231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27803985)
1. Marginal integrity of low-shrinking versus methacrylate-based composite: effect of different one-step self-etch adhesives.
Gregor L; Dorien L; Bortolotto T; Feilzer AJ; Krejci I
Odontology; 2017 Jul; 105(3):291-299. PubMed ID: 27803985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Shrinkage kinetics of a methacrylate- and a silorane-based resin composite: effect on marginal integrity.
Gregor L; Bortolotto T; Feilzer AJ; Krejci I
J Adhes Dent; 2013 Jun; 15(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 23534010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the influence of three different temperatures on microleakage of two self-etch and one total-etch adhesives.
Akbarian S; Sharafeddin F; Akbarian G
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 Mar; 16(3):178-82. PubMed ID: 26057914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Microleakage of silorane- and methacrylate-based class V composite restorations.
Krifka S; Federlin M; Hiller KA; Schmalz G
Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Aug; 16(4):1117-24. PubMed ID: 21947906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Five-year clinical performance of a silorane- vs a methacrylate-based composite combined with two different adhesive approaches.
Baracco B; Fuentes MV; Ceballos L
Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Jun; 20(5):991-1001. PubMed ID: 26388406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bonding of low-shrinking composites in high C-factor cavities.
Van Ende A; Mine A; De Munck J; Poitevin A; Van Meerbeek B
J Dent; 2012 Apr; 40(4):295-303. PubMed ID: 22273743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative evaluation of marginal adaptation and microleakage of low-shrinking composites after thermocycling and mechanical loading.
Hepdeniz OK; Ermis RB
Niger J Clin Pract; 2019 May; 22(5):633-641. PubMed ID: 31089017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does a low-shrinking composite induce less stress at the adhesive interface?
Van Ende A; De Munck J; Mine A; Lambrechts P; Van Meerbeek B
Dent Mater; 2010 Mar; 26(3):215-22. PubMed ID: 19906417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Selective enamel etching: effect on marginal adaptation of self-etch LED-cured bond systems in aged Class I composite restorations.
Souza-Junior EJ; Prieto LT; Araújo CT; Paulillo LA
Oper Dent; 2012; 37(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 22313271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Marginal adaptation of ormocer-, silorane-, and methacrylate-based composite restorative systems bonded to dentin cavities after water storage.
Mahmoud SH; Al-Wakeel Eel S
Quintessence Int; 2011; 42(10):e131-9. PubMed ID: 22026005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Microtensile bond strength of a new silorane-based composite resin adhesive.
Giacobbi MF; Vandewalle KS
Gen Dent; 2012; 60(3):e148-52. PubMed ID: 22623470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of different bonding strategies on the marginal adaptation of class 1 silorane restorations.
Gregor L; Bortolotto T; Feilzer AJ; Krejci I
Am J Dent; 2013 Jun; 26(3):127-31. PubMed ID: 23986958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives.
Khoroushi M; Karvandi TM; Kamali B; Mazaheri H
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 23059577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Marginal and internal adaptation of bulk-filled Class I and Cuspal coverage direct resin composite restorations.
Stavridakis MM; Kakaboura AI; Ardu S; Krejci I
Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 17910230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of silorane and methacrylate-based composites on the polymerization heat generated with different light-curing units and dentin thicknesses.
Guiraldo RD; Consani S; Consani RL; Berger SB; Correr AB; Sinhoreti MA; Correr-Sobrinho L
Braz Dent J; 2013; 24(3):258-62. PubMed ID: 23969916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Self-etch vs etch-and-rinse adhesives: effect of thermo-mechanical fatigue loading on marginal quality of bonded resin composite restorations.
Frankenberger R; Tay FR
Dent Mater; 2005 May; 21(5):397-412. PubMed ID: 15826696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bonding strength of silorane-based composite to Er-YAG laser prepared dentin.
Koliniotou-Koumpia E; Kouros P; Dionysopoulos D; Zafiriadis L
Lasers Med Sci; 2015 Feb; 30(2):509-16. PubMed ID: 23709011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of thermo-mechanical load cycling on silorane-based composite restorations.
Borges AF; Santos Jde S; Ramos CM; Ishikiriama SK; Shinohara MS
Dent Mater J; 2012; 31(6):1054-9. PubMed ID: 23207215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
