These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27803288)

  • 41. Perceptual properties of feedback stimuli influence the feedback-related negativity in the flanker gambling task.
    Liu Y; Nelson LD; Bernat EM; Gehring WJ
    Psychophysiology; 2014 Aug; 51(8):782-8. PubMed ID: 24673119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Goal impact influences the evaluative component of performance monitoring: Evidence from ERPs.
    Severo MC; Walentowska W; Moors A; Pourtois G
    Biol Psychol; 2017 Oct; 129():90-102. PubMed ID: 28844662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Feedback-related negativity is enhanced in adolescence during a gambling task with and without probabilistic reinforcement learning.
    Martínez-Velázquez ES; Ramos-Loyo J; González-Garrido AA; Sequeira H
    Neuroreport; 2015 Jan; 26(2):45-9. PubMed ID: 25494471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Representing the consequences of our actions trial by trial: Complex and flexible encoding of feedback valence and magnitude.
    Padrón I; Fernández-Rey J; Acuña C; Pardo-Vazquez JL
    Neuroscience; 2016 Oct; 333():264-76. PubMed ID: 27457038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. ERP markers of action planning and outcome monitoring in human - robot interaction.
    Hinz NA; Ciardo F; Wykowska A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 Jan; 212():103216. PubMed ID: 33285360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Self-relevant criteria determine the evaluation of outcomes induced by others.
    Itagaki S; Katayama J
    Neuroreport; 2008 Feb; 19(3):383-7. PubMed ID: 18303586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Positive bias in self-appraisals from friend's perspective: an event-related potential study.
    Li S; Xu K; Xu Q; Xia R; Ren D; Zhou A
    Neuroreport; 2016 Jun; 27(9):694-8. PubMed ID: 27138953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The feedback-related negativity reflects the binary evaluation of good versus bad outcomes.
    Hajcak G; Moser JS; Holroyd CB; Simons RF
    Biol Psychol; 2006 Feb; 71(2):148-54. PubMed ID: 16005561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Sense of agency in the human brain.
    Haggard P
    Nat Rev Neurosci; 2017 Apr; 18(4):196-207. PubMed ID: 28251993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Self-reflection modulates the outcome evaluation process: Evidence from an ERP study.
    Zhu X; Gu R; Wu H; Luo Y
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Dec; 98(3 Pt 1):389-93. PubMed ID: 26255975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Brain potentials associated with outcome expectation and outcome evaluation.
    Yu R; Zhou X
    Neuroreport; 2006 Oct; 17(15):1649-53. PubMed ID: 17001286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Changes of Causal Attribution by a Co-actor in Situations of Obvious Causality.
    Hayashida K; Miyawaki Y; Nishi Y; Morioka S
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():588089. PubMed ID: 33488455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Perspective taking modulates positivity bias in self-appraisals: behavioral and event-related potential evidence.
    Zhou A; Li S; Herbert C; Xia R; Xu K; Xu Q; Zhu J; Ren D
    Soc Neurosci; 2013; 8(4):326-33. PubMed ID: 23802122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. How does cognitive reappraisal affect the response to gains and losses?
    Yang Q; Gu R; Tang P; Luo YJ
    Psychophysiology; 2013 Nov; 50(11):1094-103. PubMed ID: 23889144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. System justification and electrophysiological responses to feedback: support for a positivity bias.
    Tritt SM; Page-Gould E; Peterson JB; Inzlicht M
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Jun; 143(3):1004-10. PubMed ID: 24274321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The Sense of Agency Is More Sensitive to Manipulations of Outcome than Movement-Related Feedback Irrespective of Sensory Modality.
    David N; Skoruppa S; Gulberti A; Schultz J; Engel AK
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0161156. PubMed ID: 27536948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Whodunnit? Electrophysiological correlates of agency judgements.
    Kühn S; Nenchev I; Haggard P; Brass M; Gallinat J; Voss M
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(12):e28657. PubMed ID: 22194878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. When your errors make me lose or win: event-related potentials to observed errors of cooperators and competitors.
    Koban L; Pourtois G; Vocat R; Vuilleumier P
    Soc Neurosci; 2010; 5(4):360-74. PubMed ID: 20349391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Performance monitoring among non-patients with obsessive-compulsive symptoms: ERP evidence of aberrant feedback monitoring.
    O'Toole SA; Weinborn M; Fox AM
    Biol Psychol; 2012 Oct; 91(2):221-8. PubMed ID: 22749966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Neural correlates of feedback processing in toddlers.
    Meyer M; Bekkering H; Janssen DJ; de Bruijn ER; Hunnius S
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Jul; 26(7):1519-27. PubMed ID: 24392905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.