These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27803954)

  • 1. Clinical outcomes of femoral closure compared to radial compression devices following percutaneous coronary intervention: the FERARI study.
    Fastner C; Behnes M; Ünsal M; El-Battrawy I; Ansari U; Mashayekhi K; Hoffmann U; Lang S; Kuschyk J; Borggrefe M; Akin I
    Heart Vessels; 2017 May; 32(5):520-530. PubMed ID: 27803954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Differences of bleedings after percutaneous coronary intervention using femoral closure and radial compression devices.
    Kim SH; Behnes M; Baron S; Shchetynska-Marinova T; Tekinsoy M; Mashayekhi K; Hoffmann U; Borggrefe M; Akin I
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 May; 98(20):e15501. PubMed ID: 31096450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Extravascular compared to Intravascular Femoral Closure is Associated with Less Bleeding and Similar MACE after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Kim SH; Behnes M; Baron S; Shchetynska-Marinova T; Uensal M; Mashayekhi K; Hoffmann U; Borggrefe M; Akin I
    Int J Med Sci; 2019; 16(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 30662327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of a vascular closure device versus the radial approach to reduce access site complications in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients: The angio-seal versus the radial approach in acute coronary syndrome trial.
    Andrade PB; Mattos LA; Rinaldi FS; Bienert IC; Barbosa RA; Labrunie A; Tebet M; Esteves V; Abizaid A; Sousa AR
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 May; 89(6):976-982. PubMed ID: 27514319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Design and Rationale of the Femoral Closure versus Radial Compression Devices Related to Percutaneous Coronary Interventions (FERARI) Study.
    Behnes M; Ünsal M; Hoffmann U; Fastner C; El-Battrawy I; Lang S; Mashayekhi K; Lehmann R; Borggrefe M; Akin I
    Clin Med Insights Cardiol; 2015; 9():97-103. PubMed ID: 26568686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Arterial access-site complications after use of a vascular closure device related to puncture height.
    Sartorius B; Behnes M; Ünsal M; Hoffmann U; Lang S; Mashayekhi K; Borggrefe M; Akin I
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2017 Feb; 17(1):64. PubMed ID: 28209184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A prospective randomised comparison of minor bleedings in transradial vs. transfemoral access percutaneous coronary interventions for STEMI: a new FEMORAL bleeding classification.
    Kołtowski L; Filipiak KJ; Tomaniak M; Kochman J; Pietrasik A; Rdzanek A; Huczek Z; Scibisz A; Mazurek T; Opolski G
    Kardiol Pol; 2014; 72(9):790-7. PubMed ID: 24846364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiation exposure and contrast agent use related to radial versus femoral arterial access during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-Results of the FERARI study.
    Becher T; Behnes M; Ünsal M; Baumann S; El-Battrawy I; Fastner C; Kuschyk J; Papavassiliu T; Hoffmann U; Mashayekhi K; Borggrefe M; Akin I
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2016 Dec; 17(8):505-509. PubMed ID: 27350417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Safety of coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention via the radial versus femoral route in patients on uninterrupted oral anticoagulation with warfarin.
    Baker NC; O'Connell EW; Htun WW; Sun H; Green SM; Skelding KA; Blankenship JC; Scott TD; Berger PB
    Am Heart J; 2014 Oct; 168(4):537-44. PubMed ID: 25262264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of radial access versus femoral access with the use of a vascular closure device for the prevention of vascular complications and mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Téblick A; Vanderbruggen W; Vandendriessche T; Bosmans J; Haine SEF; Miljoen H; Segers V; Wouters K; Vrints C; Claeys MJ
    Acta Cardiol; 2018 Jun; 73(3):241-247. PubMed ID: 28851255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of hemostatic device on radial artery occlusion: A randomized comparison of compression devices in the radial hemostasis study.
    Sanghvi KA; Montgomery M; Varghese V
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2018 Dec; 19(8):934-938. PubMed ID: 30243962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radial versus femoral access for primary percutaneous interventions in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Karrowni W; Vyas A; Giacomino B; Schweizer M; Blevins A; Girotra S; Horwitz PA
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Aug; 6(8):814-23. PubMed ID: 23968700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transfemoral approach with systematic use of FemoSeal™ closure device compared to transradial approach in primary angioplasty.
    Alonzo A; Rigattieri S; Giovannelli F; Di Russo C; Sciahbasi A; Berni A; Volpe M
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Apr; 87(5):849-54. PubMed ID: 26104978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Design and rationale of the AngioSeal versus the Radial approach In acute coronary SyndromE (ARISE) trial: a randomized comparison of a vascular closure device versus the radial approach to prevent vascular access site complications in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients.
    de Andrade PB; E Mattos LA; Tebet MA; Rinaldi FS; Esteves VC; Nogueira EF; França JÍ; de Andrade MV; Barbosa RA; Labrunie A; Abizaid AA; Sousa AG
    Trials; 2013 Dec; 14():435. PubMed ID: 24345099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A registry-based randomized trial comparing radial and femoral approaches in women undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the SAFE-PCI for Women (Study of Access Site for Enhancement of PCI for Women) trial.
    Rao SV; Hess CN; Barham B; Aberle LH; Anstrom KJ; Patel TB; Jorgensen JP; Mazzaferri EL; Jolly SS; Jacobs A; Newby LK; Gibson CM; Kong DF; Mehran R; Waksman R; Gilchrist IC; McCourt BJ; Messenger JC; Peterson ED; Harrington RA; Krucoff MW
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Aug; 7(8):857-67. PubMed ID: 25147030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of collagen-based vascular closure devices in patients with vs. without severe peripheral artery disease.
    Kara K; Kahlert P; Mahabadi AA; Plicht B; Lind AY; Longwitz D; Bollow M; Erbel R
    J Endovasc Ther; 2014 Feb; 21(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 24502487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Access for percutaneous coronary intervention in ST segment elevation myocardial infarction: radial vs. femoral--a prospective, randomised clinical trial (OCEAN RACE).
    Kołtowski L; Filipiak KJ; Kochman J; Pietrasik A; Rdzanek A; Huczek Z; Scibisz A; Mazurek T; Opolski G
    Kardiol Pol; 2014; 72(7):604-11. PubMed ID: 24671918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effectiveness of Arterial Closure Devices for Preventing Complications With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Instrumental Variable Analysis.
    Wimmer NJ; Secemsky EA; Mauri L; Roe MT; Saha-Chaudhuri P; Dai D; McCabe JM; Resnic FS; Gurm HS; Yeh RW
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Apr; 9(4):e003464. PubMed ID: 27059685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rationale and design of a randomised clinical trial comparing vascular closure device and manual compression to achieve haemostasis after diagnostic coronary angiography: the Instrumental Sealing of ARterial puncture site - CLOSURE device versus manual compression (ISAR-CLOSURE) trial.
    Xhepa E; Byrne RA; Schulz S; Helde S; Gewalt S; Cassese S; Linhardt M; Ibrahim T; Mehilli J; Hoppe K; Grupp K; Kufner S; Böttiger C; Hoppmann P; Burgdorf C; Fusaro M; Ott I; Schneider S; Hengstenberg C; Schunkert H; Laugwitz KL; Kastrati A;
    EuroIntervention; 2014 Jun; 10(2):198-203. PubMed ID: 24952057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use and outcome of radial versus femoral approach for primary PCI in patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction without cardiogenic shock: results from the ALKK PCI registry.
    Bauer T; Hochadel M; Brachmann J; Schächinger V; Boekstegers P; Zrenner B; Zahn R; Zeymer U;
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Oct; 86 Suppl 1():S8-14. PubMed ID: 25945803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.