727 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27807699)
1. Position paper on screening for breast cancer by the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI) and 30 national breast radiology bodies from Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Israel, Lithuania, Moldova, The Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and Turkey.
Sardanelli F; Aase HS; Álvarez M; Azavedo E; Baarslag HJ; Balleyguier C; Baltzer PA; Beslagic V; Bick U; Bogdanovic-Stojanovic D; Briediene R; Brkljacic B; Camps Herrero J; Colin C; Cornford E; Danes J; de Geer G; Esen G; Evans A; Fuchsjaeger MH; Gilbert FJ; Graf O; Hargaden G; Helbich TH; Heywang-Köbrunner SH; Ivanov V; Jónsson Á; Kuhl CK; Lisencu EC; Luczynska E; Mann RM; Marques JC; Martincich L; Mortier M; Müller-Schimpfle M; Ormandi K; Panizza P; Pediconi F; Pijnappel RM; Pinker K; Rissanen T; Rotaru N; Saguatti G; Sella T; Slobodníková J; Talk M; Taourel P; Trimboli RM; Vejborg I; Vourtsis A; Forrai G
Eur Radiol; 2017 Jul; 27(7):2737-2743. PubMed ID: 27807699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. One-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (MBTST): a prospective, population-based, diagnostic accuracy study.
Zackrisson S; Lång K; Rosso A; Johnson K; Dustler M; Förnvik D; Förnvik H; Sartor H; Timberg P; Tingberg A; Andersson I
Lancet Oncol; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1493-1503. PubMed ID: 30322817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cumulative Probability of False-Positive Results After 10 Years of Screening With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography.
Ho TH; Bissell MCS; Kerlikowske K; Hubbard RA; Sprague BL; Lee CI; Tice JA; Tosteson ANA; Miglioretti DL
JAMA Netw Open; 2022 Mar; 5(3):e222440. PubMed ID: 35333365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Double reading of automated breast ultrasound with digital mammography or digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer screening.
Lee JM; Partridge SC; Liao GJ; Hippe DS; Kim AE; Lee CI; Rahbar H; Scheel JR; Lehman CD
Clin Imaging; 2019; 55():119-125. PubMed ID: 30807927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Tailored Breast Screening Trial (TBST)].
Paci E; Mantellini P; Giorgi Rossi P; Falini P; Puliti D;
Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(4-5):317-27. PubMed ID: 24293498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of implementing digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) instead of mammography on population screening outcomes including interval cancer rates: Results of the Trento DBT pilot evaluation.
Bernardi D; Gentilini MA; De Nisi M; Pellegrini M; Fantò C; Valentini M; Sabatino V; Luparia A; Houssami N
Breast; 2020 Apr; 50():135-140. PubMed ID: 31607526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The role of the state in financing and regulating primary care in Europe: a taxonomy.
Espinosa-González AB; Delaney BC; Marti J; Darzi A
Health Policy; 2021 Feb; 125(2):168-176. PubMed ID: 33358033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography in a population-based breast cancer screening programme (To-Be): a randomised, controlled trial.
Hofvind S; Holen ÅS; Aase HS; Houssami N; Sebuødegård S; Moger TA; Haldorsen IS; Akslen LA
Lancet Oncol; 2019 Jun; 20(6):795-805. PubMed ID: 31078459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The cost-effectiveness of digital breast tomosynthesis in a population breast cancer screening program.
Wang J; Phi XA; Greuter MJW; Daszczuk AM; Feenstra TL; Pijnappel RM; Vermeulen KM; Buls N; Houssami N; Lu W; de Bock GH
Eur Radiol; 2020 Oct; 30(10):5437-5445. PubMed ID: 32382844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Screening: The Reggio Emilia Tomosynthesis Randomized Trial.
Pattacini P; Nitrosi A; Giorgi Rossi P; Iotti V; Ginocchi V; Ravaioli S; Vacondio R; Braglia L; Cavuto S; Campari C;
Radiology; 2018 Aug; 288(2):375-385. PubMed ID: 29869961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Breast cancer screening programmes and self-reported mammography use in European countries.
Cardoso R; Hoffmeister M; Brenner H
Int J Cancer; 2023 Jun; 152(12):2512-2527. PubMed ID: 36883419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis in Breast Cancer Screening: The Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial.
Skaane P; Bandos AI; Niklason LT; Sebuødegård S; Østerås BH; Gullien R; Gur D; Hofvind S
Radiology; 2019 Apr; 291(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 30777808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): recommendations from the Italian College of Breast Radiologists (ICBR) by the Italian Society of Medical Radiology (SIRM) and the Italian Group for Mammography Screening (GISMa).
Bernardi D; Belli P; Benelli E; Brancato B; Bucchi L; Calabrese M; Carbonaro LA; Caumo F; Cavallo-Marincola B; Clauser P; Fedato C; Frigerio A; Galli V; Giordano L; Giorgi Rossi P; Golinelli P; Morrone D; Mariscotti G; Martincich L; Montemezzi S; Naldoni C; Paduos A; Panizza P; Pediconi F; Querci F; Rizzo A; Saguatti G; Tagliafico A; Trimboli RM; Zappa M; Zuiani C; Sardanelli F
Radiol Med; 2017 Oct; 122(10):723-730. PubMed ID: 28540564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Compared With Digital Mammography: Outcomes Analysis From 3 Years of Breast Cancer Screening.
McDonald ES; Oustimov A; Weinstein SP; Synnestvedt MB; Schnall M; Conant EF
JAMA Oncol; 2016 Jun; 2(6):737-43. PubMed ID: 26893205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study.
Ciatto S; Houssami N; Bernardi D; Caumo F; Pellegrini M; Brunelli S; Tuttobene P; Bricolo P; Fantò C; Valentini M; Montemezzi S; Macaskill P
Lancet Oncol; 2013 Jun; 14(7):583-9. PubMed ID: 23623721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Collaborative Modeling to Compare Different Breast Cancer Screening Strategies: A Decision Analysis for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
Trentham-Dietz A; Chapman CH; Jayasekera J; Lowry KP; Heckman-Stoddard BM; Hampton JM; Caswell-Jin JL; Gangnon RE; Lu Y; Huang H; Stein S; Sun L; Gil Quessep EJ; Yang Y; Lu Y; Song J; Muñoz DF; Li Y; Kurian AW; Kerlikowske K; O'Meara ES; Sprague BL; Tosteson ANA; Feuer EJ; Berry D; Plevritis SK; Huang X; de Koning HJ; van Ravesteyn NT; Lee SJ; Alagoz O; Schechter CB; Stout NK; Miglioretti DL; Mandelblatt JS
JAMA; 2024 Jun; 331(22):1947-1960. PubMed ID: 38687505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Surveillance of the Second Wave of COVID-19 in Europe: Longitudinal Trend Analyses.
Post L; Culler K; Moss CB; Murphy RL; Achenbach CJ; Ison MG; Resnick D; Singh LN; White J; Boctor MJ; Welch SB; Oehmke JF
JMIR Public Health Surveill; 2021 Apr; 7(4):e25695. PubMed ID: 33818391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast cancer detection using single-reading of breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) compared to double-reading of 2D-mammography: Evidence from a population-based trial.
Houssami N; Bernardi D; Pellegrini M; Valentini M; Fantò C; Ostillio L; Tuttobene P; Luparia A; Macaskill P
Cancer Epidemiol; 2017 Apr; 47():94-99. PubMed ID: 28192742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
