114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27801606)
1. Incidence of wound complications after cesarean delivery: is suture closure better?
Tierney N; LaCoursiere DY; Hebert S; Kelly TF; Lukacz ES
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Aug; 30(16):1992-1996. PubMed ID: 27801606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Wound complications in obese women after cesarean: a comparison of staples versus subcuticular suture.
Zaki MN; Truong M; Pyra M; Kominiarek MA; Irwin T
J Perinatol; 2016 Oct; 36(10):819-22. PubMed ID: 27253895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Incidence of wound complications in cesarean deliveries following closure with absorbable subcuticular staples versus conventional skin closure techniques.
Schrufer-Poland TL; Ruiz MP; Kassar S; Tomassian C; Algren SD; Yeast JD
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Nov; 206():53-56. PubMed ID: 27632411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of staples vs subcuticular suture in class III obese women undergoing cesarean: a randomized controlled trial.
Zaki MN; Wing DA; McNulty JA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Apr; 218(4):451.e1-451.e8. PubMed ID: 29474843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Suture Compared With Staple Closure of Skin Incision for High-Order Cesarean Deliveries.
Fox NS; Melka S; Miller J; Bender S; Silverstein M; Saltzman DH; Rebarber A
Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Mar; 131(3):523-528. PubMed ID: 29420412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cesarean wound closure in body mass index 40 or greater comparing suture to staples: a randomized clinical trial.
Rodel RL; Gray KM; Quiner TE; Bodea Braescu A; Gerkin R; Perlow JH
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2021 Jan; 3(1):100271. PubMed ID: 33451603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of suture materials for subcuticular skin closure at cesarean delivery.
Tuuli MG; Stout MJ; Martin S; Rampersad RM; Cahill AG; Macones GA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 215(4):490.e1-5. PubMed ID: 27179440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does Time of Wound Complication after Cesarean Delivery Differ by Type of Skin Closure?
Cooper SM; Blanchard CT; Szychowski JM; Tita ATN
Am J Perinatol; 2019 Jul; 36(9):981-984. PubMed ID: 30477032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Suture versus staples for skin closure after cesarean: a metaanalysis.
Mackeen AD; Schuster M; Berghella V
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May; 212(5):621.e1-10. PubMed ID: 25530592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Suture compared with staple skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.
Mackeen AD; Khalifeh A; Fleisher J; Vogell A; Han C; Sendecki J; Pettker C; Leiby BE; Baxter JK; Sfakianaki A; Berghella V
Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jun; 123(6):1169-1175. PubMed ID: 24807325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Surgical staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.
Figueroa D; Jauk VC; Szychowski JM; Garner R; Biggio JR; Andrews WW; Hauth J; Tita AT
Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jan; 121(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 23262925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Wound morbidity with staples compared with suture for cesarean skin closure by diabetic status.
Fitzwater JL; Jauk VC; Figueroa D; Biggio JR; Andrews WW; Tita AT
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(2):279-82. PubMed ID: 25567558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patient satisfaction and cosmetic outcome in a randomized study of cesarean skin closure.
Fleisher J; Khalifeh A; Pettker C; Berghella V; Dabbish N; Mackeen AD
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Nov; 32(22):3830-3835. PubMed ID: 29739243
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Suture Compared With Staples for Skin Closure After Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Mackeen AD; Sullivan MV; Schuster M; Berghella V
Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug; 140(2):293-303. PubMed ID: 35852281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Staples versus subcuticular suture for cesarean skin closure in obese women: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Han D; Feng L; Xu L; Li C; Zhang Q
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2022 Oct; 51(8):102420. PubMed ID: 35688324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Risk factors for wound complications in morbidly obese women undergoing primary cesarean delivery.
Thornburg LL; Linder MA; Durie DE; Walker B; Pressman EK; Glantz JC
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2012 Sep; 25(9):1544-8. PubMed ID: 22233403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of evidence-based interventions on wound complications after cesarean delivery.
Temming LA; Raghuraman N; Carter EB; Stout MJ; Rampersad RM; Macones GA; Cahill AG; Tuuli MG
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 217(4):449.e1-449.e9. PubMed ID: 28601567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Tuuli MG; Rampersad RM; Carbone JF; Stamilio D; Macones GA; Odibo AO
Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Mar; 117(3):682-690. PubMed ID: 21343772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Skin and subcutaneous fascia closure at caesarean section to reduce wound complications: the closure randomised trial.
Poprzeczny AJ; Grivell RM; Louise J; Deussen AR; Dodd JM
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Oct; 20(1):606. PubMed ID: 33032560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Risk factors for wound disruption following cesarean delivery.
Subramaniam A; Jauk VC; Figueroa D; Biggio JR; Owen J; Tita AT
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Aug; 27(12):1237-40. PubMed ID: 24090116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
