These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

326 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27804119)

  • 41. Female discrimination thresholds frequently exceed local male display variation: implications for mate choice dynamics and sexual selection.
    Höbel G
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Mar; 29(3):572-82. PubMed ID: 26663413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Genetic variation in male attractiveness: It is time to see the forest for the trees.
    Prokop ZM; Drobniak SM
    Evolution; 2016 Apr; 70(4):913-21. PubMed ID: 26940698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Temporal variation in size-assortative mating and male mate choice in a spider with amphisexual care.
    Moura RR; Gonzaga MO
    Naturwissenschaften; 2017 Apr; 104(3-4):28. PubMed ID: 28289773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The Fisher process of sexual selection with the coevolution of preference strength.
    Xu K; Lerch BA; Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2023 Apr; 77(4):1043-1055. PubMed ID: 36757067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The costs of choice in sexual selection.
    Pomiankowski A
    J Theor Biol; 1987 Sep; 128(2):195-218. PubMed ID: 3431135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Adaptive plasticity in female mate choice dampens sexual selection on male ornaments in the lark bunting.
    Chaine AS; Lyon BE
    Science; 2008 Jan; 319(5862):459-62. PubMed ID: 18218896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Female mate choice, male-male competition, and male sexual traits: Experimental study of sexual selection directedness in Campbell's dwarf hamster (Phodopus campbelli Thomas 1905)].
    Vasilieva NY; Shekarova ON; Khrushchova AM; Rogovin KA
    Zh Obshch Biol; 2017; 78(2):14-31. PubMed ID: 30024675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Sexual signals and mating patterns in Syngnathidae.
    Rosenqvist G; Berglund A
    J Fish Biol; 2011 Jun; 78(6):1647-61. PubMed ID: 21651521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Signaling efficacy drives the evolution of larger sexual ornaments by sexual selection.
    Tazzyman SJ; Iwasa Y; Pomiankowski A
    Evolution; 2014 Jan; 68(1):216-29. PubMed ID: 24099137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Veiled preferences and cryptic female choice could underlie the origin of novel sexual traits.
    Moehring AJ; Boughman JW
    Biol Lett; 2019 Feb; 15(2):20180878. PubMed ID: 30958124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Measuring the fitness benefits of male mate choice in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Edward DA; Chapman T
    Evolution; 2012 Aug; 66(8):2646-53. PubMed ID: 22834761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Quantitative genetic models of female choice based on "arbitrary" male characters.
    Heisler IL
    Heredity (Edinb); 1985 Oct; 55 ( Pt 2)():187-98. PubMed ID: 4055415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Sexual selection is influenced by both developmental and adult environments.
    Gillespie SR; Scarlett Tudor M; Moore AJ; Miller CW
    Evolution; 2014 Dec; 68(12):3421-32. PubMed ID: 25226860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Bearded ladies: females suffer fitness consequences when bearing male traits.
    Swierk L; Langkilde T
    Biol Lett; 2013; 9(6):20130644. PubMed ID: 24196514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Mate-choice copying: A fitness-enhancing behavior that evolves by indirect selection.
    Santos M; Sapage M; Matos M; Varela SAM
    Evolution; 2017 Jun; 71(6):1456-1464. PubMed ID: 28334416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Indirect mate choice, direct mate choice and species recognition in a bower-building cichlid fish lek.
    Genner MJ; Young KA; Haesler MP; Joyce DA
    J Evol Biol; 2008 Sep; 21(5):1387-96. PubMed ID: 18547351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Structure of sexual networks determines the operation of sexual selection.
    McDonald GC; Pizzari T
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Jan; 115(1):E53-E61. PubMed ID: 29255016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Do male secondary sexual characters correlate with testis size and sperm length in the small hairy maggot blowfly?
    Jones SD; Wallman JF; Byrne PG
    Zoology (Jena); 2015 Dec; 118(6):439-45. PubMed ID: 26297128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Mate choice and the genetic basis for colour variation in a polymorphic dart frog: inferences from a wild pedigree.
    Richards-Zawacki CL; Wang IJ; Summers K
    Mol Ecol; 2012 Aug; 21(15):3879-92. PubMed ID: 22650383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Good vs complementary genes for parasite resistance and the evolution of mate choice.
    Howard RS; Lively CM
    BMC Evol Biol; 2004 Nov; 4():48. PubMed ID: 15555062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.