725 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27807699)
21. Breast cancer screening in women with extremely dense breasts recommendations of the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI).
Mann RM; Athanasiou A; Baltzer PAT; Camps-Herrero J; Clauser P; Fallenberg EM; Forrai G; Fuchsjäger MH; Helbich TH; Killburn-Toppin F; Lesaru M; Panizza P; Pediconi F; Pijnappel RM; Pinker K; Sardanelli F; Sella T; Thomassin-Naggara I; Zackrisson S; Gilbert FJ; Kuhl CK;
Eur Radiol; 2022 Jun; 32(6):4036-4045. PubMed ID: 35258677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of direct digital mammography, computed radiography, and film-screen in the French national breast cancer screening program.
Séradour B; Heid P; Estève J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Jan; 202(1):229-36. PubMed ID: 24370149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Centenarians in Europe.
Teixeira L; Araújo L; Jopp D; Ribeiro O
Maturitas; 2017 Oct; 104():90-95. PubMed ID: 28923181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of breast cancers detected in the Verona screening program following transition to digital breast tomosynthesis screening with cancers detected at digital mammography screening.
Caumo F; Romanucci G; Hunter K; Zorzi M; Brunelli S; Macaskill P; Houssami N
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Jul; 170(2):391-397. PubMed ID: 29557996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Implementation of digital mammography in a population-based breast cancer screening program: effect of screening round on recall rate and cancer detection.
Sala M; Comas M; Macià F; Martinez J; Casamitjana M; Castells X
Radiology; 2009 Jul; 252(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 19420316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Collaborative Modeling of the Benefits and Harms Associated With Different U.S. Breast Cancer Screening Strategies.
Mandelblatt JS; Stout NK; Schechter CB; van den Broek JJ; Miglioretti DL; Krapcho M; Trentham-Dietz A; Munoz D; Lee SJ; Berry DA; van Ravesteyn NT; Alagoz O; Kerlikowske K; Tosteson AN; Near AM; Hoeffken A; Chang Y; Heijnsdijk EA; Chisholm G; Huang X; Huang H; Ergun MA; Gangnon R; Sprague BL; Plevritis S; Feuer E; de Koning HJ; Cronin KA
Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):215-25. PubMed ID: 26756606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Screening for dense breasts: digital breast tomosynthesis.
Destounis SV; Morgan R; Arieno A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Feb; 204(2):261-4. PubMed ID: 25615747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Screen-detected versus interval cancers: Effect of imaging modality and breast density in the Flemish Breast Cancer Screening Programme.
Timmermans L; Bleyen L; Bacher K; Van Herck K; Lemmens K; Van Ongeval C; Van Steen A; Martens P; De Brabander I; Goossens M; Thierens H
Eur Radiol; 2017 Sep; 27(9):3810-3819. PubMed ID: 28289944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Synthetic 2D Mammography versus Digital Mammography: Evaluation in a Population-based Screening Program.
Hofvind S; Hovda T; Holen ÅS; Lee CI; Albertsen J; Bjørndal H; Brandal SHB; Gullien R; Lømo J; Park D; Romundstad L; Suhrke P; Vigeland E; Skaane P
Radiology; 2018 Jun; 287(3):787-794. PubMed ID: 29494322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Digital breast tomosynthesis (3D mammography) for breast cancer screening and for assessment of screen-recalled findings: review of the evidence.
Li T; Marinovich ML; Houssami N
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2018 Aug; 18(8):785-791. PubMed ID: 29847744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Breast cancer screening with digital breast tomosynthesis.
Skaane P
Breast Cancer; 2017 Jan; 24(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 27138386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Performance of one-view breast tomosynthesis as a stand-alone breast cancer screening modality: results from the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial, a population-based study.
Lång K; Andersson I; Rosso A; Tingberg A; Timberg P; Zackrisson S
Eur Radiol; 2016 Jan; 26(1):184-90. PubMed ID: 25929946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Digital Mammography versus Breast Tomosynthesis: Impact of Breast Density on Diagnostic Performance in Population-based Screening.
Østerås BH; Martinsen ACT; Gullien R; Skaane P
Radiology; 2019 Oct; 293(1):60-68. PubMed ID: 31407968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Breast screening using 2D-mammography or integrating digital breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) for single-reading or double-reading--evidence to guide future screening strategies.
Houssami N; Macaskill P; Bernardi D; Caumo F; Pellegrini M; Brunelli S; Tuttobene P; Bricolo P; Fantò C; Valentini M; Ciatto S
Eur J Cancer; 2014 Jul; 50(10):1799-1807. PubMed ID: 24746887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of tomosynthesis plus digital mammography and digital mammography alone for breast cancer screening.
Haas BM; Kalra V; Geisel J; Raghu M; Durand M; Philpotts LE
Radiology; 2013 Dec; 269(3):694-700. PubMed ID: 23901124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Clinical performance metrics of 3D digital breast tomosynthesis compared with 2D digital mammography for breast cancer screening in community practice.
Greenberg JS; Javitt MC; Katzen J; Michael S; Holland AE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):687-93. PubMed ID: 24918774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Performance of breast cancer screening using digital breast tomosynthesis: results from the prospective population-based Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial.
Skaane P; Sebuødegård S; Bandos AI; Gur D; Østerås BH; Gullien R; Hofvind S
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Jun; 169(3):489-496. PubMed ID: 29429017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Supplemental Screening for Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
Melnikow J; Fenton JJ; Whitlock EP; Miglioretti DL; Weyrich MS; Thompson JH; Shah K
Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):268-78. PubMed ID: 26757021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Baseline Screening Mammography: Performance of Full-Field Digital Mammography Versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
McDonald ES; McCarthy AM; Akhtar AL; Synnestvedt MB; Schnall M; Conant EF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Nov; 205(5):1143-8. PubMed ID: 26496565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effect of integrating digital breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) with acquired or synthetic 2D-mammography on radiologists' true-positive and false-positive detection in a population screening trial: A descriptive study.
Bernardi D; Li T; Pellegrini M; Macaskill P; Valentini M; Fantò C; Ostillio L; Houssami N
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Sep; 106():26-31. PubMed ID: 30150047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
