178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27802289)
1. Has Metal-On-Metal Resurfacing Been a Cost-Effective Intervention for Health Care Providers?-A Registry Based Study.
Pulikottil-Jacob R; Connock M; Kandala NB; Mistry H; Grove A; Freeman K; Costa M; Sutcliffe P; Clarke A
PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0165021. PubMed ID: 27802289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Total hip replacement and surface replacement for the treatment of pain and disability resulting from end-stage arthritis of the hip (review of technology appraisal guidance 2 and 44): systematic review and economic evaluation.
Clarke A; Pulikottil-Jacob R; Grove A; Freeman K; Mistry H; Tsertsvadze A; Connock M; Court R; Kandala NB; Costa M; Suri G; Metcalfe D; Crowther M; Morrow S; Johnson S; Sutcliffe P
Health Technol Assess; 2015 Jan; 19(10):1-668, vii-viii. PubMed ID: 25634033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Failure rates of metal-on-metal hip resurfacings: analysis of data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.
Smith AJ; Dieppe P; Howard PW; Blom AW;
Lancet; 2012 Nov; 380(9855):1759-66. PubMed ID: 23036895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Implications of Introducing New Technology: Comparative Survivorship Modeling of Metal-on-Metal Hip Replacements and Contemporary Alternatives in the National Joint Registry.
Hunt LP; Whitehouse MR; Beswick A; Porter ML; Howard P; Blom AW
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2018 Feb; 100(3):189-196. PubMed ID: 29406339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-utility of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compared to conventional total hip replacement in young active patients with osteoarthritis.
Heintzbergen S; Kulin NA; Ijzerman MJ; Steuten LM; Werle J; Khong H; Marshall DA
Value Health; 2013; 16(6):942-52. PubMed ID: 24041344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Independent predictors of revision following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: a retrospective cohort study using National Joint Registry data.
Jameson SS; Baker PN; Mason J; Porter ML; Deehan DJ; Reed MR
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Jun; 94(6):746-54. PubMed ID: 22628587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Choice of Prosthetic Implant Combinations in Total Hip Replacement: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Using UK and Swedish Hip Joint Registries Data.
Fawsitt CG; Thom HHZ; Hunt LP; Nemes S; Blom AW; Welton NJ; Hollingworth W; López-López JA; Beswick AD; Burston A; Rolfson O; Garellick G; Marques EMR
Value Health; 2019 Mar; 22(3):303-312. PubMed ID: 30832968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty in osteoarthritis: comparison of devices with differing bearing surfaces and modes of fixation.
Pulikottil-Jacob R; Connock M; Kandala NB; Mistry H; Grove A; Freeman K; Costa M; Sutcliffe P; Clarke A
Bone Joint J; 2015 Apr; 97-B(4):449-57. PubMed ID: 25820881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Implant Optimisation for Primary Hip Replacement in Patients over 60 Years with Osteoarthritis: A Cohort Study of Clinical Outcomes and Implant Costs Using Data from England and Wales.
Jameson SS; Mason J; Baker PN; Gregg PJ; Deehan DJ; Reed MR
PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0140309. PubMed ID: 26561859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of primary metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties on the National Joint Registry for England, Wales and Northern Ireland using data from the London Implant Retrieval Centre: a study using the NJR dataset.
Sabah SA; Henckel J; Cook E; Whittaker R; Hothi H; Pappas Y; Blunn G; Skinner JA; Hart AJ
Bone Joint J; 2015 Jan; 97-B(1):10-8. PubMed ID: 25568407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outcomes After Metal-on-metal Hip Revision Surgery Depend on the Reason for Failure: A Propensity Score-matched Study.
Matharu GS; Judge A; Murray DW; Pandit HG
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):245-258. PubMed ID: 29529653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Five-year results of the ASR XL Acetabular System and the ASR Hip Resurfacing System: an analysis from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
de Steiger RN; Hang JR; Miller LN; Graves SE; Davidson DC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Dec; 93(24):2287-93. PubMed ID: 22258775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Do the potential benefits of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing justify the increased cost and risk of complications?
Bozic KJ; Pui CM; Ludeman MJ; Vail TP; Silverstein MD
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Sep; 468(9):2301-12. PubMed ID: 20232182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness and economic modelling of minimal incision total hip replacement approaches in the management of arthritic disease of the hip.
de Verteuil R; Imamura M; Zhu S; Glazener C; Fraser C; Munro N; Hutchison J; Grant A; Coyle D; Coyle K; Vale L
Health Technol Assess; 2008 Jun; 12(26):iii-iv, ix-223. PubMed ID: 18513467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hip resurfacing versus total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review comparing standardized outcomes.
Marshall DA; Pykerman K; Werle J; Lorenzetti D; Wasylak T; Noseworthy T; Dick DA; O'Connor G; Sundaram A; Heintzbergen S; Frank C
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Jul; 472(7):2217-30. PubMed ID: 24700446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lifetime cost effectiveness of different brands of prosthesis used for total hip arthroplasty: a study using the NJR dataset.
Pennington MW; Grieve R; van der Meulen JH
Bone Joint J; 2015 Jun; 97-B(6):762-70. PubMed ID: 26033055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty versus large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: comparison of three designs from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.
Junnila M; Kostensalo I; Virolainen P; Remes V; Matilainen M; Vahlberg T; Pulkkinen P; Eskelinen A; Itälä A; Mäkelä K
Scand J Surg; 2014 Mar; 103(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 24345980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Which factors influence the rate of failure following metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty revision surgery performed for adverse reactions to metal debris? an analysis from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.
Matharu GS; Judge A; Pandit HG; Murray DW
Bone Joint J; 2017 Aug; 99-B(8):1020-1027. PubMed ID: 28768778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Failure rates of stemmed metal-on-metal hip replacements: analysis of data from the National Joint Registry of England and Wales.
Smith AJ; Dieppe P; Vernon K; Porter M; Blom AW;
Lancet; 2012 Mar; 379(9822):1199-204. PubMed ID: 22417410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is the rate of revision of 36 mm metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties with Pinnacle acetabular components related to the year of the initial operation? an interrupted time-series analysis using data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.
Matharu GS; Hunt LP; Murray DW; Howard P; Pandit HG; Blom AW; Bolland B; Judge A
Bone Joint J; 2018 Jan; 100-B(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 29305448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
