These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27804113)

  • 1. Can systematic reviews with sparse data be trusted?
    Afshari A; Wetterslev J; Smith AF
    Anaesthesia; 2017 Jan; 72(1):12-16. PubMed ID: 27804113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical Study Designs and Sources of Error in Medical Research.
    Kacha AK; Nizamuddin SL; Nizamuddin J; Ramakrishna H; Shahul SS
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2018 Dec; 32(6):2789-2801. PubMed ID: 29571641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reinventing the wheel? Or the emperor's new clothes.
    Oberbaum M; Vithoulkas G; van Haselen R; Singer S
    J Altern Complement Med; 2003 Oct; 9(5):613-5. PubMed ID: 14629837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. 21st Century Evidence: Randomized Controlled Trials Versus Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.
    Agarwal A; Rochwerg B; Sevransky JE
    Crit Care Med; 2021 Dec; 49(12):2001-2002. PubMed ID: 34582418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence: publication bias].
    Nolting A; Perleth M; Langer G; Meerpohl JJ; Gartlehner G; Kaminski-Hartenthaler A; Schünemann HJ
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2012; 106(9):670-6. PubMed ID: 23200211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Drug safety assessment in clinical trials: methodological challenges and opportunities.
    Singh S; Loke YK
    Trials; 2012 Aug; 13():138. PubMed ID: 22906139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Understanding research: 1. Methodologies used to answer research questions.
    Baxter H
    J Wound Care; 2001 Jul; 10(7):269-72. PubMed ID: 12964346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improving the quality of reporting in randomised controlled trials.
    Walker A; Nixon J
    J Wound Care; 2004 Mar; 13(3):103-6. PubMed ID: 15045804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis.
    Haase SC
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Feb; 127(2):955-966. PubMed ID: 21285802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach.
    Aromataris E; Fernandez R; Godfrey CM; Holly C; Khalil H; Tungpunkom P
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):132-40. PubMed ID: 26360830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evidence-based intervention for musculoskeletal disorders.
    Malmivaara A
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 1997 Jun; 23(3):161-3. PubMed ID: 9243725
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: Part 2: Randomized controlled trials.
    Manchikanti L; Hirsch JA; Smith HS
    Pain Physician; 2008; 11(6):717-73. PubMed ID: 19057624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials: the need for complete data.
    Clarke MJ; Stewart LA
    J Eval Clin Pract; 1995 Nov; 1(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 9238566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cochrane Reviews: Four Proposals for Improvement.
    Currow DC; Higginson IJ
    J Palliat Med; 2015 Nov; 18(11):906-7. PubMed ID: 26431264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Review of mixed treatment comparisons in published systematic reviews shows marked increase since 2009.
    Lee AW
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Feb; 67(2):138-43. PubMed ID: 24090930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. GRADE approach to rate the certainty from a network meta-analysis: addressing incoherence.
    Brignardello-Petersen R; Mustafa RA; Siemieniuk RAC; Murad MH; Agoritsas T; Izcovich A; Schünemann HJ; Guyatt GH;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Apr; 108():77-85. PubMed ID: 30529648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Deconstructing evidence in orthodontics: making sense of systematic reviews, randomized clinical trials, and meta-analyses.
    Rinchuse DJ; Rinchuse DJ; Kandasamy S; Ackerman MB
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 18575311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What is right and what is wrong about evidence-based medicine?
    Julian DG
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2003 Sep; 14(9 Suppl):S2-5. PubMed ID: 12950509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Meta-analyses and systematic errors in publications].
    Bias R
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 2001; 151(1-2):39-40. PubMed ID: 11281127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.