BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27803595)

  • 1. Reoperation costs in attempted breast-conserving surgery: a decision analysis.
    Pataky RE; Baliski CR
    Curr Oncol; 2016 Oct; 23(5):314-321. PubMed ID: 27803595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of the SSO/ASTRO Margin Reexcision Guidelines on Costs Associated with Breast-Conserving Surgery.
    Baliski CR; Pataky RE
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Mar; 24(3):632-637. PubMed ID: 27882469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Correlates of patient satisfaction and provider trust after breast-conserving surgery.
    Waljee JF; Hu ES; Newman LA; Alderman AK
    Cancer; 2008 Apr; 112(8):1679-87. PubMed ID: 18327801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of additional tumor cavity sampling at the time of breast-conserving surgery on final margin status, volume of resection, and pathologist workload.
    Rizzo M; Iyengar R; Gabram SG; Park J; Birdsong G; Chandler KL; Mosunjac MB
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2010 Jan; 17(1):228-34. PubMed ID: 19636625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery Reduces Mastectomy and Postoperative Re-excision Rates.
    Crown A; Wechter DG; Grumley JW
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Oct; 22(10):3363-8. PubMed ID: 26208579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Economic Implications of Widespread Expansion of Frozen Section Margin Analysis to Guide Surgical Resection in Women With Breast Cancer Undergoing Breast-Conserving Surgery.
    Boughey JC; Keeney GL; Radensky P; Song CP; Habermann EB
    J Oncol Pract; 2016 Apr; 12(4):e413-22. PubMed ID: 26907452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost minimization in breast conserving surgery: a comparative study of radiofrequency spectroscopy and full cavity shave margins.
    Gilmore R; Chen J; Dembinski R; Reissis Y; Milek D; Cadena L; Habibi M
    Cost Eff Resour Alloc; 2023 Sep; 21(1):66. PubMed ID: 37716980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predictors of re-excision among women undergoing breast-conserving surgery for cancer.
    Waljee JF; Hu ES; Newman LA; Alderman AK
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 May; 15(5):1297-303. PubMed ID: 18259820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Survival Comparisons for Breast Conserving Surgery and Mastectomy Revisited: Community Experience and the Role of Radiation Therapy.
    Onitilo AA; Engel JM; Stankowski RV; Doi SA
    Clin Med Res; 2015 Jun; 13(2):65-73. PubMed ID: 25487237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Should breast density influence patient selection for breast-conserving surgery?
    Kapoor NS; Eaton A; King TA; Patil S; Stempel M; Morris E; Brogi E; Morrow M
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Feb; 20(2):600-6. PubMed ID: 22941162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hospital and surgeon caseload are associated with risk of re-operation following breast-conserving surgery.
    de Camargo Cancela M; Comber H; Sharp L
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2013 Aug; 140(3):535-44. PubMed ID: 23893128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Costs of treatment for elderly women with early-stage breast cancer in fee-for-service settings.
    Warren JL; Brown ML; Fay MP; Schussler N; Potosky AL; Riley GF
    J Clin Oncol; 2002 Jan; 20(1):307-16. PubMed ID: 11773184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Overall survival in patients with a re-excision following breast conserving surgery compared to those without in a large population-based cohort.
    Vos EL; Jager A; Verhoef C; Voogd AC; Koppert LB
    Eur J Cancer; 2015 Feb; 51(3):282-91. PubMed ID: 25549530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Total Mastectomy or Breast Conservation Therapy? How Radiation Oncologist Accessibility Determines Treatment Choice and Quality: A SEER Data-base Analysis.
    Churilla TM; Donnelly PE; Leatherman ER; Adonizio CS; Peters CA
    Breast J; 2015; 21(5):473-80. PubMed ID: 26133235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Repeat surgery following breast conservation and intra-operative sentinel lymph node analysis for breast cancer.
    Dabbas N; Cutress RI; Wise M; Yiangou C; Agrawal A
    Surgeon; 2013 Oct; 11(5):235-40. PubMed ID: 23453370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intraoperative Assessment of Final Margins with a Handheld Optical Imaging Probe During Breast-Conserving Surgery May Reduce the Reoperation Rate: Results of a Multicenter Study.
    Zysk AM; Chen K; Gabrielson E; Tafra L; May Gonzalez EA; Canner JK; Schneider EB; Cittadine AJ; Scott Carney P; Boppart SA; Tsuchiya K; Sawyer K; Jacobs LK
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Oct; 22(10):3356-62. PubMed ID: 26202553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Patterns of initial management of node-negative breast cancer in two Canadian provinces. British Columbia/Ontario Working Group.
    Goel V; Olivotto I; Hislop TG; Sawka C; Coldman A; Holowaty EJ
    CMAJ; 1997 Jan; 156(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 9006561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determinants for patient satisfaction regarding aesthetic outcome and skin sensitivity after breast-conserving surgery.
    Dahlbäck C; Manjer J; Rehn M; Ringberg A
    World J Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 14(1):303. PubMed ID: 27923403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Low re-excision rate for positive margins in patients treated with ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery.
    Yu CC; Chiang KC; Kuo WL; Shen SC; Lo YF; Chen SC
    Breast; 2013 Oct; 22(5):698-702. PubMed ID: 23333255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Influence of Repeat Surgery and Residual Disease on Recurrence After Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group Study.
    Bodilsen A; Bjerre K; Offersen BV; Vahl P; Ejlertsen B; Overgaard J; Christiansen P
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Dec; 22 Suppl 3():S476-85. PubMed ID: 26178760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.