BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27804166)

  • 1. Factorial versus multi-arm multi-stage designs for clinical trials with multiple treatments.
    Jaki T; Vasileiou D
    Stat Med; 2017 Feb; 36(4):563-580. PubMed ID: 27804166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multi-arm multi-stage (MAMS) randomised selection designs: impact of treatment selection rules on the operating characteristics.
    Choodari-Oskooei B; Blenkinsop A; Handley K; Pinkney T; Parmar MKB
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2024 Jun; 24(1):124. PubMed ID: 38831421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adding new experimental arms to randomised clinical trials: Impact on error rates.
    Choodari-Oskooei B; Bratton DJ; Gannon MR; Meade AM; Sydes MR; Parmar MK
    Clin Trials; 2020 Jun; 17(3):273-284. PubMed ID: 32063029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multi-arm multi-stage trials can improve the efficiency of finding effective treatments for stroke: a case study.
    Jaki T; Wason JMS
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2018 Nov; 18(1):215. PubMed ID: 30482176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of multi-arm multi-stage design and adaptive randomization in platform clinical trials.
    Lin J; Bunn V
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2017 Mar; 54():48-59. PubMed ID: 28089763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Controlling the family-wise error rate in multi-arm, multi-stage trials.
    Crouch LA; Dodd LE; Proschan MA
    Clin Trials; 2017 Jun; 14(3):237-245. PubMed ID: 28545335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Type I error rates of multi-arm multi-stage clinical trials: strong control and impact of intermediate outcomes.
    Bratton DJ; Parmar MK; Phillips PP; Choodari-Oskooei B
    Trials; 2016 Jul; 17(1):309. PubMed ID: 27369182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Two-stage response adaptive randomization designs for multi-arm trials with binary outcome.
    Lu X; Shan G
    J Biopharm Stat; 2024 Jul; 34(4):526-538. PubMed ID: 37452825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of Bayesian adaptive randomization and multi-stage designs for multi-arm clinical trials.
    Wason JM; Trippa L
    Stat Med; 2014 Jun; 33(13):2206-21. PubMed ID: 24421053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factorial designs: an overview with applications to orthodontic clinical trials.
    Pandis N; Walsh T; Polychronopoulou A; Katsaros C; Eliades T
    Eur J Orthod; 2014 Jun; 36(3):314-20. PubMed ID: 23885023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Treatment selection in multi-arm multi-stage designs: With application to a postpartum haemorrhage trial.
    Choodari-Oskooei B; Thwin SS; Blenkinsop A; Widmer M; Althabe F; Parmar MK
    Clin Trials; 2023 Feb; 20(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 36647713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Combining factorial and multi-arm multi-stage platform designs to evaluate multiple interventions efficiently.
    White IR; Choodari-Oskooei B; Sydes MR; Kahan BC; McCabe L; Turkova A; Esmail H; Gibb DM; Ford D
    Clin Trials; 2022 Aug; 19(4):432-441. PubMed ID: 35579066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A multi-arm multi-stage clinical trial design for binary outcomes with application to tuberculosis.
    Bratton DJ; Phillips PP; Parmar MK
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Nov; 13():139. PubMed ID: 24229079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Current practice in methodology and reporting of the sample size calculation in randomised trials of hip and knee osteoarthritis: a protocol for a systematic review.
    Copsey B; Dutton S; Fitzpatrick R; Lamb SE; Cook JA
    Trials; 2017 Oct; 18(1):466. PubMed ID: 29017518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Non-factorial analyses of two-by-two factorial trial designs.
    Korn EL; Freidlin B
    Clin Trials; 2016 Dec; 13(6):651-659. PubMed ID: 27439306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of heterogeneous variance on efficiency and power of cluster randomized trials with a balanced 2 × 2 factorial design.
    Lemme F; van Breukelen GJ; Candel MJ; Berger MP
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2015 Oct; 24(5):574-93. PubMed ID: 25911332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A web application for the design of multi-arm clinical trials.
    Grayling MJ; Wason JM
    BMC Cancer; 2020 Jan; 20(1):80. PubMed ID: 32005187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing the impact of efficacy stopping rules on the error rates under the multi-arm multi-stage framework.
    Blenkinsop A; Parmar MK; Choodari-Oskooei B
    Clin Trials; 2019 Apr; 16(2):132-141. PubMed ID: 30648428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. When should factorial designs be used for late-phase randomised controlled trials?
    White IR; Szubert AJ; Choodari-Oskooei B; Walker AS; Parmar MK
    Clin Trials; 2024 Apr; 21(2):162-170. PubMed ID: 37904490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Designs for adding a treatment arm to an ongoing clinical trial.
    Bennett M; Mander AP
    Trials; 2020 Mar; 21(1):251. PubMed ID: 32143729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.