These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27807059)

  • 1. The communications gap between scientists and public: More scientists and their institutions feel a need to communicate the results and nature of research with the public.
    Hunter P
    EMBO Rep; 2016 Nov; 17(11):1513-1515. PubMed ID: 27807059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The responsibility of scientists to the community: a discussion.
    Ciba Found Symp; 1971; 1():61-76. PubMed ID: 5212140
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Challenges in conducting community-driven research created by differing ways of talking and thinking about science: a researcher's perspective.
    Colquhoun A; Geary J; Goodman KJ
    Int J Circumpolar Health; 2013; 72():. PubMed ID: 23986884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Science communication. Interactions with the mass media.
    Peters HP; Brossard D; de Cheveigné S; Dunwoody S; Kallfass M; Miller S; Tsuchida S
    Science; 2008 Jul; 321(5886):204-5. PubMed ID: 18625578
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What scientists funded by the tobacco industry believe about the hazards of cigarette smoking.
    Cummings KM; Sciandra R; Gingrass A; Davis R
    Am J Public Health; 1991 Jul; 81(7):894-6. PubMed ID: 2053667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Whither lay epidemiology in UK public health policy and practice? Some reflections on occupational and environmental health opportunities.
    Watterson A
    J Public Health Med; 1994 Sep; 16(3):270-4. PubMed ID: 7999376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Disseminating research results to research participants and their communities.
    Mfutso-Bengo J; Ndebele P; Masiye F
    Malawi Med J; 2008 Jun; 20(2):64-6. PubMed ID: 19537435
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How to make your research jump off the page: Co-creation to broaden public engagement in medical research.
    Finley N; Swartz TH; Cao K; Tucker JD
    PLoS Med; 2020 Sep; 17(9):e1003246. PubMed ID: 32925970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Public views regarding the responsibility of patients, clinicians, and institutions to participate in research in the United States.
    Weinfurt KP; Lin L; Sugarman J
    Clin Trials; 2019 Dec; 16(6):574-579. PubMed ID: 31256635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biotechnology and culture: the impact of public debates on government regulation in the United States and Denmark.
    Baark E; Jamison A
    Technol Soc; 1990; 12(1):27-44. PubMed ID: 11650912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How European and U.S. genetic engineering scientists view the impact of public attention on their field: a comparison.
    Rabino I
    Sci Technol Human Values; 1994; 19(1):23-46. PubMed ID: 11654086
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The need for unity in the biomedical research community.
    Kirschner M
    Acad Med; 1991 Oct; 66(10):577-82. PubMed ID: 1910389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. More than ever, scientists need to engage with the public: the stakes are high and they may be for keeps.
    Smith DR
    EMBO Rep; 2017 Feb; 18(2):185-186. PubMed ID: 28031246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Public involvement in research: making sense of the diversity.
    Oliver S; Liabo K; Stewart R; Rees R
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2015 Jan; 20(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 25228453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Combating antiscience: Are we preparing for the 2020s?
    Hotez PJ
    PLoS Biol; 2020 Mar; 18(3):e3000683. PubMed ID: 32218568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Human Genome Project: an examination of its challenge to the technological imperative.
    Koski CA
    New Genet Soc; 2005 Dec; 24(3):265-81. PubMed ID: 16610129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Genome square: will direct conversations between scientists and the public become a new method for the communication of science in the society?].
    Kato K
    Tanpakushitsu Kakusan Koso; 2005 Dec; 50(16 Suppl):2302-7. PubMed ID: 16411466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patient and public involvement in infection clinical research.
    Grier S; Gibson A; Micciche A; Berry E; MacGowan A
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2018 Nov; 24(11):1121-1122. PubMed ID: 29906590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. FameLab USA: Improving Science Communication Skills for Early Career Scientists.
    Scalice D; Dolci W; Brochu L; Merriman T; Davis H; Billings L; Voytek MA
    Astrobiology; 2019 Apr; 19(4):614-623. PubMed ID: 30855164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Workshop Summary: Enhancing Opportunities for Training and Retention of a Diverse Biomedical Workforce.
    Duncan GA; Lockett A; Villegas LR; Almodovar S; Gomez JL; Flores SC; Wilkes DS; Tigno XT
    Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2016 Apr; 13(4):562-7. PubMed ID: 27058184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.