exel J; Baltussen R
    Value Health; 2020 Jan; 23(1):32-38. PubMed ID: 31952671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Institutionalisation Is a Vital Element for Fairness of Priority Setting in the Package Design if the Target is Universal Health Coverage Comment on "Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes for Health Benefits Package Design - Part II: A Practical Guide".
    Sajadi HS; Jama M; Majdzadeh R
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2023; 12():7544. PubMed ID: 37579458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Research for universal health coverage: setting priorities for policy and systems research in Uganda.
    Ssengooba F; Ssennyonjo A; Rutebemberwa E; Musila T; Namusoke Kiwanuka S; Kemari E; Nattimba M
    Glob Health Action; 2021 Jan; 14(1):1956752. PubMed ID: 34402420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Criteria Used for Priority-Setting for Public Health Resource Allocation in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review.
    Kaur G; Prinja S; Lakshmi PVM; Downey L; Sharma D; Teerawattananon Y
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2019; 35(6):474-483. PubMed ID: 31307561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. How Are New Vaccines Prioritized in Low-Income Countries? A Case Study of Human Papilloma Virus Vaccine and Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine in Uganda.
    Wallace L; Kapirir L
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2017 Dec; 6(12):707-720. PubMed ID: 29172378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Designing an evidence-informed package of essential health services for Universal Health Coverage: lessons learnt and challenges to implementation in Liberia.
    Alwan A; Jallah W; Baltussen R; Carballo M; Gonyon E; Gudumac I; Haghparast-Bidgoli H; Jacobs G; Abou Jaoude GJ; Kateh FN; Logan G; Skordis J
    BMJ Glob Health; 2024 Jun; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 38925666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Challenges and Opportunities for Deliberative Processes for Healthcare Decision-Making Comment on "Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes for Health Benefit Package Design - Part II: A Practical Guide".
    Bond K
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2023; 12():7458. PubMed ID: 35988028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Criteria for the procedural fairness of health financing decisions: a scoping review.
    Dale E; Peacocke EF; Movik E; Voorhoeve A; Ottersen T; Kurowski C; Evans DB; Norheim OF; Gopinathan U
    Health Policy Plan; 2023 Nov; 38(Supplement_1):i13-i35. PubMed ID: 37963078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Implementing evidence-informed deliberative processes in health technology assessment: a low income country perspective.
    Kapiriri L; Baltussen R; Oortwijn W
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2020; 36(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 31944173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The Value of Explicit, Deliberative, and Context-Specified Ethics Analysis for Health Technology Assessment: Evidence From a Novel Approach Piloted in South Africa.
    Krubiner CB; Tugendhaft A; DiStefano MJ; Barsdorf NW; Merritt MW; Goldstein SJ; Mosam A; Potgieter S; Hofman KJ; Faden RR
    Value Health Reg Issues; 2023 Mar; 34():23-30. PubMed ID: 36455448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Policy Choices for Progressive Realization of Universal Health Coverage Comment on "Ethical Perspective: Five Unacceptable Trade-offs on the Path to Universal Health Coverage".
    Tangcharoensathien V; Patcharanarumol W; Panichkriangkrai W; Sommanustweechai A
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2017 Feb; 6(2):107-110. PubMed ID: 28812786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Governance Functions to Accelerate Progress toward Universal Health Coverage (UHC) in the Asia-Pacific Region.
    Yeoh EK; Johnston C; Chau PYK; Kiang N; Tin P; Tang J
    Health Syst Reform; 2019; 5(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 30924745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Stakeholder views on criteria and processes for priority setting in Norway: a qualitative study.
    Aidem JM
    Health Policy; 2017 Jun; 121(6):683-690. PubMed ID: 28433324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Health technology assessment for sexual reproductive health and rights benefits package design in sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review of evidence-informed deliberative processes.
    Simangolwa WM; Mbonigaba J; Govender K
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(6):e0306042. PubMed ID: 38935794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Strengthening expertise for health technology assessment and priority-setting in Africa.
    Doherty JE; Wilkinson T; Edoka I; Hofman K
    Glob Health Action; 2017; 10(1):1370194. PubMed ID: 29035166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Revision of the Ethiopian Essential Health Service Package: An Explication of the Process and Methods Used.
    Eregata GT; Hailu A; Geletu ZA; Memirie ST; Johansson KA; Stenberg K; Bertram MY; Aman A; Norheim OF
    Health Syst Reform; 2020 Dec; 6(1):e1829313. PubMed ID: 33300838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.