358 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27805732)
1. Biomechanical Testing and Histologic Examination of Intradermal Skin Closure in Dogs Using Barbed Suture Device and Non-Barbed Monofilament Suture.
Law AY; Butler JR; Patnaik SS; Cooley JA; Elder SH
Vet Surg; 2017 Jan; 46(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 27805732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ex vivo comparison of intradermal closures with conventional monofilament suture vs unidirectional barbed suture in dogs.
Regier PJ; Smeak DD; McGilvray KC
Vet Surg; 2019 Nov; 48(8):1399-1405. PubMed ID: 31271237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An in vivo comparison of barbed suture devices and conventional monofilament sutures for cosmetic skin closure: biomechanical wound strength and histology.
Zaruby J; Gingras K; Taylor J; Maul D
Aesthet Surg J; 2011 Feb; 31(2):232-40. PubMed ID: 21317121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of V-Loc™ 180 wound closure device and Quill™ PDO knotless tissue-closure device for intradermal closure in a porcine in vivo model: evaluation of biomechanical wound strength.
Gingras K; Zaruby J; Maul D
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2012 May; 100(4):1053-8. PubMed ID: 22287058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Security and biomechanical strength of three end-pass configurations for the terminal end of intradermal closures performed with unidirectional barbed suture material in dogs.
Regier PJ; Smeak DD; McGilvray KC
Am J Vet Res; 2016 Dec; 77(12):1392-1400. PubMed ID: 27901383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In Vivo Comparison of MONOFIX, A Novel Barbed Suture with a Triangular Stopper, with Pre-existing Products in a Porcine Model.
Kim J; Eom HJ; Shin H; Jeong SY; Kim MS; Yoon HS; In CH; Kim BG; Bae DS; Lee JW
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 27(2):473-481. PubMed ID: 30959198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of leak pressures for single-layer simple continuous suture pattern for cystotomy closure using barbed and monofilament suture material in an ex vivo canine model.
Kieves NR; Krebs AI
Vet Surg; 2017 Apr; 46(3):412-416. PubMed ID: 28177538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ex vivo biomechanical comparison of V-LOC 180® absorbable wound closure device and standard polyglyconate suture for diaphragmatic herniorrhaphy in a canine model.
Templeton MM; Krebs AI; Kraus KH; Hedlund CS
Vet Surg; 2015 Jan; 44(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 24962167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vivo assessment of absorbable knotless barbed suture for single layer gastrotomy and enterotomy closure.
Ehrhart NP; Kaminskaya K; Miller JA; Zaruby JF
Vet Surg; 2013 Feb; 42(2):210-6. PubMed ID: 23373618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical properties of canine staphylectomies closed with barbed or smooth suture.
Gleason HE; Phillips H; McCoy AM; Gutierrez-Nibeyro SD; McKiernan BC; Duffy DJ; Feign IM; Kim WJ; Kersh ME
Vet Surg; 2021 Jan; 50(1):196-206. PubMed ID: 33232530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is There an Advantage to Knotless Barbed Suture in TKA Wound Closure? A Randomized Trial in Simultaneous Bilateral TKAs.
Sah AP
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 473(6):2019-27. PubMed ID: 25631171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tensile Comparison of Polydioxanone, Polyglyconate, and Barbed Glycolide-Trimethylene Carbonate Suture in Canine Cadaveric Tensor Fascia Lata.
Shimizu N; Tarlton J; Friend E; Doran I; Parsons K
Vet Surg; 2017 Jan; 46(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 27906473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vivo assessment of an absorbable and nonabsorbable knotless barbed suture for laparoscopic single-layer enterotomy closure: a clinical and biomechanical comparison against nonbarbed suture.
Omotosho P; Yurcisin B; Ceppa E; Miller J; Kirsch D; Portenier DD
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2011 Dec; 21(10):893-7. PubMed ID: 22129144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of a barbed suture device versus conventional suture in a canine enterotomy model.
Miller J; Zaruby J; Kaminskaya K
J Invest Surg; 2012 Apr; 25(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 22439837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of barbed unidirectional suture with figure-of-eight standard sutures in vaginal cuff closure in total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Karacan T; Ozyurek E; Usta T; Odacilar E; Hanli U; Kovalak E; Dayan H
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2018 Aug; 38(6):842-847. PubMed ID: 29577776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ex vivo comparison of barbed sutures for pelvic flexure enterotomy in horses.
Sinovich M; Archer DC; Meunier NV; Kelly PG
Vet Surg; 2020 Apr; 49(3):487-495. PubMed ID: 31724764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Knotless Barbed Suture Versus Monofilament Suture in the Oral Cavity of Cats.
Durand CL
J Vet Dent; 2017 Sep; 34(3):148-154. PubMed ID: 28635369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of barbed suture on leak pressures after double-layer inverting closure of cystotomy sites in sheep.
Duffy DJ; Duddy HR; Keating S; Gutierrez-Nibeyro SD
Vet Surg; 2018 Oct; 47(7):902-907. PubMed ID: 30178885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of surgical time and complication rate of subcutaneous and skin closure using barbed suture or traditional knotted suture in dogs.
Nutt LK; Wilson ML; Sakals S
Can Vet J; 2017 Dec; 58(12):1281-1286. PubMed ID: 29203937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of two novel self-anchoring barbed sutures in a prophylactic laparoscopic gastropexy compared with intracorporeal tied knots.
Spah CE; Elkins AD; Wehrenberg A; Jaffe MH; Baird DK; Naughton JF; Payton ME
Vet Surg; 2013 Nov; 42(8):932-42. PubMed ID: 24111750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
