These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

341 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27804119)

  • 21. Can non-directional male mating preferences facilitate honest female ornamentation?
    Chenoweth SF; Doughty P; Kokko H
    Ecol Lett; 2006 Feb; 9(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 16958883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Remodeling male coercion and the evolution of sexual autonomy by mate choice.
    Snow SS; Prum RO
    Evolution; 2023 Jun; 77(7):1564-1577. PubMed ID: 37260260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. I'm sexy and I glow it: female ornamentation in a nocturnal capital breeder.
    Hopkins J; Baudry G; Candolin U; Kaitala A
    Biol Lett; 2015 Oct; 11(10):. PubMed ID: 26490414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Male choice generates stabilizing sexual selection on a female fecundity correlate.
    Chenoweth SF; Petfield D; Doughty P; Blows MW
    J Evol Biol; 2007 Sep; 20(5):1745-50. PubMed ID: 17714292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A potential resolution to the lek paradox through indirect genetic effects.
    Miller CW; Moore AJ
    Proc Biol Sci; 2007 May; 274(1615):1279-86. PubMed ID: 17341455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A cost of sexual attractiveness to high-fitness females.
    Long TA; Pischedda A; Stewart AD; Rice WR
    PLoS Biol; 2009 Dec; 7(12):e1000254. PubMed ID: 19997646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Glucocorticoids, male sexual signals, and mate choice by females: Implications for sexual selection.
    Leary CJ; Baugh AT
    Gen Comp Endocrinol; 2020 Mar; 288():113354. PubMed ID: 31830474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Direct selection on male attractiveness and female preference fails to produce a response.
    Hall M; Lindholm AK; Brooks R
    BMC Evol Biol; 2004 Jan; 4():1. PubMed ID: 14720309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The lek mating system of the worm pipefish (Nerophis lumbriciformis): a molecular maternity analysis and test of the phenotype-linked fertility hypothesis.
    Monteiro NM; Carneiro D; Antunes A; Queiroz N; Vieira MN; Jones AG
    Mol Ecol; 2017 Mar; 26(5):1371-1385. PubMed ID: 27864914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Density-dependent selection on mate search and evolution of Allee effects.
    Berec L; Kramer AM; Bernhauerová V; Drake JM
    J Anim Ecol; 2018 Jan; 87(1):24-35. PubMed ID: 28240356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The dynamics of sexually antagonistic coevolution and the complex influences of mating system and genetic correlation.
    Härdling R; Karlsson K
    J Theor Biol; 2009 Sep; 260(2):276-82. PubMed ID: 19500598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sexual selection, phenotypic plasticity and female reproductive output.
    Fox RJ; Fromhage L; Jennions MD
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2019 Mar; 374(1768):20180184. PubMed ID: 30966965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sexual selection and mate limitation shape evolution of species' range limits.
    Tschol M; Reid JM; Bocedi G
    Evolution; 2024 May; 78(5):951-963. PubMed ID: 38416475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Similar preferences for ornamentation in opposite- and same-sex choice experiments.
    Cardoso GC; Leitão AV; Funghi C; Batalha HR; Lopes RJ; Mota PG
    J Evol Biol; 2014 Dec; 27(12):2798-806. PubMed ID: 25371062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Experimental evidence that female ornamentation increases the acquisition of sperm and signals fecundity.
    Cornwallis CK; Birkhead TR
    Proc Biol Sci; 2007 Feb; 274(1609):583-90. PubMed ID: 17476780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Gentlemen prefer blondes: the evolution of mate preference among strategically allocated males.
    Rowell JT; Servedio MR
    Am Nat; 2009 Jan; 173(1):12-25. PubMed ID: 19063659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Runaway sexual selection without genetic correlations: social environments and flexible mate choice initiate and enhance the Fisher process.
    Bailey NW; Moore AJ
    Evolution; 2012 Sep; 66(9):2674-84. PubMed ID: 22946795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Direct detection of male quality can facilitate the evolution of female choosiness and indicators of good genes: Evolution across a continuum of indicator mechanisms.
    Dhole S; Stern CA; Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2018 Apr; 72(4):770-784. PubMed ID: 29528491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The role of ecology in speciation by sexual selection: a systematic empirical review.
    Scordato ES; Symes LB; Mendelson TC; Safran RJ
    J Hered; 2014; 105 Suppl 1():782-94. PubMed ID: 25149254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Stronger convex (stabilizing) selection on homologous sexual display traits in females than in males: a multipopulation comparison in Drosophila serrata.
    Rundle HD; Chenoweth SF
    Evolution; 2011 Mar; 65(3):893-9. PubMed ID: 21361917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.