These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27801838)

  • 1. Recovery from the DNA Replication Checkpoint.
    Chaudhury I; Koepp DM
    Genes (Basel); 2016 Oct; 7(11):. PubMed ID: 27801838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Degradation of Mrc1 promotes recombination-mediated restart of stalled replication forks.
    Chaudhury I; Koepp DM
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2017 Mar; 45(5):2558-2570. PubMed ID: 27956499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Intra-S Checkpoint Responses to DNA Damage.
    Iyer DR; Rhind N
    Genes (Basel); 2017 Feb; 8(2):. PubMed ID: 28218681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interplay of replication checkpoints and repair proteins at stalled replication forks.
    Branzei D; Foiani M
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2007 Jul; 6(7):994-1003. PubMed ID: 17382606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The ATR pathway: fine-tuning the fork.
    Paulsen RD; Cimprich KA
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2007 Jul; 6(7):953-66. PubMed ID: 17531546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. S-phase checkpoint regulations that preserve replication and chromosome integrity upon dNTP depletion.
    Giannattasio M; Branzei D
    Cell Mol Life Sci; 2017 Jul; 74(13):2361-2380. PubMed ID: 28220209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ino80 chromatin remodeling complex promotes recovery of stalled replication forks.
    Shimada K; Oma Y; Schleker T; Kugou K; Ohta K; Harata M; Gasser SM
    Curr Biol; 2008 Apr; 18(8):566-75. PubMed ID: 18406137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Temporal separation of replication and recombination requires the intra-S checkpoint.
    Meister P; Taddei A; Vernis L; Poidevin M; Gasser SM; Baldacci G
    J Cell Biol; 2005 Feb; 168(4):537-44. PubMed ID: 15716375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Replication fork progression during re-replication requires the DNA damage checkpoint and double-strand break repair.
    Alexander JL; Barrasa MI; Orr-Weaver TL
    Curr Biol; 2015 Jun; 25(12):1654-60. PubMed ID: 26051888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Maintenance of fork integrity at damaged DNA and natural pause sites.
    Tourrière H; Pasero P
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2007 Jul; 6(7):900-13. PubMed ID: 17379579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Replication fork dynamics and the DNA damage response.
    Jones RM; Petermann E
    Biochem J; 2012 Apr; 443(1):13-26. PubMed ID: 22417748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. ATR/Mec1: coordinating fork stability and repair.
    Friedel AM; Pike BL; Gasser SM
    Curr Opin Cell Biol; 2009 Apr; 21(2):237-44. PubMed ID: 19230642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Checkpoint-mediated control of replisome-fork association and signalling in response to replication pausing.
    Lucca C; Vanoli F; Cotta-Ramusino C; Pellicioli A; Liberi G; Haber J; Foiani M
    Oncogene; 2004 Feb; 23(6):1206-13. PubMed ID: 14647447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The DNA damage checkpoint response to replication stress: A Game of Forks.
    Jossen R; Bermejo R
    Front Genet; 2013; 4():26. PubMed ID: 23493417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ongoing replication forks delay the nuclear envelope breakdown upon mitotic entry.
    Hashimoto Y; Tanaka H
    J Biol Chem; 2021; 296():100033. PubMed ID: 33148697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mrc1 and Tof1 promote replication fork progression and recovery independently of Rad53.
    Tourrière H; Versini G; Cordón-Preciado V; Alabert C; Pasero P
    Mol Cell; 2005 Sep; 19(5):699-706. PubMed ID: 16137625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The DNA damage response during DNA replication.
    Branzei D; Foiani M
    Curr Opin Cell Biol; 2005 Dec; 17(6):568-75. PubMed ID: 16226452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Replisome stability at defective DNA replication forks is independent of S phase checkpoint kinases.
    De Piccoli G; Katou Y; Itoh T; Nakato R; Shirahige K; Labib K
    Mol Cell; 2012 Mar; 45(5):696-704. PubMed ID: 22325992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interplay between wrn and the checkpoint in s-phase.
    Pichierri P
    Ital J Biochem; 2007 Jun; 56(2):130-40. PubMed ID: 17722654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Implication of RPA32 phosphorylation in S-phase checkpoint signalling at replication forks stalled with aphidicolin in Xenopus egg extracts.
    Recolin B; Maiorano D
    Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2012 Nov; 427(4):785-9. PubMed ID: 23047005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.