358 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27805732)
21. Comparison of tensile strength among simple interrupted, cruciate, intradermal, and subdermal suture patterns for incision closure in ex vivo canine skin specimens.
Zellner EM; Hedlund CS; Kraus KH; Burton AF; Kieves NR
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2016 Jun; 248(12):1377-82. PubMed ID: 27270059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A randomized 'N-of-1' single blinded clinical trial of barbed dermal sutures vs. smooth sutures in elective plastic surgery shows differences in scar appearance two-years post-operatively.
Koide S; Smoll NR; Liew J; Smith K; Rizzitelli A; Findlay MW; Hunter-Smith DJ
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Jul; 68(7):1003-9. PubMed ID: 25840525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Ex vivo biomechanical comparison of barbed suture and standard polypropylene suture for acute tendon laceration in a canine model.
Duffy DJ; Main RP; Moore GE; Breur GJ; Millard RP
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2015; 28(4):263-9. PubMed ID: 26037406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Barbed suture for gastrointestinal closure: a randomized control trial.
Demyttenaere SV; Nau P; Henn M; Beck C; Zaruby J; Primavera M; Kirsch D; Miller J; Liu JJ; Bellizzi A; Melvin WS
Surg Innov; 2009 Sep; 16(3):237-42. PubMed ID: 19783567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of initial leak pressures after single- and double-layer cystotomy closure with barbed and nonbarbed monofilament suture material in an ex vivo ovine model.
Duffy DJ; Kindra CG; Moore GE
Vet Surg; 2019 Apr; 48(3):424-430. PubMed ID: 30635932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Single layer cystotomy closure of excised porcine bladders with barbed versus smooth suture material.
Montel JS; Duffy DJ; Weng HY; Freeman LJ
Vet Surg; 2017 May; 46(4):580-586. PubMed ID: 28463428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Hair-sparing technique using absorbable intradermal barbed suture versus traditional closure methods in supratentorial craniotomies for tumor.
Luther E; Berry K; McCarthy D; Sandhu J; Mayrand R; Guerrero C; Eichberg DG; Buttrick S; Shah A; Richardson AM; Komotar R; Ivan M
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2020 Apr; 162(4):719-727. PubMed ID: 32002670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Ex vivo comparison of single-layer and double-layer laparoscopic closure of equine bladders with 2 types of barbed sutures.
Major DS; Duff AH; Cohen ND; Hardy J
Vet Surg; 2017 Nov; 46(8):1145-1153. PubMed ID: 28972268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing absorbable barbed sutures versus conventional absorbable sutures for dermal closure in open surgical procedures.
Rubin JP; Hunstad JP; Polynice A; Gusenoff JA; Schoeller T; Dunn R; Walgenbach KJ; Hansen JE
Aesthet Surg J; 2014 Feb; 34(2):272-83. PubMed ID: 24421408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison between barbed and conventional sutures for longitudinal thelotomy closure in an
Sarkisian NW; Mulon PY
Can Vet J; 2022 May; 63(5):535-539. PubMed ID: 35502261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A comparison of 2 different suture patterns for skin closure of canine ovariohysterectomy.
Sylvestre A; Wilson J; Hare J
Can Vet J; 2002 Sep; 43(9):699-702. PubMed ID: 12240527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of two suture materials for intradermal skin closure in dogs.
Kirpensteijn J; Maarschalkerweerd RJ; Koeman JP; Kooistra HS; van Sluijs FJ
Vet Q; 1997 Mar; 19(1):20-2. PubMed ID: 9225425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of three closure methods and two absorbable suture materials for closure of jejunal enterotomy incisions in healthy dogs.
Kirpensteijn J; Maarschalkerweerd RJ; van der Gaag I; Kooistra HS; van Sluijs FJ
Vet Q; 2001 Apr; 23(2):67-70. PubMed ID: 11361101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of continuous intradermal with simple interrupted suture pattern: an experimental study in dogs.
Gouletsou PG; Prassinos NN; Papazoglou LG; Kostoulas P; Galatos AD
Top Companion Anim Med; 2020 Nov; 41():100454. PubMed ID: 32823154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Close orthopedic surgery skin incision with combination of barbed sutures and running subcuticular suturing technique for less dermal tension concentration: a finite element analysis.
Li L; Shao Q; He W; Wang T; Wang F
J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 May; 18(1):333. PubMed ID: 37147669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A Prospective, Randomized Evaluation of the Quality of Wound Closure With Barbed Versus Standard Suture After Total Joint Arthroplasty.
Sah AP
Orthopedics; 2021; 44(4):216-222. PubMed ID: 34292819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of barbed and conventional sutures in adhesion formation and histological features in a rat myomectomy model: randomized single blind controlled trial.
Api M; Boza A; Cıkman MS; Aker FV; Onenerk M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Feb; 185():121-5. PubMed ID: 25562637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Are Barbed Sutures Associated With 90-day Reoperation Rates After Primary TKA?
Austin DC; Keeney BJ; Dempsey BE; Koenig KM
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Nov; 475(11):2655-2665. PubMed ID: 28801877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of absorbable and nonabsorbable sutures for intradermal skin closure in cats.
Papazoglou LG; Tsioli V; Papaioannou N; Georgiadis M; Savvas I; Prassinos N; Kouti V; Bikiaris D; Hadzigiannakis C; Zavros N
Can Vet J; 2010 Jul; 51(7):770-2. PubMed ID: 20885834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A comparison between barbed and nonbarbed absorbable suture for fascial closure in a porcine model.
Oni G; Brown SA; Kenkel JM
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2012 Oct; 130(4):535e-540e. PubMed ID: 23018714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
