194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27802124)
1. Margin Integrity and Secondary Caries of Lined or Non-lined Composite and Glass Hybrid Restorations After Selective Excavation In Vitro.
Schwendicke F; Kniess J; Paris S; Blunck U
Oper Dent; 2017; 42(2):155-164. PubMed ID: 27802124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Marginal integrity and secondary caries of selectively excavated teeth in vitro.
Schwendicke F; Kern M; Blunck U; Dörfer C; Drenck J; Paris S
J Dent; 2014 Oct; 42(10):1261-8. PubMed ID: 25132367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fracture Resistance and Cusp Deflection of Lined or Non-lined Composite and Glass Hybrid Restorations Over Residual Demineralized Dentin.
Sawalt M; Paris S; Blunck U; Schwendicke F
J Adhes Dent; 2017; 19(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 28195270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of using different bonding systems and composites on the margin integrity and the mechanical properties of selectively excavated teeth in vitro.
Schwendicke F; Kern M; Dörfer C; Kleemann-Lüpkes J; Paris S; Blunck U
J Dent; 2015 Mar; 43(3):327-34. PubMed ID: 25556352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Secondary caries formation in vitro around glass ionomer-lined amalgam and composite restorations.
Dionysopoulos P; Kotsanos N; Papadogianis Y
J Oral Rehabil; 1996 Aug; 23(8):511-9. PubMed ID: 8866262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Glass hybrid, but not calcium hydroxide, remineralized artificial residual caries lesions in vitro.
Al-Abdi A; Paris S; Schwendicke F
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Jan; 21(1):389-396. PubMed ID: 27033226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Two-year clinical study on postoperative pulpal complications arising from the absence of a glass-ionomer lining in deep occlusal resin-composite restorations.
Banomyong D; Messer H
J Investig Clin Dent; 2013 Nov; 4(4):265-70. PubMed ID: 23355492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fracture resistance and cuspal deflection of incompletely excavated teeth.
Schwendicke F; Kern M; Meyer-Lueckel H; Boels A; Doerfer C; Paris S
J Dent; 2014 Feb; 42(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 24333956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. SEM and microleakage evaluation of the marginal integrity of two types of class V restorations with or without the use of a light-curable coating material and of polishing.
Magni E; Zhang L; Hickel R; Bossù M; Polimeni A; Ferrari M
J Dent; 2008 Nov; 36(11):885-91. PubMed ID: 18757129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Direct resin composite restorations versus indirect composite inlays: one-year results.
Mendonça JS; Neto RG; Santiago SL; Lauris JR; Navarro MF; de Carvalho RM
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 May; 11(3):025-32. PubMed ID: 20461321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of cavity lining on the restoration of root surface carious lesions: a split-mouth, 5-year randomized controlled clinical trial.
Koc Vural U; Gokalp S; Kiremitci A
Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Feb; 24(2):979-989. PubMed ID: 31273529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial.
Banomyong D; Harnirattisai C; Burrow MF
J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 3-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the performance of posterior composite restorations lined with ion-releasing materials.
Ahmed B; Wafaie RA; Hamama HH; Mahmoud SH
Sci Rep; 2024 Feb; 14(1):4942. PubMed ID: 38418863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Human pulp response to conventional and resin-modified glass ionomer cements applied in very deep cavities.
Ribeiro APD; Sacono NT; Soares DG; Bordini EAF; de Souza Costa CA; Hebling J
Clin Oral Investig; 2020 May; 24(5):1739-1748. PubMed ID: 31372829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bioactive glass fillers reduce bacterial penetration into marginal gaps for composite restorations.
Khvostenko D; Hilton TJ; Ferracane JL; Mitchell JC; Kruzic JJ
Dent Mater; 2016 Jan; 32(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 26621028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Restoration integrity, but not material or cementation strategy determined secondary caries lesions next to indirect restorations in vitro.
Lehmensiek M; Askar H; Brouwer F; Blunck U; Paris S; Schwendicke F
Dent Mater; 2018 Dec; 34(12):e317-e323. PubMed ID: 30269863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 6-year results.
Busato AL; Loguercio AD; Reis A; Carrilho MR
Am J Dent; 2001 Oct; 14(5):304-8. PubMed ID: 11803995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. No additional benefit of using a calcium hydroxide liner during stepwise caries removal: A randomized clinical trial.
Pereira MA; Santos-Júnior RBD; Tavares JA; Oliveira AH; Leal PC; Takeshita WM; Barbosa-Júnior AM; Bertassoni LEB; Faria-E-Silva AL
J Am Dent Assoc; 2017 Jun; 148(6):369-376. PubMed ID: 28343596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
