These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27809666)

  • 1. Evidence for view-invariant face recognition units in unfamiliar face learning.
    Etchells DB; Brooks JL; Johnston RA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 May; 70(5):874-889. PubMed ID: 27809666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Face learning and the emergence of view-independent face recognition: an event-related brain potential study.
    Zimmermann FG; Eimer M
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Jun; 51(7):1320-9. PubMed ID: 23583970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Symmetrical Viewpoint Representations in Face-Selective Regions Convey an Advantage in the Perception and Recognition of Faces.
    Flack TR; Harris RJ; Young AW; Andrews TJ
    J Neurosci; 2019 May; 39(19):3741-3751. PubMed ID: 30842248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Telling faces together: Learning new faces through exposure to multiple instances.
    Andrews S; Jenkins R; Cursiter H; Burton AM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(10):2041-50. PubMed ID: 25607814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. N250 ERP correlates of the acquisition of face representations across different images.
    Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR; Burton AM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 21(4):625-41. PubMed ID: 18702593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Caricature generalization benefits for faces learned with enhanced idiosyncratic shape or texture.
    Itz ML; Schweinberger SR; Kaufmann JM
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2017 Feb; 17(1):185-197. PubMed ID: 27718208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gender-based prototype formation in face recognition.
    Baudouin JY; Brochard R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):888-98. PubMed ID: 21480752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Learning faces from variability.
    Ritchie KL; Burton AM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 May; 70(5):897-905. PubMed ID: 26831280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Distinctive voices enhance the visual recognition of unfamiliar faces.
    Bülthoff I; Newell FN
    Cognition; 2015 Apr; 137():9-21. PubMed ID: 25584464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The movement advantage in famous and unfamiliar faces: a comparison of point-light displays and shape-normalised avatar stimuli.
    Bennetts RJ; Kim J; Burke D; Brooks KR; Lucey S; Saragih J; Robbins RA
    Perception; 2013; 42(9):950-70. PubMed ID: 24386715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceptual learning in face processing: comparison facilitates face recognition.
    Dwyer DM; Vladeanu M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Oct; 62(10):2055-67. PubMed ID: 19235097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The faces you remember: caricaturing shape facilitates brain processes reflecting the acquisition of new face representations.
    Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR
    Biol Psychol; 2012 Jan; 89(1):21-33. PubMed ID: 21925235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recognizing unfamiliar faces: the effects of distinctiveness and view.
    Newell FN; Chiroro P; Valentine T
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1999 May; 52(2):509-34. PubMed ID: 10428688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. High and low performers differ in the use of shape information for face recognition.
    Kaufmann JM; Schulz C; Schweinberger SR
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Jun; 51(7):1310-9. PubMed ID: 23562837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Timing constraints of temporal view association in face recognition.
    Arnold G; Siéroff E
    Vision Res; 2012 Feb; 54():61-7. PubMed ID: 22186224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Learning task affects ERP-correlates of the own-race bias, but not recognition memory performance.
    Stahl J; Wiese H; Schweinberger SR
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jun; 48(7):2027-40. PubMed ID: 20362599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A search advantage for faces learned in motion.
    Pilz KS; Thornton IM; Bülthoff HH
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 171(4):436-47. PubMed ID: 16331505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Familiarity and face processing.
    Osborne CD; Stevenage SV
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(1):108-20. PubMed ID: 22906071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tolerance for distorted faces: challenges to a configural processing account of familiar face recognition.
    Sandford A; Burton AM
    Cognition; 2014 Sep; 132(3):262-8. PubMed ID: 24853629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perception of novel faces: the parts have it!
    Lobmaier JS; Mast FW
    Perception; 2007; 36(11):1660-73. PubMed ID: 18265846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.