These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27806754)
81. Advances in bioprinting using additive manufacturing. Singh M; Jonnalagadda S Eur J Pharm Sci; 2020 Feb; 143():105167. PubMed ID: 31778785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
82. Mechanical characterization of structurally porous biomaterials built via additive manufacturing: experiments, predictive models, and design maps for load-bearing bone replacement implants. Melancon D; Bagheri ZS; Johnston RB; Liu L; Tanzer M; Pasini D Acta Biomater; 2017 Nov; 63():350-368. PubMed ID: 28927929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
83. Tissues and organ printing: An evolution of technology and materials. Singh G; Singh S; Kumar R; Parkash C; Pruncu C; Ramakrishna S Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2022 Dec; 236(12):1695-1710. PubMed ID: 36134552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
84. 3D printing in dentistry. Dawood A; Marti Marti B; Sauret-Jackson V; Darwood A Br Dent J; 2015 Dec; 219(11):521-9. PubMed ID: 26657435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
85. Advances in Regenerative Medicine and Biomaterials. Şeker Ş; Elçin AE; Elçin YM Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2575():127-152. PubMed ID: 36301474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
86. Reconstruction of the anterior chest wall with a 3-dimensionally printed biodynamic prosthesis. Cano JR; Escobar FH; Alonso DP; Rivero LL J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Jan; 155(1):e59-e60. PubMed ID: 28986038 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
87. Microscopic full-field three-dimensional strain measurement during the mechanical testing of additively manufactured porous biomaterials. Genovese K; Leeflang S; Zadpoor AA J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 May; 69():327-341. PubMed ID: 28153759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
88. Translating Biofabrication to the Market. Costa PF Trends Biotechnol; 2019 Oct; 37(10):1032-1036. PubMed ID: 31153633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
89. Patient-Specific Orbital Implants: Development and Implementation of Technology for More Accurate Orbital Reconstruction. Podolsky DJ; Mainprize JG; Edwards GP; Antonyshyn OM J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Jan; 27(1):131-3. PubMed ID: 26674886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
90. [Biomaterials used for reparative and reconstructive surgery]. Gu Q Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Apr; 20(4):349-54. PubMed ID: 16683428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
91. Bench-to-bedside: Feasibility of nano-engineered and drug-delivery biomaterials for bone-anchored implants and periodontal applications. Kunrath MF; Shah FA; Dahlin C Mater Today Bio; 2023 Feb; 18():100540. PubMed ID: 36632628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
92. Cranial reconstruction: 3D biomodel and custom-built implant created using additive manufacturing. Jardini AL; Larosa MA; Maciel Filho R; Zavaglia CA; Bernardes LF; Lambert CS; Calderoni DR; Kharmandayan P J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1877-84. PubMed ID: 25175080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
93. [Issues confronted with biomaterials research and development and market access in craniomaxillofacial field]. Hu M Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Nov; 51(11):641-645. PubMed ID: 27806754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
94. 3D printing for clinical application in otorhinolaryngology. Zhong N; Zhao X Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Dec; 274(12):4079-4089. PubMed ID: 28929219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
95. Use of 3-D printing technologies in craniomaxillofacial surgery: a review. Ghai S; Sharma Y; Jain N; Satpathy M; Pillai AK Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Sep; 22(3):249-259. PubMed ID: 29797107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
96. Research progress and perspective of metallic implant biomaterials for craniomaxillofacial surgeries. Li H; Hao J; Liu X Biomater Sci; 2024 Jan; 12(2):252-269. PubMed ID: 38170634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]