BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

314 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27808007)

  • 21. The effect of divided attention on false memory depends on how memory is tested.
    Dewhurst SA; Barry C; Swannell ER; Holmes SJ; Bathurst GL
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Jun; 35(4):660-7. PubMed ID: 17848024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The importance of material-processing interactions in inducing false memories.
    Chan JC; McDermott KB; Watson JM; Gallo DA
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Apr; 33(3):389-95. PubMed ID: 16156175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Misguided multiplication: creating false memories with numbers rather than words.
    Pesta BJ; Sanders RE; Murphy MD
    Mem Cognit; 2001 Apr; 29(3):478-83. PubMed ID: 11407424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Thinking of critical words during study is unnecessary for false memory in the Deese, Roediger, and McDermott procedure.
    Seamon JG; Lee IA; Toner SK; Wheeler RH; Goodkind MS; Birch AD
    Psychol Sci; 2002 Nov; 13(6):526-31. PubMed ID: 12430836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. What factors underlie associative and categorical memory illusions? The roles of backward associative strength and interitem connectivity.
    Knott LM; Dewhurst SA; Howe ML
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jan; 38(1):229-39. PubMed ID: 21875250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A memory-interference versus the "dud"-effect account of a DRM false memory result: Fewer related targets at test, higher critical-lure false recognition.
    Jou J; Hwang M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Aug; 29(4):1397-1404. PubMed ID: 35318582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Reported serial positions of true and illusory memories in the Deese/Roediger/McDermott paradigm.
    Prohaska V; DelValle D; Toglia MP; Pittman AE
    Memory; 2016 Aug; 24(7):865-83. PubMed ID: 26275167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Dissociative effects of phonological vs. semantic associates on recognition memory in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott paradigm.
    Tse CS; Li Y; Neill WT
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Jul; 137(3):269-79. PubMed ID: 21377636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. How are false memories distinguishable from true memories in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm? A review of the findings.
    Jou J; Flores S
    Psychol Res; 2013 Nov; 77(6):671-86. PubMed ID: 23266577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of activation level between true and false items in the DRM paradigm.
    Senese VP; Sergi I; Iachini T
    Cogn Process; 2010 Aug; 11(3):213-7. PubMed ID: 19609786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Semantic and repetition priming effects for Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) critical items and associates produced by DRM and unrelated study lists.
    Tse CS; Neely JH
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Jul; 35(5):1047-66. PubMed ID: 17910188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Word-frequency effects in long-term semantic priming and false memory.
    Sherman SM; Jordan TR
    Br J Psychol; 2011 Aug; 102(3):559-68. PubMed ID: 21752006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The role of associative strength in children's false memory illusions.
    Howe ML; Wimmer MC; Blease K
    Memory; 2009 Jan; 17(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 19031309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. False recognitions in the DRM paradigm: the role of stress and warning.
    Guzey M; Yılmaz B
    Cogn Process; 2022 Feb; 23(1):99-107. PubMed ID: 34618255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. False and veridical collaborative recognition.
    Thorley C; Dewhurst SA
    Memory; 2009 Jan; 17(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 19058091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Item-specific processing reduces false memories.
    McCabe DP; Presmanes AG; Robertson CL; Smith AD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Dec; 11(6):1074-9. PubMed ID: 15875978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. False recall in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm: The roles of gist and associative strength.
    Cann DR; McRae K; Katz AN
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Aug; 64(8):1515-42. PubMed ID: 21506047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. False recall for people's names in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott Paradigm: conspicuousness and semantic encoding of the critical lure.
    Mukai A
    Percept Mot Skills; 2004 Dec; 99(3 Pt 2):1123-35. PubMed ID: 15739835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Incidental versus intentional encoding in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm: does amnesic patients' implicit false memory depend on conscious activation of the lure?
    Van Damme I; d'Ydewalle G
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2010 Jun; 32(5):536-54. PubMed ID: 19882421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories.
    Oliver MC; Bays RB; Miller C
    J Vis Exp; 2018 Nov; (141):. PubMed ID: 30507920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.