327 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27809559)
1. Author Modifications of Accepted Manuscripts and Galley Proofs: Sharing of Ideas on the Issue.
Wiwanitkit V
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Feb; 208(2):W59. PubMed ID: 27809559
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Reviewer development: new initiatives.
Berquist TH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jan; 204(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 25539228
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Publication Takes Patience: Revision and Resubmission.
Wood BD; Haynes KW
Radiol Technol; 2015; 87(1):114-7. PubMed ID: 26377277
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Handling manuscript rejection: insights from evidence and experience.
Woolley KL; Barron JP
Chest; 2009 Feb; 135(2):573-577. PubMed ID: 19201723
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. We are delighted to have received 273 replies from reviewers specifying their subspecialty interests. Introduction.
Frank JD; Mouriquand P; Caldamone A; Malone PS
J Pediatr Urol; 2012 Jun; 8(3):223. PubMed ID: 22583554
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. JOURNAL CLUB: Plagiarism in Manuscripts Submitted to the AJR: Development of an Optimal Screening Algorithm and Management Pathways.
Taylor DB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Apr; 208(4):712-720. PubMed ID: 28125269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Authorship and co-authorship].
Haug C
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Feb; 126(4):429. PubMed ID: 16477275
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Selected summaries].
Müller-Lissner S
Z Gastroenterol; 2011 Jul; 49(12):1525. PubMed ID: 22139874
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Peer review: should we modify our process?
Berquist TH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Mar; 202(3):463-4. PubMed ID: 24555581
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Simplified submission.
Bradley-Springer L
J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care; 2014; 25(4):281-3. PubMed ID: 24923729
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Accepted manuscripts and galley proofs.
Elston DM
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2019 Jul; 81(1):73. PubMed ID: 31228991
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Publishing in English-language journals.
Davis AJ; Tschudin V
Nurs Ethics; 2007 May; 14(3):425-30. PubMed ID: 17459824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Peer-review and editorial process of the Ethiopian Medical Journal: ten years assessment of the status of submitted manuscripts.
Enquselassie F
Ethiop Med J; 2013 Apr; 51(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 24079153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. On peer review.
Schuklenk U
Bioethics; 2015 Feb; 29(2):ii-iii. PubMed ID: 25586285
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Publishing and getting published.
Gardner G
Collegian; 2003 Jan; 10(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 15534956
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Radiology 2016: The Care and Scientific Rigor Used to Process and Evaluate Original Research Manuscripts for Publication.
Levine D; Kressel HY
Radiology; 2016 Jan; 278(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 26690988
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Behind the curtain: a look inside the publication process.
Ludwig RL; Kellogg A
Radiol Technol; 2014; 86(1):90-2. PubMed ID: 25224088
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Equal authorship for equal authors: personal experience as an equal author in twenty peer-reviewed medical publications during the last three years.
Cappell MS
J Med Libr Assoc; 2016 Oct; 104(4):363-364. PubMed ID: 27822165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Reviewer assistance: how important is the invitation letter?
Berquist TH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):467. PubMed ID: 25148147
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Ten simple rules for getting published.
Bourne PE
PLoS Comput Biol; 2005 Oct; 1(5):e57. PubMed ID: 16261197
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
