225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27803954)
1. Clinical outcomes of femoral closure compared to radial compression devices following percutaneous coronary intervention: the FERARI study.
Fastner C; Behnes M; Ünsal M; El-Battrawy I; Ansari U; Mashayekhi K; Hoffmann U; Lang S; Kuschyk J; Borggrefe M; Akin I
Heart Vessels; 2017 May; 32(5):520-530. PubMed ID: 27803954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Differences of bleedings after percutaneous coronary intervention using femoral closure and radial compression devices.
Kim SH; Behnes M; Baron S; Shchetynska-Marinova T; Tekinsoy M; Mashayekhi K; Hoffmann U; Borggrefe M; Akin I
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 May; 98(20):e15501. PubMed ID: 31096450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Extravascular compared to Intravascular Femoral Closure is Associated with Less Bleeding and Similar MACE after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
Kim SH; Behnes M; Baron S; Shchetynska-Marinova T; Uensal M; Mashayekhi K; Hoffmann U; Borggrefe M; Akin I
Int J Med Sci; 2019; 16(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 30662327
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of a vascular closure device versus the radial approach to reduce access site complications in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients: The angio-seal versus the radial approach in acute coronary syndrome trial.
Andrade PB; Mattos LA; Rinaldi FS; Bienert IC; Barbosa RA; Labrunie A; Tebet M; Esteves V; Abizaid A; Sousa AR
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 May; 89(6):976-982. PubMed ID: 27514319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Design and Rationale of the Femoral Closure versus Radial Compression Devices Related to Percutaneous Coronary Interventions (FERARI) Study.
Behnes M; Ünsal M; Hoffmann U; Fastner C; El-Battrawy I; Lang S; Mashayekhi K; Lehmann R; Borggrefe M; Akin I
Clin Med Insights Cardiol; 2015; 9():97-103. PubMed ID: 26568686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Arterial access-site complications after use of a vascular closure device related to puncture height.
Sartorius B; Behnes M; Ünsal M; Hoffmann U; Lang S; Mashayekhi K; Borggrefe M; Akin I
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2017 Feb; 17(1):64. PubMed ID: 28209184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A prospective randomised comparison of minor bleedings in transradial vs. transfemoral access percutaneous coronary interventions for STEMI: a new FEMORAL bleeding classification.
Kołtowski L; Filipiak KJ; Tomaniak M; Kochman J; Pietrasik A; Rdzanek A; Huczek Z; Scibisz A; Mazurek T; Opolski G
Kardiol Pol; 2014; 72(9):790-7. PubMed ID: 24846364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radiation exposure and contrast agent use related to radial versus femoral arterial access during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-Results of the FERARI study.
Becher T; Behnes M; Ünsal M; Baumann S; El-Battrawy I; Fastner C; Kuschyk J; Papavassiliu T; Hoffmann U; Mashayekhi K; Borggrefe M; Akin I
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2016 Dec; 17(8):505-509. PubMed ID: 27350417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Safety of coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention via the radial versus femoral route in patients on uninterrupted oral anticoagulation with warfarin.
Baker NC; O'Connell EW; Htun WW; Sun H; Green SM; Skelding KA; Blankenship JC; Scott TD; Berger PB
Am Heart J; 2014 Oct; 168(4):537-44. PubMed ID: 25262264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of radial access versus femoral access with the use of a vascular closure device for the prevention of vascular complications and mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention.
Téblick A; Vanderbruggen W; Vandendriessche T; Bosmans J; Haine SEF; Miljoen H; Segers V; Wouters K; Vrints C; Claeys MJ
Acta Cardiol; 2018 Jun; 73(3):241-247. PubMed ID: 28851255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of hemostatic device on radial artery occlusion: A randomized comparison of compression devices in the radial hemostasis study.
Sanghvi KA; Montgomery M; Varghese V
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2018 Dec; 19(8):934-938. PubMed ID: 30243962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radial versus femoral access for primary percutaneous interventions in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Karrowni W; Vyas A; Giacomino B; Schweizer M; Blevins A; Girotra S; Horwitz PA
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Aug; 6(8):814-23. PubMed ID: 23968700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transfemoral approach with systematic use of FemoSeal™ closure device compared to transradial approach in primary angioplasty.
Alonzo A; Rigattieri S; Giovannelli F; Di Russo C; Sciahbasi A; Berni A; Volpe M
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Apr; 87(5):849-54. PubMed ID: 26104978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Design and rationale of the AngioSeal versus the Radial approach In acute coronary SyndromE (ARISE) trial: a randomized comparison of a vascular closure device versus the radial approach to prevent vascular access site complications in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients.
de Andrade PB; E Mattos LA; Tebet MA; Rinaldi FS; Esteves VC; Nogueira EF; França JÍ; de Andrade MV; Barbosa RA; Labrunie A; Abizaid AA; Sousa AG
Trials; 2013 Dec; 14():435. PubMed ID: 24345099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A registry-based randomized trial comparing radial and femoral approaches in women undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the SAFE-PCI for Women (Study of Access Site for Enhancement of PCI for Women) trial.
Rao SV; Hess CN; Barham B; Aberle LH; Anstrom KJ; Patel TB; Jorgensen JP; Mazzaferri EL; Jolly SS; Jacobs A; Newby LK; Gibson CM; Kong DF; Mehran R; Waksman R; Gilchrist IC; McCourt BJ; Messenger JC; Peterson ED; Harrington RA; Krucoff MW
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Aug; 7(8):857-67. PubMed ID: 25147030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of collagen-based vascular closure devices in patients with vs. without severe peripheral artery disease.
Kara K; Kahlert P; Mahabadi AA; Plicht B; Lind AY; Longwitz D; Bollow M; Erbel R
J Endovasc Ther; 2014 Feb; 21(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 24502487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Access for percutaneous coronary intervention in ST segment elevation myocardial infarction: radial vs. femoral--a prospective, randomised clinical trial (OCEAN RACE).
Kołtowski L; Filipiak KJ; Kochman J; Pietrasik A; Rdzanek A; Huczek Z; Scibisz A; Mazurek T; Opolski G
Kardiol Pol; 2014; 72(7):604-11. PubMed ID: 24671918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effectiveness of Arterial Closure Devices for Preventing Complications With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Instrumental Variable Analysis.
Wimmer NJ; Secemsky EA; Mauri L; Roe MT; Saha-Chaudhuri P; Dai D; McCabe JM; Resnic FS; Gurm HS; Yeh RW
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Apr; 9(4):e003464. PubMed ID: 27059685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rationale and design of a randomised clinical trial comparing vascular closure device and manual compression to achieve haemostasis after diagnostic coronary angiography: the Instrumental Sealing of ARterial puncture site - CLOSURE device versus manual compression (ISAR-CLOSURE) trial.
Xhepa E; Byrne RA; Schulz S; Helde S; Gewalt S; Cassese S; Linhardt M; Ibrahim T; Mehilli J; Hoppe K; Grupp K; Kufner S; Böttiger C; Hoppmann P; Burgdorf C; Fusaro M; Ott I; Schneider S; Hengstenberg C; Schunkert H; Laugwitz KL; Kastrati A;
EuroIntervention; 2014 Jun; 10(2):198-203. PubMed ID: 24952057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use and outcome of radial versus femoral approach for primary PCI in patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction without cardiogenic shock: results from the ALKK PCI registry.
Bauer T; Hochadel M; Brachmann J; Schächinger V; Boekstegers P; Zrenner B; Zahn R; Zeymer U;
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Oct; 86 Suppl 1():S8-14. PubMed ID: 25945803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
