BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27810286)

  • 1. Spatial and non-spatial multisensory cueing in unilateral cochlear implant users.
    Pavani F; Venturini M; Baruffaldi F; Artesini L; Bonfioli F; Frau GN; van Zoest W
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():24-37. PubMed ID: 27810286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Capturing Visual Attention With Perturbed Auditory Spatial Cues.
    Valzolgher C; Alzaher M; Gaveau V; Coudert A; Marx M; Truy E; Barone P; Farnè A; Pavani F
    Trends Hear; 2023; 27():23312165231182289. PubMed ID: 37611181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of congruent and incongruent visual cues on speech perception and brain activity in cochlear implant users.
    Song JJ; Lee HJ; Kang H; Lee DS; Chang SO; Oh SH
    Brain Struct Funct; 2015 Mar; 220(2):1109-25. PubMed ID: 24402676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spectro-temporal cues enhance modulation sensitivity in cochlear implant users.
    Zheng Y; Escabí M; Litovsky RY
    Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():45-54. PubMed ID: 28601530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Changes in visually and auditory attended audiovisual speech processing in cochlear implant users: A longitudinal ERP study.
    Weglage A; Layer N; Meister H; Müller V; Lang-Roth R; Walger M; Sandmann P
    Hear Res; 2024 Jun; 447():109023. PubMed ID: 38733710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Binaural sensitivity in children who use bilateral cochlear implants.
    Ehlers E; Goupell MJ; Zheng Y; Godar SP; Litovsky RY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):4264. PubMed ID: 28618809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contralateral routing of signals disrupts monaural level and spectral cues to sound localisation on the horizontal plane.
    Pedley AJ; Kitterick PT
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():104-111. PubMed ID: 28666702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing sound localization deficits in bilateral cochlear-implant users and vocoder simulations with normal-hearing listeners.
    Jones H; Kan A; Litovsky RY
    Trends Hear; 2014 Nov; 18():. PubMed ID: 25385244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perception and coding of interaural time differences with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Laback B; Egger K; Majdak P
    Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():138-50. PubMed ID: 25456088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differences in the temporal course of interaural time difference sensitivity between acoustic and electric hearing in amplitude modulated stimuli.
    Hu H; Ewert SD; McAlpine D; Dietz M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):1862. PubMed ID: 28372072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interaural envelope correlation change discrimination in bilateral cochlear implantees: effects of mismatch, centering, and onset of deafness.
    Goupell MJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1282-97. PubMed ID: 25786942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Objective assessment of electrode discrimination with the auditory change complex in adult cochlear implant users.
    Mathew R; Undurraga J; Li G; Meerton L; Boyle P; Shaida A; Selvadurai D; Jiang D; Vickers D
    Hear Res; 2017 Oct; 354():86-101. PubMed ID: 28826636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Binaural hearing in children using Gaussian enveloped and transposed tones.
    Ehlers E; Kan A; Winn MB; Stoelb C; Litovsky RY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Apr; 139(4):1724. PubMed ID: 27106319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Extent of lateralization at large interaural time differences in simulated electric hearing and bilateral cochlear implant users.
    Baumgärtel RM; Hu H; Kollmeier B; Dietz M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2338. PubMed ID: 28464641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Precedence based speech segregation in bilateral cochlear implant users.
    Hossain S; Montazeri V; Assmann PF; Litovsky RY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):EL545-50. PubMed ID: 26723365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Internalized elevation perception of simple stimuli in cochlear-implant and normal-hearing listeners.
    Thakkar T; Goupell MJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):841-52. PubMed ID: 25096117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of electrophysiological and behavioural measures of electrode discrimination in adult cochlear implant users.
    Mathew R; Vickers D; Boyle P; Shaida A; Selvadurai D; Jiang D; Undurraga J
    Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():74-87. PubMed ID: 30031354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sequential stream segregation with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Wijetillake AA; van Hoesel RJM; Cowan R
    Hear Res; 2019 Nov; 383():107812. PubMed ID: 31630083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Discrimination of intonation contours by adolescents with cochlear implants.
    Holt CM; McDermott HJ
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Dec; 52(12):808-15. PubMed ID: 24053225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.