These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27804303)

  • 1. Identification of Preferential Paths of Fossil Carbon within Water Resource Recovery Facilities via Radiocarbon Analysis.
    Tseng LY; Robinson AK; Zhang X; Xu X; Southon J; Hamilton AJ; Sobhani R; Stenstrom MK; Rosso D
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Nov; 50(22):12166-12178. PubMed ID: 27804303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improved method for calculating CO
    Liu G; Huang Q; Song K; Pan Y; Zhang H
    Waste Manag; 2024 Feb; 174():164-173. PubMed ID: 38056365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Life cycle energy use and greenhouse gas emission analysis for a water resource recovery facility in India.
    Miller-Robbie L; Ramaswami A; Kumar P
    Water Environ Res; 2013 Jul; 85(7):621-31. PubMed ID: 23944144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mitigation of global greenhouse gas emissions from waste: conclusions and strategies from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report. Working Group III (Mitigation).
    Bogner J; Pipatti R; Hashimoto S; Diaz C; Mareckova K; Diaz L; Kjeldsen P; Monni S; Faaij A; Gao Q; Zhang T; Ahmed MA; Sutamihardja RT; Gregory R;
    Waste Manag Res; 2008 Feb; 26(1):11-32. PubMed ID: 18338699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fossil organic carbon in wastewater and its fate in treatment plants.
    Law Y; Jacobsen GE; Smith AM; Yuan Z; Lant P
    Water Res; 2013 Sep; 47(14):5270-81. PubMed ID: 23863394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. CO
    Caniani D; Caivano M; Pascale R; Bianco G; Mancini IM; Masi S; Mazzone G; Firouzian M; Rosso D
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Jan; 648():1130-1140. PubMed ID: 30340259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative energy and carbon footprint analysis of biosolids management strategies in water resource recovery facilities.
    Zhao G; Garrido-Baserba M; Reifsnyder S; Xu JC; Rosso D
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 May; 665():762-773. PubMed ID: 30790749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Challenges in carbon footprint evaluations of state-of-the-art municipal wastewater resource recovery facilities.
    Faragò M; Damgaard A; Rebsdorf M; Nielsen PH; Rygaard M
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Oct; 320():115715. PubMed ID: 35952558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multi-point monitoring of nitrous oxide emissions in three full-scale conventional activated sludge tanks in Europe.
    Bellandi G; Porro J; Senesi E; Caretti C; Caffaz S; Weijers S; Nopens I; Gori R
    Water Sci Technol; 2018 Feb; 77(3-4):880-890. PubMed ID: 29488951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Options to reduce greenhouse gas emissions during wastewater treatment for agricultural use.
    Fine P; Hadas E
    Sci Total Environ; 2012 Feb; 416():289-99. PubMed ID: 22209373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Methane emission during municipal wastewater treatment.
    Daelman MR; van Voorthuizen EM; van Dongen UG; Volcke EI; van Loosdrecht MC
    Water Res; 2012 Jul; 46(11):3657-70. PubMed ID: 22575155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Greenhouse gas production in wastewater treatment: process selection is the major factor.
    Keller J; Hartley K
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(12):43-8. PubMed ID: 12926668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. From wastewater treatment to water resource recovery: Environmental and economic impacts of full-scale implementation.
    Faragò M; Damgaard A; Madsen JA; Andersen JK; Thornberg D; Andersen MH; Rygaard M
    Water Res; 2021 Oct; 204():117554. PubMed ID: 34500179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Anaerobic digestion of different feedstocks: impact on energetic and environmental balances of biogas process.
    Bacenetti J; Negri M; Fiala M; González-García S
    Sci Total Environ; 2013 Oct; 463-464():541-51. PubMed ID: 23831800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. CO2 and the greenhouse effect: present assessment and perspectives.
    Oeschger H
    Ciba Found Symp; 1993; 175():2-17; discussion 17-22. PubMed ID: 8222992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Benchmarking the sustainability of sludge handling systems in small wastewater treatment plants.
    Archer G; Jin C; Parker W
    J Environ Manage; 2020 Feb; 256():109893. PubMed ID: 31822457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of direct greenhouse gas emissions on the carbon footprint of water reclamation processes employing nitrification-denitrification.
    Schneider AG; Townsend-Small A; Rosso D
    Sci Total Environ; 2015 Feb; 505():1166-73. PubMed ID: 25461114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determining national greenhouse gas emissions from waste-to-energy using the Balance Method.
    Schwarzböck T; Rechberger H; Cencic O; Fellner J
    Waste Manag; 2016 Mar; 49():263-271. PubMed ID: 26847720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Methane and carbon dioxide emissions from inland waters in India - implications for large scale greenhouse gas balances.
    Panneer Selvam B; Natchimuthu S; Arunachalam L; Bastviken D
    Glob Chang Biol; 2014 Nov; 20(11):3397-407. PubMed ID: 24623552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Changes in greenhouse gas balance and resource demand of biogas plants in southern Germany after a period of three years.
    Bachmaier H; Effenberger M; Gronauer A; Boxberger J
    Waste Manag Res; 2013 Apr; 31(4):368-75. PubMed ID: 23129609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.