These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27808008)

  • 1. Inside implant criteria or not? - Detection of non-organic hearing loss during cochlear implant assessment.
    Mistry SG; Carr SD; Tapper L; Meredith B; Strachan DR; Raine CH
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2016 Nov; 17(6):276-282. PubMed ID: 27808008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nonorganic hearing loss in children: audiometry, clinical characteristics, biographical history and recovery of hearing thresholds.
    Schmidt CM; am Zehnhoff-Dinnesen A; Matulat P; Knief A; Rosslau K; Deuster D
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Jul; 77(7):1190-3. PubMed ID: 23726956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Non-organic hearing loss.
    Hiraumi H; Tsuji J; Kanemaru S; Fujino K; Ito J
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 2007 Feb; (557):3-7. PubMed ID: 17453433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Audiogram and cochlear implant candidacy--UK perspective.
    Chundu S; Flynn SL
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 Jul; 15(4):241-4. PubMed ID: 24144046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hearing preservation outcomes with different cochlear implant electrodes: Nucleus® Hybrid™-L24 and Nucleus Freedom™ CI422.
    Jurawitz MC; Büchner A; Harpel T; Schüssler M; Majdani O; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz T
    Audiol Neurootol; 2014; 19(5):293-309. PubMed ID: 25277083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Non-organic hearing loss: new and confirmed findings.
    Holenweg A; Kompis M
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2010 Aug; 267(8):1213-9. PubMed ID: 20204391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cochlear implant candidates with psychogenic hearing loss.
    Kompis M; Senn P; Mantokoudis G; Caversaccio M
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2015 Apr; 135(4):376-80. PubMed ID: 25740258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cochlear function following implantation with a full electrode array.
    Obholzer RJ; Gibson WP
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2011 Feb; 12(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 21756458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of residual hearing in traditional cochlear implant candidates after implantation with a conventional electrode.
    Cosetti MK; Friedmann DR; Zhu BZ; Heman-Ackah SE; Fang Y; Keller RG; Shapiro WH; Roland JT; Waltzman SB
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Apr; 34(3):516-21. PubMed ID: 23449440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nonorganic hearing loss in cochlear implant candidates.
    Spraggs PD; Burton MJ; Graham JM
    Am J Otol; 1994 Sep; 15(5):652-7. PubMed ID: 8572067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Nonorganic (functional) hearing disorders in childhood].
    Böhme G
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1984 Mar; 63(3):147-50. PubMed ID: 6717211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An evaluation of hearing preservation outcomes in routine cochlear implant care: Implications for candidacy.
    Verschuur C; Hellier W; Teo C
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2016 Apr; 17 Suppl 1():62-5. PubMed ID: 27099115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pure tone auditory thresholds can change according to duration of interrupted tones in patients with psychogenic hearing loss.
    Oishi N; Inoue Y; Hori A; Yakushimaru R; Kohno N; Ogawa K
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2011 Jun; 131(6):628-32. PubMed ID: 21254959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An evaluation of preservation of residual hearing using the suprameatal approach for cochlear implantation: can this implantation technique be used for preservation of residual hearing?
    Postelmans JT; van Spronsen E; Grolman W; Stokroos RJ; Tange RA; Maré MJ; Dreschler WA
    Laryngoscope; 2011 Aug; 121(8):1794-9. PubMed ID: 21792971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of hearing preservation on electrical thresholds and speech performances in cochlear implantation.
    D'Elia A; Bartoli R; Giagnotti F; Quaranta N
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Apr; 33(3):343-7. PubMed ID: 22388729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cochlear, brain stem, and cortical evoked responses in nonorganic hearing loss.
    Sohmer H; Feinmesser M; Bauberger-Tell L; Edelstein E
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1977; 86(2 pt. 1):227-34. PubMed ID: 848835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multicenter study with a direct acoustic cochlear implant.
    Lenarz T; Zwartenkot JW; Stieger C; Schwab B; Mylanus EA; Caversaccio M; Kompis M; Snik AF; D'hondt C; Mojallal H
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Sep; 34(7):1215-25. PubMed ID: 23921930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of residual hearing in cochlear implants candidates using auditory steady-state response.
    Ramos HF; Grasel SS; Beck RM; Takahashi-Ramos MT; Ramos BF; de Almeida ER; Bento RF; de Brito Neto R
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2015 Mar; 135(3):246-53. PubMed ID: 25649884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cochlear implants for adults obtaining marginal benefit from acoustic amplification: a European study.
    Fraysse B; Dillier N; Klenzner T; Laszig R; Manrique M; Morera Perez C; Morgon AH; Müller-Deile J; Ramos Macias A
    Am J Otol; 1998 Sep; 19(5):591-7. PubMed ID: 9752966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic utility of Stenger test: reappraisal of its value.
    Arslan HH; Edizer DT; Cebeci S; Erdal M
    Int Tinnitus J; 2014; 19(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 27186834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.