These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

327 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27810348)

  • 1. Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump for Treating Cardiogenic Shock: Meta-Analysis.
    Ouweneel DM; Eriksen E; Seyfarth M; Henriques JP
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2017 Jan; 69(3):358-360. PubMed ID: 27810348
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Percutaneous assist devices vs. intra-aortic balloon pump for cardiogenic shock: evidence under construction vs. expert opinion.
    Engström AE; Sjauw KD; Henriques JP
    Eur Heart J; 2010 Feb; 31(4):502; author reply 502-3. PubMed ID: 19952005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump.
    Gajanan G; Brilakis ES; Siller-Matula JM; Zolty RL; Velagapudi P
    J Vis Exp; 2021 Feb; (168):. PubMed ID: 33616109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices vs. intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation for treatment of cardiogenic shock: a meta-analysis of controlled trials.
    Cheng JM; den Uil CA; Hoeks SE; van der Ent M; Jewbali LS; van Domburg RT; Serruys PW
    Eur Heart J; 2009 Sep; 30(17):2102-8. PubMed ID: 19617601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mechanical Circulatory Support in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure and Shock.
    Sodhi N; Lasala JM
    Interv Cardiol Clin; 2017 Jul; 6(3):387-405. PubMed ID: 28600092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Cardiogenic Shock.
    Mandawat A; Rao SV
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 May; 10(5):. PubMed ID: 28500136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction.
    Ouweneel DM; Eriksen E; Sjauw KD; van Dongen IM; Hirsch A; Packer EJ; Vis MM; Wykrzykowska JJ; Koch KT; Baan J; de Winter RJ; Piek JJ; Lagrand WK; de Mol BA; Tijssen JG; Henriques JP
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2017 Jan; 69(3):278-287. PubMed ID: 27810347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Combined hemodynamic support with the Impella 2.5 device and intra-aortic balloon pump for management of refractory cardiogenic shock.
    Pavlidis AN; Redwood SR; Clapp BR
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2014 May; 26(5):E50-1. PubMed ID: 24791724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock.
    Werdan K; Gielen S; Ebelt H; Hochman JS
    Eur Heart J; 2014 Jan; 35(3):156-67. PubMed ID: 24014384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The Impella system for mechanical support and myocardial recovery].
    Engström AE; de Mol BA; Lagrand WK; Henriques JP
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2010; 154(45):A2699. PubMed ID: 21118589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In-hospital outcomes of percutaneous ventricular assist devices versus intra-aortic balloon pumps in non-ischemia related cardiogenic shock.
    Ogunbayo GO; Ha LD; Ahmad Q; Misumida N; Elbadawi A; Olorunfemi O; Kolodziej A; Messerli AW; Abdel-Latif A; Elayi CS; Guglin M
    Heart Lung; 2018; 47(4):392-397. PubMed ID: 29656961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Support of damaged heart with the Impella pump].
    Ouweneel DM; Lagrand WK; de Mol BAJM; Henriques JPS
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2017; 161():D1085. PubMed ID: 28659199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mechanical versus pharmacologic support for cardiogenic shock.
    Dhar G; Jolly N
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Mar; 75(4):626-9. PubMed ID: 20049971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation (IABP) for myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.
    Unverzagt S; Machemer MT; Solms A; Thiele H; Burkhoff D; Seyfarth M; de Waha A; Ohman EM; Buerke M; Haerting J; Werdan K; Prondzinsky R
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2011 Jul; (7):CD007398. PubMed ID: 21735410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-term survival using intra-aortic balloon pump and percutaneous right ventricular assist device for biventricular mechanical support of cardiogenic shock.
    Atwater BD; Nee LM; Gimelli G
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2008 Jul; 20(7):E205-7. PubMed ID: 18599903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: role of mechanical circulatory support.
    Aggarwal S; Slaughter MS
    Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2008 Oct; 6(9):1223-35. PubMed ID: 18939910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effectiveness of intra-aortic balloon pump for myocardial infarction in patients with or without cardiogenic shock: a meta-analysis and systematic review.
    Zheng XY; Wang Y; Chen Y; Wang X; Chen L; Li J; Zheng ZG
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2016 Jul; 16(1):148. PubMed ID: 27391391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The evolution of temporary percutaneous mechanical circulatory support devices: a review of the options and evidence in cardiogenic shock.
    Abnousi F; Yong CM; Fearon W; Banerjee D
    Curr Cardiol Rep; 2015 Jun; 17(6):40. PubMed ID: 25899658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Novel percutaneous mechanical circulatory support devices and their expanding applications.
    Spratt JR; Raveendran G; Liao K; John R
    Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2016 Oct; 14(10):1133-50. PubMed ID: 27450699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Percutaneous ventricular assist device support during off-pump surgical coronary revascularization.
    Gregoric ID; Poglajen G; Span M; Frazier OH; Loyalka P; Kar B
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2008 Aug; 86(2):637-9. PubMed ID: 18640347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.