196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27805431)
1. Sensation of smell and taste during intravenous injection of iodinated contrast media in CT examinations.
Yamaguchi N; Fukushima Y; Yamaguchi A; Nagasawa N; Taketomi-Takahashi A; Suto T; Tsushima Y
Br J Radiol; 2017 Jan; 90(1069):20160629. PubMed ID: 27805431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Are there any differences in acute adverse reactions among five low-osmolar non-ionic iodinated contrast media?
Gomi T; Nagamoto M; Hasegawa M; Katoh A; Sugiyama M; Murata N; Kunihiro T; Kohda E
Eur Radiol; 2010 Jul; 20(7):1631-5. PubMed ID: 20033176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Acute Adverse Reactions to Nonionic Iodinated Contrast Media: A Meta-Analysis.
Suh YJ; Yoon SH; Hong H; Hahn S; Kang DY; Kang HR; Choi YH; Lee W
Invest Radiol; 2019 Sep; 54(9):589-599. PubMed ID: 30998567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Iopentol (Imagopaque 300) compared with iopromide (Ultravist 300) in abdominal CT. A multi-centre monitoring trial assessing adverse events and diagnostic information--results from 518 patients in Spain.
Encina JL; Martí-Bonmatí L; Ronchera-Oms CL; Rodríguez V
Eur Radiol; 1997; 7 Suppl 4():S115-9. PubMed ID: 9204351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Iomeprol versus iopromide for intravenous urography.
de Geeter P; Melchior H
Br J Radiol; 1994 Oct; 67(802):958-63. PubMed ID: 8000839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Contrast medium-enhanced radiation damage caused by CT examinations.
Grudzenski S; Kuefner MA; Heckmann MB; Uder M; Löbrich M
Radiology; 2009 Dec; 253(3):706-14. PubMed ID: 19789225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. High iodine concentration contrast material for noninvasive multislice computed tomography coronary angiography: iopromide 370 versus iomeprol 400.
Cademartiri F; de Monye C; Pugliese F; Mollet NR; Runza G; van der Lugt A; Midiri M; de Feyter PJ; Lagalla R; Krestin GP
Invest Radiol; 2006 Mar; 41(3):349-53. PubMed ID: 16481919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Incidence of ventricular fibrillation during left coronary arteriography in pigs: comparison of a solution of the nonionic dimer iodixanol with solutions of five different nonionic monomers.
Chai CM; Karlsson JO; Almén T
Acta Radiol; 2008 Mar; 49(2):150-6. PubMed ID: 18300138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of Different Iodine Concentrations on Patient-Reported Discomfort in Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography: A Prospective Comparative Trial.
Vahldiek JL; Schaafs LA; Niehues BK; Hamm B; Niehues SM
Rofo; 2020 Oct; 192(10):945-951. PubMed ID: 32215899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Safety profile and protocol prevention of adverse reactions to uroangiographic contrast media in diagnostic imaging.
Rossi C; Reginelli A; D'Amora M; Di Grezia G; Mandato Y; D'Andrea A; Brunese L; Grassi R; Rotondi A
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents; 2014; 28(1):155-65. PubMed ID: 24750802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Non-ionic iodinated dimeric versus monomeric X-ray contrast media: effects on complement factors in vivo].
Böhm I; Speck U; Schild H
Rofo; 2006 Mar; 178(3):306-12. PubMed ID: 16508838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Acute adverse reactions to iopromide vs iomeprol: a retrospective analysis of spontaneous reporting from a radiology department.
García M; Aguirre U; Martinez A; Ruiz B; Lertxundi U; Aguirre C
Br J Radiol; 2014 Jan; 87(1033):20130511. PubMed ID: 24191124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of intravenous low-osmolality iodinated contrast media on patients with myasthenia gravis.
Somashekar DK; Davenport MS; Cohan RH; Dillman JR; Ellis JH
Radiology; 2013 Jun; 267(3):727-34. PubMed ID: 23360741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of iopromide with iopamidol and iohexol for contrast-enhanced computed tomography.
Goldberg SN; Abrahams J; Drayer BP; Golding S; Bernardino M; Brunetti J
Invest Radiol; 1994 May; 29 Suppl 1():S76-83; discussion S93. PubMed ID: 8071050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intravenous injection of high and medium concentrations of computed tomography contrast media and related heat sensation, local pain, and adverse reactions.
Masui T; Katayama M; Kobayashi S; Sakahara H
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2005; 29(5):704-8. PubMed ID: 16163047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prevalence of acute reactions to iopromide: postmarketing surveillance study of 74,717 patients.
Kopp AF; Mortele KJ; Cho YD; Palkowitsch P; Bettmann MA; Claussen CD
Acta Radiol; 2008 Oct; 49(8):902-11. PubMed ID: 18651252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Oral administration of intravenous contrast media: a tasty alternative to conventional oral contrast media in computed tomography].
Diederichs G; Franiel T; Asbach P; Romano V; Hamm B; Rogalla P
Rofo; 2007 Oct; 179(10):1061-7. PubMed ID: 17786895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patient Discomfort during Carotid Artery Stenting: A Comparison Study between Iodixanol versus Iopamidol.
Borrelli MP; Setacci F; de Donato G; Galzerano G; Benevento D; Mele M; Rosadini D; Messina G; Setacci C
Ann Vasc Surg; 2017 Feb; 39():167-172. PubMed ID: 27521830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficacy and safety of iopromide for excretory urography.
Newhouse JH; Landman J; Lang E; Amis ES; Goldman S; Khazan R; Leder R; Hedgcock M
Invest Radiol; 1994 May; 29 Suppl 1():S68-73. PubMed ID: 8071049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Double-blind randomized study comparing ioversol 300 versus iopromide 300 abdominal computed tomography (CT scanner)].
Hoogewoud HM; Neiss AC; Woessmer B
Ann Radiol (Paris); 1992; 35(4 Pt 2):273-5. PubMed ID: 1296490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
