BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27809784)

  • 21. Comparison of statistical approaches dealing with time-dependent confounding in drug effectiveness studies.
    Karim ME; Petkau J; Gustafson P; Platt RW; Tremlett H;
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Jun; 27(6):1709-1722. PubMed ID: 27659168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Choice of time scale and its effect on significance of predictors in longitudinal studies.
    Pencina MJ; Larson MG; D'Agostino RB
    Stat Med; 2007 Mar; 26(6):1343-59. PubMed ID: 16955538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Estimating causal effects for survival (time-to-event) outcomes by combining classification tree analysis and propensity score weighting.
    Linden A; Yarnold PR
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2018 Apr; 24(2):380-387. PubMed ID: 29230910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A weighted Cox model for modelling time-dependent exposures in the analysis of case-control studies.
    Leffondre K; Wynant W; Cao Z; Abrahamowicz M; Heinze G; Siemiatycki J
    Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):839-50. PubMed ID: 20213717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A comparison of methods for fixed effects meta-analysis of individual patient data with time to event outcomes.
    Tudur Smith C; Williamson PR
    Clin Trials; 2007; 4(6):621-30. PubMed ID: 18042571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. To adjust or not to adjust for baseline when analyzing repeated binary responses? The case of complete data when treatment comparison at study end is of interest.
    Jiang H; Kulkarni PM; Mallinckrodt CH; Shurzinske L; Molenberghs G; Lipkovich I
    Pharm Stat; 2015; 14(3):262-71. PubMed ID: 25866149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Semiparametric modeling of longitudinal measurements and time-to-event data--a two-stage regression calibration approach.
    Ye W; Lin X; Taylor JM
    Biometrics; 2008 Dec; 64(4):1238-46. PubMed ID: 18261160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Model inconsistency, illustrated by the Cox proportional hazards model.
    Ford I; Norrie J; Ahmadi S
    Stat Med; 1995 Apr; 14(8):735-46. PubMed ID: 7644855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Immortal Time Bias in Observational Studies of Time-to-Event Outcomes: Assessing Effects of Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy Using the National Cancer Database.
    Agarwal P; Moshier E; Ru M; Ohri N; Ennis R; Rosenzweig K; Mazumdar M
    Cancer Control; 2018; 25(1):1073274818789355. PubMed ID: 30021466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An empirical comparison of multivariable methods for estimating risk of death from coronary heart disease.
    Knuiman MW; Vu HT; Segal MR
    J Cardiovasc Risk; 1997 Apr; 4(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 9304494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Estimating adjusted risk difference (RD) and number needed to treat (NNT) measures in the Cox regression model.
    Laubender RP; Bender R
    Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):851-9. PubMed ID: 20213710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
    Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparison of the conditional inference survival forest model to random survival forests based on a simulation study as well as on two applications with time-to-event data.
    Nasejje JB; Mwambi H; Dheda K; Lesosky M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Jul; 17(1):115. PubMed ID: 28754093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A Time-varying Covariate Approach for Survival Analysis of Paediatric Outcomes.
    Zhao J; Zhao Y; Lee AH; Binns CW
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2017 Nov; 31(6):598-602. PubMed ID: 28940519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of Adjusted and Unadjusted Indirect Comparison Methods in Benefit Assessment. A Simulation Study for Time-to-event Endpoints.
    Kühnast S; Schiffner-Rohe J; Rahnenführer J; Leverkus F
    Methods Inf Med; 2017 May; 56(3):261-267. PubMed ID: 28361159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cox regression can be collapsible and Aalen regression can be non-collapsible.
    Samuelsen SO
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2023 Apr; 29(2):403-419. PubMed ID: 36271175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Multicity study of air pollution and mortality in Latin America (the ESCALA study).
    Romieu I; Gouveia N; Cifuentes LA; de Leon AP; Junger W; Vera J; Strappa V; Hurtado-Díaz M; Miranda-Soberanis V; Rojas-Bracho L; Carbajal-Arroyo L; Tzintzun-Cervantes G;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 Oct; (171):5-86. PubMed ID: 23311234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Relations of Liver Fat With Prevalent and Incident Atrial Fibrillation in the Framingham Heart Study.
    Long MT; Yin X; Larson MG; Ellinor PT; Lubitz SA; McManus DD; Magnani JW; Staerk L; Ko D; Helm RH; Hoffmann U; Chung RT; Benjamin EJ
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2017 May; 6(5):. PubMed ID: 28465298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. On the use of Cox regression in the presence of an irregularly observed time-dependent covariate.
    de Bruijne MH; le Cessie S; Kluin-Nelemans HC; van Houwelingen HC
    Stat Med; 2001 Dec; 20(24):3817-29. PubMed ID: 11782036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.